User talk:Ecolabs

Climate Audit
I reverted your deletions of sourced material. Please discuss at that Talk page if you want to try again. --Pete Tillman (talk) 18:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

What is there to say? This is a climate contrarian site with ideological work presented as science. Please do not delete again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecolabs (talk • contribs) 19:00, 7 July 2014‎


 * Any such description needs to be reliably sourced, and discussing changes on the talk page is a good idea. Also, please remember to sign your talk page posts. . dave souza, talk 07:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive editing in Climate Change area
You appear to be making a series of disruptive edits in the Climate Change area. Please be aware that this is a controversial area of Wikipedia, and your edits are subject to Discretionary sanctions, including a ban from editing in this area.

You appear to be a new editor here. You should be aware that there is little tolerance for disruptive editing, and you would be well advised to learn about editing, and the project in general, in a less-controversial area. --Pete Tillman (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Pete assiduously protects contrarian viewpoints in the Climate Change area and is right about the sanctions, so care is needed. When challenged, argue the case on article talk pages, and look for better sources. Not easy when dealing with the alternative universe of contrarian blogs, but has to be done for any changes to stand. I'll put a formal notification about the sanctions below so you're aware of what's involved, you're welcome to ask me for advice but I can't promise to spend a lot of time on this. . . dave souza, talk 07:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

For information, ARBCC alert
dave souza, talk 07:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC)