User talk:Ed!/9

April 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
.--Kumioko (talk) 02:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Louis J. Sebille GA
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I thank you for your contribution to one of wikipedia's latest WP:GA's --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 18:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Heads up
Today's featured article/requests Dabomb87 (talk) 15:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on July 5, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/July 5, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors or his delegate, or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  04:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

 



The Battle of Osan was the first engagement between United States and North Korean forces during the Korean War, on July 5, 1950. A U.S. task force of 400 infantry supported by an artillery battery was moved to Osan, south of the South Korean capital Seoul, and ordered to fight as a rearguard to delay advancing North Korean forces while additional U.S. forces arrived in-country to form a defensive line. The Task Force lacked both antitank guns and effective infantry anti-tank weapons. Aside from a limited number of HEAT shells for the unit's 105-mm howitzers, crew-served weapons capable of defeating the T-34 had not been distributed to U.S. Army forces in Korea at the time. In the first encounter, a North Korean tank column overran the task force and continued its advance south. After the column had successfully breached American lines, the Task Force opened fire on a force of some 5,000 North Korean infantry approaching its position, temporarily holding up the North Korean advance. Eventually, North Korean troops overwhelmed American positions, and the remnants of the Task Force retreated in disorder. (more...)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 00:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Note
Today's featured article/requests Dabomb87 (talk) 15:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Ernest R. Kouma/GA1
Hi in case you don't catch it her is the kink for the GA review Talk:Ernest R. Kouma/GA1. Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ernest R. Kouma
Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance (2)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on August 19, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/August 19, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors or his delegate, or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  04:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

 

The 766th Independent Infantry Regiment was a light infantry regiment of the North Korean People's Army that existed briefly during the Korean War. Trained extensively in amphibious warfare and unconventional warfare, the 766th Regiment was considered a special forces commando unit. Activated in 1949, the regiment trained for more than a year before the outbreak of the war on June 25, 1950. On that day, half of the regiment led North Korean forces against South Korean troops by land and sea, pushing them back after several days of fighting. Over the next six weeks the regiment advanced slowly down the Korean Peninsula, acting as a forward unit of the North Korean army. Suffering lack of supplies and mounting casualties, the regiment was committed to the Battle of Pusan Perimeter as part of a push to force United Nations troops out of Korea. The regiment saw its final action at the Battle of P'ohang-dong, fighting unsuccessfully to take the town from UN troops. (more...)

DYK nom for Edward A. Craig
Hi Ed, I have reviewed your DYK nomination of Edward A. Craig at Template talk:Did you know/Edward A. Craig and I had a few minor quibbles. Could you see my comments at the nomination page? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Kenneth R. Shadrick
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

talkback
- Dank (push to talk) 19:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Your opinion is requested in an open discussion
I invite you to participate in a discussion at Talk:Audie Murphy. Thank you, in advance, Bullmoosebell (talk) 02:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Edward A. Craig
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK nom issues
See Template:Did you know nominations/Action of 27 June 1950. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

==

Your GA nomination of Action of 27 June 1950
The article Action of 27 June 1950 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Action of 27 June 1950 for things which need to be addressed. == Canpark (talk) 12:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Vermont Garrison
Thanx for the photo of Garry Garrison, and an excellent one at that. Images are definitely my shortcoming and I appreciate every one of them somebody contributes. Well done.--Reedmalloy (talk) 00:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

James Jabara GAN
Thank you for reviewing the article. I've responded to all of the issues raised, if you'd like to take another look. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 20:09, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent GA! Well done. — Ed! (talk) 00:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for reviewing. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

