User talk:Ecpiandy/Archive 3

Your request for rollback
Hi TBrandley. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Calmer  Waters  20:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Thanks again. TBrandley 20:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Up All Night Tour
I have expanded the Up All Night Tour could you see Talk:Up All Night Tour/GA1 for my comments. Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 23:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * More again AdabowtheSecond (talk) 06:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Could you please comment on my messages. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * New and final messages (I hope). Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 16:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 7 days have passed :O :) Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 02:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Red links
Hi TBrandley. Just letting you know that red links for potentially notable topics are good to have in an article. They encourage people to create the articles and when they are created the links will already be present. It is not a requirement of GA to remove redlinks. BTW some of your reviews have been mentioned at WT:GAN in case you hadn't noticed. AIR corn (talk) 00:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Tainted Obligation
All issues at Talk:Tainted Obligation/GA1 have been addressed. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 04:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Mmm, thanks for the warm cup of coffee. I really needed it :) TBrandley 15:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bernard Mackenzie Awake TV.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bernard Mackenzie Awake TV.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:58, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

The Little Guy
Hey! Though I think I'm not the right person to make reviews, I still found something on your article. There's a word missing in this sentence of the lead: "It was series creator and executive producer Kyle Killen, and was directed by executive producer Jeffrey Reiner." => It was written by series creator... OR It was series creator and executive producer Kyle Killen who wrote the episode (but then you have to change the rest of your sentence ^^) --Sofffie7 (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * In case you were wondering, I did it myself since you did not react. --Sofffie7 (talk) 21:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

RE:Ricky's Tacos
It might take a bit; I have trouble remembering plot summaries of episodes unless I just saw them. Guy546 ( Talk ) 02:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

X-Files GA Nominations
I just wanted to point out that "Dæmonicus" was no where near ready to be nominated for GA (compared here to here), and considering you did little to no additions, besides adding a picture and a short review, it probably shouldn't have been nominated in the first place. This generally isn't a big deal, but considering you did it to The X-Files main page and did little to nothing to fix the issues, I'd ask that you try to make sure your GANs are completely ready to be reviewed. However, any help you want to give us is great! I just thought I'd tell you, because I don't particularly like having to make a ton of changes just to get the articles to the level they need to be at to pass.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  00:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Talk back


Mr. Slinks ( talk ) 02:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1
Hi, TBrandley. I've read through Awake, and listed several issues at its FAC. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 07:04, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

RE:FAC
I don't really like voting on FAC's, but I can help out on some of the comments if you want. Thanks, Guy546 ( Talk ) 20:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Just a note
Hey, TBrandley. I just thought I'd note that it's not usually the best thing when you ask users to "vote" at an FAC. Consensus has to be established for the article to be promoted, so a user leaving a vague Support !vote won't really incline the FA director/delegates to promote it. It would probably be better to ask users to offer feedback at the FAC. Cheers,  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 20:37, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy
It was inappropriate for you to manually update the article history on that article; and I've undone your changes. Please read WP:FAC/ar where it clearly states not to manually update after the FAC is passes, as it delays bot processing. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 04:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Power Play (Cheers)
Ping, you have replies. --George Ho (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * More at this and that. --George Ho (talk) 23:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I have resolved all issues. I wonder if each passes GA criteria. --George Ho (talk) 16:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
— Hahc 21  19:57, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

.hack GA
Thanks for the review and listing .hack as a GA! I'm planning to take it to FAC soon. Do you have any suggestions for improvement before I take the plunge? Axem Titanium (talk) 00:28, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1
Hey, TBrandley! I've listed several more issues at the review page to be addressed. To make it easier; everything that needs addressing has been emboldened. Also, when you finish an issue, just write done under it; don't strike it because striking is done by me after I make sure the issue has been properly fixed. Thanks,  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 01:50, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Statυs (talk) 05:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

The Warning
Hi, Brandley! I believe that I adressed the issue at The Warning (Eminem song)'s GAN. :) Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 13:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Falling Skies
Just wanted to say thanks for reviewing Worlds Apart. Also, how far are you into reviewing Falling Skies (season 1)? Let Me Eat Cake (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
— Hahc 21  21:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you gonna finish this?. Thanks. — Hahc 21  03:30, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Your reviews
I'm going through the reviews of users in the drive, and yours in particular I'm finding a huge number of issues with. Aside from the ones I already cancelled out, reviews such as Talk:Widerøe Flight 744/GA1, where you went from review to pass in four minutes, shows me that you clearly did not read the article at all. It shows a blatant disregard for the review process, and I would need a compelling reason to not disqualify your drive "efforts" on the spot. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I would also encourage you to respond at WT:GAN to the concerns raised there. At this stage it looks like editors will have to re-review all of your passed articles. AIR corn (talk) 01:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * TBrandley, we have collaborated on WP a lot recently, and I really urge you to respond either here, or at WT:GAN. If you believe your reviews were sufficient, offer your reasoning. If not, apologize for the inconvenience, offer to disqualify your contributions to this month's GA drive, and try to learn from this experience. Ignoring messages will not accomplish anything, because I assume the community will invalidate your reviews if you fail to respond.  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 02:28, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Little Guy
The article The Little Guy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Little Guy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 16:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Awake S01E05.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Awake S01E05.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season
It's been a week since you chose to review this article and I haven't seen any progress. Given that it's the only article you haven't placed on hold yet, will you be reviewing this in the coming days or should I request for a second reviewer? Lemonade51 (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

William (The X-Files)
It looks like Malleus hit on everything I was going to over on the GAN talk page. The review does look better than the ones I've seen so far, so just keep improving and you should be okay. Only part I disagree with him on is the fixing yourself when it's minor; best to list everything, partially as a reminder for the reviewer if it's something they normally miss, but also so it actually "shows your work" for lack of a better term. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Mississippi Highway 198 GAN
I replied to your concern at Talk:Mississippi Highway 198/GA1.  Dough 48  72  00:15, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

William and Season Two
I've addressed all the listed concerns for both "William (The X-Files)" and The X-Files (season 2). The former is waiting on a CE and the latter has already had one.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  02:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Awake
I love the userbox, I'm stealing it, thanks. Ryan Vesey Review me!  18:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Question
Hi, do you plan on waiting up to address the final comments? I should be done in 30-45 minutes. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 04:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok. Comments have been addressed. Thanks, TBrandley 04:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1
I've completed the final comments section, and there are numerous issues to be addressed. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 06:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
—  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   14:09, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 18:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Office Review
I'll let you have the "Diwali" review. :)-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  23:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 22:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Give Peace a Chance (Grey's Anatomy)/GA1
Hi, TBrandley. I know you usually wait a few days before reviewing an article, but can you do this one right away? I nominated it for DYK, and it would be nice to have all the problems fixed before it features on the main page. Thanks,  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 20:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Peer reviews: One at a time,please
Peer review rules, highlighted on the WP:PR page, limit editors to one open review at a time. This restriction is clearly stated (in red) in the instructions that greet you when you open a PR link. Nevertheless, on 21 July you ignored this and opened five reviews. I have closed all of these except the first. Please do not renominate another until the first is clear of the process. Brianboulton (talk) 11:49, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm waiting for you...
...to add content to "Nightswimming" and "Slack Water". Those are the only Awake episode articles that do not content. I'm curious to find when you are going to get to it. QuasyBoy (talk)  22:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Cool. :) QuasyBoy (talk)  02:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

X-Files GA stuff
Just wanted to give you the heads up that I told Glimmer I'd review a handful of his X-Files GAs that he plans on nominating in the future (there's about three or four of them, like "Teliko" and "The Field Where I Died"), and I just thought I'd share that and that you that you don't need to worry about those. :)-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)  15:56, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Opinion
Could you opine on this this matter. Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Comment
It has been almost two days (UTC time) since you signed your name as reviewer for Sadie Harris. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 22:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Sadie Harris GAN
All issues have been addressed,  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 03:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Flight issues have been addressed.  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 05:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)