User talk:Eclecticology/Archive 2

Hywel Fychan
I have responded to your inquiry on my talk page. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I also have responded on my Talk page to keep things in one place. -- Alexf42 11:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Library of Congress Classification:Class Q -- Science
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Library of Congress Classification:Class Q -- Science, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 15:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Library of Congress Classification System
Hi Eclecticology, I apologize if I came off as too combative about the LoC articles. I still have doubts about them though. What are your reasons for keeping them?--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:11, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Thurn and Taxis
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Thurn and Taxis, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Thurn and Taxis has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Thurn and Taxis, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

with respect to a deleted category
i fail to see how creating a page with only a hangon tag on it can be considered an attempt at civil conversation. Pegasus &laquo;C¦T&raquo; 17:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikimédia Québec
(English version follow)

Allo,

Je suis heureux de vos interventions sur fr:Discussion Projet:Québec. Nous aurons une réunion au mois de janvier 2009 à propos de Wikimédia Québec et j'avais quelques questions pour vous :


 * 1) Si nous acceptons d'être un sous-chapitre de Wikimédia Canada, nous autorisez-vous à enregistrer le nom de domaine www.wikimedia.qc.ca ainsi que le nom de Wikimédia Québec ? Vous faut-il une autorisation de la Wikimedia Foundation pour ce faire ? Vous faut-il une lettre de notre association d'utilisateurs pour cela ?
 * 2) Quels sont vos objectifs à court terme ? J'ai récemment su que le chapitre Wikimédia-de a obtenu du gouvernement allemand un changement de licence pour les images de ce dernier (fr:Wikipédia:Le Bistro/7 décembre 2008). J'envisage que nous pourrions faire de même au Québec et au Canada. Je rencontre prochainement une représentante du député provincial de ma région et j'aborderai cette question. Une action de Wikimédia Canada dans ce sens serait intéressante (plusieurs images de Radio-Canada.ca seraient vraiment intéressantes, mais c'est une société fédérale).
 * 3) Si nous acceptons d'être un sous-chapitre de Wikimédia Canada, a-t-on besoin de faire des démarches pour enregistrer notre organisme au niveau provincial ou devons-nous attendre votre enregistrement national ? Un bon dossier monté au fédéral devrait pouvoir être transféré au provincial.

Merci de votre attention et bonne journée !

(Excuse my poor english)

Hi !

First of all, I would like to thank you for your interventions on the discussion fr:Discussion Projet:Québec. We'll have a meeting january 2009 about the Wikimédia Québec project and I have some questions for you :


 * 1) If we accept to be a subchapter of Wikimédia Canada, do you accept that we register ourselves on the website www.wikimedia.qc.ca with the name Wikimédia Québec ? Do you need an autorisation of the Wikimedia Foundation for that ? Do you need a « official » letter of our organisation for that ?
 * 2) What are your short term goals ? Recently, I read that the Wikimedia-de chapter convince the German Governement to change some picture licence (fr:Wikipédia:Le Bistro/7 décembre 2008). I think that we can try to do the same in Canada and Québec. I will meet tomorrow one of the team member of my provincial deputy and I'll talk about that to her. I can be very interesting if Wikimedia Canada can do the same with federals organisations (like Radio-Canada/CBC).
 * 3) If we accept to be a subchapter of Wikimédia Canada, do we need to register our provincial organism ? A good federal file can be (easely ?) transfered to the provincial.

