User talk:Ecremcort

A page you started (Joan Solà i Cortassa) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Joan Solà i Cortassa.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Simply sourcing to a different Wiki is not appropriate. Please provide references, and footnotes for the article, understanding that anything not sourced can be removed immediately.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  TT me 14:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Normes ortogràfiques (December 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Normes ortogràfiques and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Normes ortogràfiques, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Normes_ortogr%C3%A0fiques Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Catr%C3%ACona&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Normes_ortogr%C3%A0fiques reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Catrìona (talk) 16:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Normes ortogràfiques has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Normes ortogràfiques. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 19:12, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Escola Valenciana


The article Escola Valenciana has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced, likely not notable (see WP:GNG and WP:NORG). Content does not appear to correlate with title; may need to move if not deleted."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 19:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, I'm Dorsetonian. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Catalan language, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Consorci per a la Normalització Lingüística


A tag has been placed on Consorci per a la Normalització Lingüística, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Languages Act of Aragon (2013) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Languages Act of Aragon (2013), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  20:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Languages Act of Aragon (2009) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Languages Act of Aragon (2009), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  20:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Languages Act of Aragon (2013)


A tag has been placed on Languages Act of Aragon (2013) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dorsetonian (talk) 08:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CPNL (Consorci per a la Normalització Lingüística)


A tag has been placed on CPNL (Consorci per a la Normalització Lingüística), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Andrew Base (talk) 06:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page,with a heading, or they may be overlooked. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. The fact that it's a translation is irrelevant, each language wikipedia has different rules, and English is generally stricter than others, and even your article title is incorrect here. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing  its management.
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Your text was basically telling us what it claims to do and its goals, but nothing about how it's funded or what it spends. The claim of a million students, a suspiciously rounded figure, seems to have been plucked out of thin air, and is 10 years old anyway


 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, but yours is largely mission statements and goals rather than facts. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: as a platform helping to solve doubts and questions and to write in Catalan. It therefore counts with information about linguistic resources, information about web tools in Catalan and model documents for associations and businesses
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source.
 * the article was a copyright violation. You claim it's a translation, but there is no attribution in the history. Even if the original language text is suitably licensed, you can't just use it without acknowledgement of the source.
 * If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest and writing about yourself.
 * If you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:     . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above, and when you have I'll post the deleted text to Draft:Consorci per a la Normalització Lingüística (the correct title} for you to improve.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:45, 25 November 2019 (UTC)