User talk:Echoarchaeo/sandbox

Comments on article
I see the boxes are still there. Not sure why. I don't think they'll affect the eventual move to the main page.Profarch (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

I thought over all it was really good, a lot of good information. My only suggestion would be maybe its to much information, make it a little more short and sweet. The part about the farmer allowing them to use his land I don’t see as being extremely necessary. While intresting, I feel it takes away from some of the more important information when you have so much content. Also maybe add some sections? Site history, findings, time periods, stuff like that. Or maybe a section for each individual time period. I feel that would just make it a little easier to read, and understand. Over all though I though it was great, I was impressed with how much you were able to find on your site. All the information anyway would need to know was there, so great job. Holden Crawfield (talk) 02:28, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review 2
I'm not sure why but everything is in boxes. I'm sure you already know this but obviously there's some formatting issue that'll need to be fixed before being published. That being said, there's a lot more information here than I've seen on any other article so far so good job! Each of the sections deals with something specific and is organized well and provides lots of information. Some of it seems to be uncited though. The last section for example has no reference and it'd be nice to see some links to other articles on Wikipedia like the Tapi river. Good job with the research and summarizing the site!Roccoisagoodboy (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
This is a really great article with lots of great information! You have really great diction but I know we were supposed to sort of dumb it down so maybe put some of it in simpler terms? Although the info was great, it was a little strange not having sections so I would definitely add those so the reader knows exactly what topic they are reading. Lastly, I didn't see the use of many links. You could probably add a link to Chacolithic Period, Early Iron Age, Harappa, etc. Other than that I really enjoyed it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minnetonka180 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 22 March 2018 (UTC)