Regards,

- Khayman (contact) 19:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

P.S. : Can you please answer me on my french user talk page ?
 * Rebonjour,
 * Nous sommes plusieurs utilisateurs qui allons nous rencontrer à la mi-janvier dans la ville de Québec, à l'Université Laval. Nous planifions de discuter de l'incorporation de notre association et, pour ce faire, nous avons besoin de l'autorisation de la WMF d'utiliser le nom Wikimédia Québec ainsi qu'une version du logo WMF (fr:Projet:Québec/Wikimédia Québec). J'ai les papiers pour l'enregistrement de notre association québécoise et nous pourrions procéder dès la semaine suivant la réunion.
 * L'enregistrement provincial de notre association est facile à faire et compatible avec l'enregistrement fédéral. Si vous cherchez un habitant du Québec pour signer l'enregistrement fédéral, Antaya semble très intéressé par Wikimédia Canada (il ne semble cependant pas répondre depuis une semaine. J'ai été dur avec lui. Peut-être pourrez-vous le contacter par courriel ?).
 * Pour le moment, vous est-il possible d'écrire une demande à la WMF pour que nous puissions utiliser le nom Wikimédia Québec ? Nous pourrions écrire nous aussi une lettre à la WMF avec les signatures des membres présents à la réunion de janvier.
 * Hi !
 * We organise a meeting mid-january at the Université Laval. We want to discuss about the provincial incorporation of our association. I have filled the papers to do that, but I need the autorization of the WMF (or of Wikimedia Canada ?) to use the name Wikimédia Québec and a modified version of the logo (you can see it fr:Projet:Québec/Wikimédia Québec).
 * Incorporate our association provincially is easy and compatible with your federal work. If you want someone leaving in Québec to sign your federal application, I think that Antaya can be your man. He's angry for now (I've been hard with him), but I think that you can contact him by email.
 * For now, can you ask the WMF if we can use the name Wikimédia Québec and the logo ? We can write a letter too in january and sign it to ask the same.
 * - Khayman (contact) 13:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC) fr:Discussion Utilisateur:Khayman
 * P.S. : Do you prefer that I continue to write to you in the 2 languages or you prefer one of them ? I don't know if my english is understandable... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khayman (talk • contribs) 13:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

=2009=

Sysop confirmation on enwikisource
Hello Eclecticology. Your annual confirmation discussion on enwikisource has obtained three objections, so your continued sysop access will be decided by simple majority (vote of confidence). I'm letting you know here since you've been away from enwikisource recently, and you were most recently active on this wiki. — {admin} Pathoschild 01:55:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Library of Congress classification articles
Hello Eclecticology. I found one of the Library of Congress articles in the list of those needing wikification. After posting on the talk page of WP:notability, and noting that you have made many contributions to those articles, some dating back to the early 2000s, I'm coming to ask whether you still think we should have a complete set, or whether some merger and consolidation is called for. I'm thinking of WP:NOT (a directory), and bearing in mind that the classification is readily found online in other sources. Currently the articles do not carry any commentary about the classification; they simply reproduce it. I admit that I am partly motivated by the fact that it would take me a long while to find internal links for the particular classification (on American history). Thanks. Itsmejudith (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I too would like to follow this up. I mentioned it just now on Avenoth's talk p.,, and links to earlier discussions are at  and.
 * Judith, --originally they were I think intended to be developed into a navigational device, but I don't think the LC classification (unlike, say, UDC) is suitable for narrow topics, though it has been used that way, and, based on having worked with it most of my life, I don't think of it as particularly rational. I suppose  that when possible links could be put in, as you seem to be suggesting, but I am not all that sure it is worth the effort.   I mentioned in the discussion that there is at least one good secondary source, Chen's book on LC--and  older works, plus the short descriptions in every cataloging text,  and there are some articles on various sections scattered in the literature. Come to think of it, there is another purpose--in principle, every entry there corresponds to at least one book,so in principle anything there that does not have an article in Wikipedia could have one. DGG (talk) 16:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Ernest Hemingway project?
I am interested in starting am Ernest Hemingway project to improve content related to his life and works, and have proposed the project at WikiProject_Council/Proposals. Please share your thoughts there! kilbad (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:CODGER
Join us... 190.2.21.21 (talk) 04:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Vancouver
- Mkdw talk 11:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

=2010=

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Eclecticology! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Steve Dagora -

Steve Dagora
Hey Eclecticology. Can you clarify what "Stamps" refers to in Steve Dagora? Is that a publication of some sort? Are there some other sources that could be added? Thanks! --MZMcBride (talk) 19:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Peter Turner (civil servant)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Peter Turner (civil servant), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia's tagline
Hi. I noticed that you participated in a 2005/2006 discussion and straw poll on whether or not the tagline at the top of all Wikipedia articles should be changed from "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" to "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit". I don't know if you're still interested in this issue or not, but this exact change has been proposed once again, this time at the Village pump, and there is currently an RFC (Request for Comment) on the subject where it is being discussed. All Hallow&#39;s Wraith (talk) 18:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.  MBisanz  talk 02:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Samuel Hopkins
Hi Eclecticology, are you familiar with this: Talk:Samuel_Hopkins_(inventor)? -- John Vandenberg (chat) 21:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

=2011=

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Editor's noticeboard?
Apropos of WP:CODGER -- For a proposed editor's noticeboard, which should be a pleasure to use and a source of support for editor-enthusiasts, see User:Sj/EN. Your input would be most welcome. –SJ + 11:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Hallmark
"Justification"? Have you justified why you would want to change something that was fine, the it originally was before you decided it needed changing? I haven't seen any explaination on your part for your edits either. From what I can see, it seems you just decided to change it and it looks messy.

It looks messy having all those red links, that don't lead to any movies, not to mention showing directors, actors etc.. That's what links are for.

Why are you changing it in the first place? It was created to look the list of Hallmark movies, same as the Hallmark site, minus the repeat movies of course. What's with all those "X"s too?

Why are you putting seasons in place of the years? GiantTiger001 (talk) 05:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Why are you changing it in the first place? Do you ever talk like a regular person? "Justified", "conforming"?

The way you keep adding it, looks messy and not very nice. What's wrong with making links to movies, instead of the way you're doing it? GiantTiger001 (talk) 07:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Ancient History
Just a heads up, the article Steve Dagora, which you were involved with in the past, has been PRODded for lack of references. There's part of a reference, but it's not complete enough to actually be verifiable. SDY (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Since it's been contested, I've started the full discussion deletion protocol here. SDY (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Papua New Guinea
Have you received the 1972 Encyclopedia of PNG you mentioned during the discussion about Steve Dagora? Was there a detailed entry for Dagora? A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 19:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * How frustrating! Well, please do let me know when you receive the other volumes. As a side note, I'm sure this source useful for giving other PNG-related articles a little TLC. I'm interested to hear about what you find. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Josef Stalin
Please explain I have no knowledge of transliterating Cyrillic into Latin letters, so I cannot speak to how good of an idea one or the other form is. I will say that I can see nothing gained by having different spellings of the same person's name peppering an encyclopedia, but that's honestly not something I'm interested in arguing. What I really don't understand is the scenario where Josef Stalin would be a printworthy redirect to Joseph Stalin. Are you seriously suggesting that someone would print an encyclopedia with an entry that reads "Stalin, Josef see Joseph Stalin" and then have the article on "Joseph Stalin" immediately below it? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:25, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirects "I don't think that mere alphabetical proximity is a sufficient basis for making a redirect prospectively unprintworthy... If omitting the alternative really matters at that time it's an easy editorial decision then; we don't have to decide for them now." By this reasoning, then when would anyone use Category:Printworthy redirects or Category:Unprintworthy redirects? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Not quite "[T]he idea of a print Wikipedia will never be more than fantasy." There are, have been, and will continue to be several printed editions of Wikipedia and subsets of Wikipedia articles. This is even a goal of one of the first WikiProjects. "Even it were not, the unprintworthy should be limited to misspelllings." I don't know where you got this impression, as Category:Unprintworthy redirects says, "the name of a redirect may be unprintworthy for a number of reasons, including being nearly identical to the name of the target page, containing typographical errors or not being encyclopaedic." There are several valid reasons for unprintworthy redirects and one of them is virtually identical alternative spellings. I recommend that you take a look at this CfD as well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop Category:Unprintworthy redirects is to be added to pages where, "the name of a redirect [is] nearly identical to the name of the target page." That is certainly the case with Josef Stalin/Joseph Stalin. Please stop removing this category because you think it's "silly." —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Businessperson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Businessperson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Businessperson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoldsparkle (talk • contribs) 19:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Pics!
-David Gerard (talk) 22:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Ray Saintonge, Heathrow Terminal 5, 20110801 P1020446.jpg
 * File:David Gerard, Heathrow Terminal 5, 20110801 P1020447.jpg
 * File:Ray Saintonge and David Gerard, Heathrow Terminal 5, 20110801 P1020448.jpg

=2012=

Interview?
Hi, I believe you'll be attending the Berlin meet-up. If this is the case, I wonder whether The Signpost could interview you by Skype audio after proceedings, on the Sunday or the Monday. Tony  (talk)  10:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Excellent! I'll inform The Signpost's managing editor. Please let me know your Skype username and/or email address, and we could liaise closer to the time to organise this. I have email enabled. Need take only a little of your time on the day. My available hours are about 21:00–14:00 UTC at the moment (I guess that's 20:00–13:00 Berlin time), so it looks like mid-evening would suit Tony   (talk)  05:35, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikimania Video
Hi Ray!

I saw your username on a list of Wikimania attendees. My name is Victor Grigas and I am a 'storyteller' at the Wikimedia foundation. It's my position to find and tell the stories of individual Wikipedians to share to get the public to be engaged and encouraged to support Wikipedia. I will be with a small team and we will be conducting on-camera interviews with Wikipedians at Wikimania from July 10th through July 15th and was hoping that you would be interested in sharing your story with me.

