User talk:Ecoman

see User talk:83.104.37.14 --  getcrunk    juice   contribs  18:30, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The article (EthicalNetwork.org) was deleted a few weeks ago. "Wikipedia is not a web directory" - reinstate the article via deletion review before re-adding it to the list. Thanks. --  getcrunk    juice   contribs  18:42, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- Perfecto 18:48, 27 December 2005 (UTC) P.S. The site is not even live to the public!


 * This user's contributions consist of: adding EthicalNetwork to the List of social networking sites, adding EthicalNetwork to the List of social networking sites, adding EthicalNetwork to the List of social networking sites, adding EthicalNetwork to the List of social networking sites with it's own little section, and adding EthicalNetwork to the List of social networking sites. --  getcrunk    juice   contribs  13:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Hey. EthicalNetwork.org is a social networking site for environmentalists, it really should be on the list. Do stop being such bores by deleting it. I call it vandalism &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by 82.14.89.223 (talk &bull; contribs)

Site name
Your site name is "Ethical Network". Do not add an ".org". People will trust that you have good faith that you are not inviting visitors to come visit your site. If visitors are interested, they will look it up. Please allow this small compromise to resolve this issue. See User talk:Lamborg for more information. -- Perfecto 17:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

List of social networking sites
Regarding this internal list. This page appears as a directory of Wikipedia articles, but the entry you are placing on it does not have an article. Additionally a community consensus decided that the link does not meet the critera for inclusion in the encylopedia (see the Deletion Discussion). Perhaps you were not aware of this deletions. Processes for restoring deleted articles exist, and you may wish to persue them. Adding this link just to make a point that you disagree with the AfD is not constructive. And adding is just to have mention of the external site (noting the edits inlcuding putting the TLD info on the link) is not what the encylopedia is for. You may want to discuss this further on the talk page of the article.
 * xaosflux Talk  / CVU  03:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Please, do not add Ethical Network to the list until you have founded an article about it. --Howrealisreal 14:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * About your addition of EthicalNetwork.org to the artilce List of social networking sites. The link does not belong in the article. If you add it again you will be blocked. Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.--Commander Keane 15:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the Three-revert rule. The reasons why the link could not be added were clear, but ask here if you are confused about why you are blocked. If you violate the 3RR on your return, you may be blocked indefinitely.--Commander Keane 17:01, 24 January 2006 (UTC)