Please let me know if you are interested. There is limited availability and I expect my schedule to fill up quickly. Hope we get to meet in person!

Victor

P.S. The best way to reach me is by email: vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 01:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikimania
It was good meeting (and rooming with) you at Wikimania! See ya around, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 07:15, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear Eclecticology,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. I'm currently inviting people whose names that I recognize from around the project, please feel free to invite anyone else you like.

Best regards, -- Hex [t/c] 11:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC).

= 2013 =

Your user and user talk pages
Hi Ray, I found your user and user talk pages while doing some wikiarchaeology. . I have restored all of its earliest revisions from old copies of the Wikipedia database, so they are available to everyone now. Your user page revisions from Eclecticology are now at, and here is the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eclecticology&oldid=561641348 talk page revision that I've imported] – I've also added its text to your current talk page. Hope you don't mind. Graham 87 09:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, done. Sorry to hear that you didn't like it. Graham 87 01:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Now I've deleted the right page ... whoops! Graham 87 01:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Canvassing. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

= 2014 =

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your edit on 14 November 2003
In this 14 November 2003 edit you, as far as I can determine, introduced the YYYY-MM-DD date format, and the concept that this format conformed with ISO 8601, to the English Wikipedia. I would like to know if it was the intention of the editors at that time to conform to the requirements of that standard to always use the Gregorian calendar, and to avoid using the format for years before 1583 unless consent was obtained from data exchange partners (that is, readers). Jc3s5h (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

List of Wagon Train episodes
Hi. I noticed that you have added some cast members to the first season. I put this list together to resemble other episode lists such as the ones for M*A*S*H, Smallville , Grey's Anatomy, and The X-Files. These lists do not contain a cast member column, therefore I find it necessary to undue your work. I'm sure you mean well but the column simply does not belong in the list. Also, Wikipedia does not accept the IMDb as a reliable source. Jimknut (talk) 17:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Why don't you create the pages Wagon Train (season 1), Wagon Train (season2), etc. and include the cast members there? I think that would be better than added cast members to List of Wagon Train episodes, which is already quite large as it is. Jimknut (talk) 22:52, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Starting articles as stubs...
You wrote on someone's talk page recently... It was acceptable in those days to start an article as a stub. It bloody well still should be! —  Scott  •  talk  15:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikilvres account
No response I sent an e-mail to accounts[littleanarchy]wikilivres.ca in order to create an account and I got a Delivery Status Notification. Can you help me? Please respond on my talk, via e-mail, or use Ping here. Thanks. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikilivres down
Apache test page All I get is a page confirming that there is a site. "The fact that you are seeing this page indicates that the website you just visited is either experiencing problems or is undergoing routine maintenance." Which one is it? Does Wikilivres have scheduled downtimes? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Down again It looks like DNSEver wants money. Do you know when the site will be back? If you respond here, please use Ping. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks I look forward to it being back. The way Ping works is you type in and then users get notifications at Special:Notifications (you can probably see a little number next to your username at the top of this page). It's not necessary to use it but it keeps me from having to watch a ton of pages just to see if someone responds to me and it also keeps conversations in one place. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Down again Someone on s:Help:Talk:Help:Wikilivres pointed out that there is a notice which reads, "wikilivres.ca Domain Name Service (DNS) has been suspended... from the domain because of overdue payment." —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Once again It's down for me and I checked http://isup.me/ as well. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

And again in 2015 I was just working on Cole Porter, too. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Once more Do you know what is causing this? Will there be more reliable hosting in the future? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Again It's been down for two days. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Usually fixing that is just a matter of clicking a restart button on a tab that's always open. For now, however, the laptop that I was doing this from is getting fixed to replace the plug-in connector for the charger. Since I had to go to a different computer, I had a hard time finding the password that opened the tab. That much is entirely my fault. I can only offer my apologies. Eclecticology (talk) 10:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bollingen Foundation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Frederick Brown and David Paul. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

edit to Raphael dab
You added a Max Raphael to Raphael (disambiguation). There is a Max on wiki but it is a different person, a voice actor not an art historian. I changed it match the wikilink provided. I could not find a Max (historian) article though. Could you see if there is one and add that to the DAB page?-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  17:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624316898 your edit] to Bollingen Foundation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * |[35:52?]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624971074 your edit] to Bollingen Foundation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:42, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * | 2 volumes, text and plates, boxed}

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bollingen Foundation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Harris, T. J. Clark and John Peck. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)