1st Provisional Marine Brigade
I'm sorry I didn't have time to get a support in before the article was archived at FAC. OTOH, prose wasn't much of an issue ... what we needed was more people showing up to review, and I'm not sure why that didn't happen, unless it was the fact that the A-class review was so long ago. In order to get some reviewers on board for your next round at FAC, one approach would be to run it through A-class again ... you could say that the technical reason is to review the A-class status. (I've recommended peer review a couple of times when A-class articles failed at FAC, but that hasn't worked well, we don't enough reviewers at peer review.) - Dank (push to talk) 06:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I changed my mind ... I don't think it would hurt in this case, but in general, we probably shouldn't encourage people to bring their own articles back through A-class a second time. So, either peer review or straight back to FAC (any time after the mandatory 2-week wait.) - Dank (push to talk) 02:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Air Battle of South Korea
The article Air Battle of South Korea you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Air Battle of South Korea for things which need to be addressed.Canpark (talk) 13:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 15:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895) again at Featured article candidacies
Hey Ed!, I see you were a reviewer at one of Sevastopol's many reviews. As it's last FAC was closed due to low participation, I"d like you to come and review it for it's current FAC, in order to get a better picture of its current situation. Thanks, Buggie111 (talk) 02:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Talk:United Nations Security Council Resolution 82/GA1
I've posted my review there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 03:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Osan
Hi Ed, I was browsing the above article after reading the one about Sharick and noticed this edit, which seems to contradict the Shadrick article. As it was added with a reference, I'm guessing it's not correct but seems to have slipped through the net. Nev1 (talk) 17:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It's an odd situation. I wanted to include in this article that Shadrick was wrongly ID'd as the first soldier killed in combat, and indeed the initial reports were that Shadrick had died as Osan, when in fact he died at a minor engagement slightly to the south at the same time. So, I was trying to reflect that at Battle of Osan. — Ed! (talk) 18:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Nev1 (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Reviewing your work
Hi Ed!. This isn't meant to be hostile, but, I feel blocked in reviewing your work because of the Battle of the Bowling Alley FAC. Given that I haven't been reviewing much recently, I'm not "up to date." Could you reassure me? Fifelfoo (talk) 02:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know what you mean. — Ed! (talk) 15:31, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * When Battle of the Bowling Alley went through FAC there was consternation and panic about the use of PD material as body text. I've checked this two or three times before mentioning it, as I remember my personal feeling of shock (having supported the FAC).  Fifelfoo (talk) 22:12, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. Well, I stopped that practice after that FAC and I've been looking at how to rework that article (and a small number of others, admittedly) to remove the problem. — Ed! (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * This is exactly what I hoped I'd hear, and makes me feel confident I can review your articles at MILHIST A and FAC! Fifelfoo (talk) 04:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

United Nations Security Council Resolution 82 is now a GA!
Congrats! I'd like to interest you in reviewing some GA from your area of interest (see WP:GAN) for the full list, so we can deal with our 2-3 months backlog :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 17:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review! Actually, I was thinking of working on some more GA noms to add fodder for reviewers in the upcoming GAN backlog elimination drive. I'll be reviewing then, too. — Ed! (talk) 17:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * John F. Bolt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * was linked to Tail number

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Dolphin D. Overton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links to Number 13, Captain (military), Distinguished Flying Cross and Tail number

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Image problem
Hi there appears to be some sort of problem with this image File:Dolph Overton 2009.JPG Jim Sweeney (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Mark up error
Hi, Ed, there appears to be a html mark up error in Note 2 of Dolphin D. Overton: "In 2000 this award was made retroactive to all US military who served in the Korean War". I'm not exactly sure how to fix it, sorry. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I've fixed it. — Ed! (talk) 21:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Cheers, that was quick work. AustralianRupert (talk) 21:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Dolphin D. Overton
As you have five or more DYK credits, you'll need to review another article at DYK before your nomination can be approved, per the QPQ rule: "Review requirement – Reviewing another editor's nomination is part of the nomination process for self-nominations. This makes it more likely that all nominations are reviewed in a timely manner. You may add your nomination before you undertake a review, but before it is approved, please review another editor's nomination and indicate at your nomination which you have reviewed, and (if you know how to do this) provide a link to the diff for your review. New nominators (those with fewer than five DYK credits) are exempt from this review requirement, as is the nomination of another editor's article. For help in learning the reviewing process, see the reviewers' guide." Once you've done this, just reply at the nomination page, stating what you have reviewed. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.  Harrias  talk 01:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 01:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Dolphin D. Overton
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * USS Boxer (CV-21) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links to Glenview, Illinois, Far East Air Force, Task Force 77, Newport, Virginia and Operation Hardtack


 * Syngman Rhee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to Japanese


 * USS Philippine Sea (CV-47) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to Decommissioned

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:26, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Congrats!

 * Much thanks! — Ed! (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Apollo 13 update
Improvements are commencing. Asking others to help out on it. RAP (talk) 19:29 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Very good. Please keep updating the review page to let me know how things are coming along. — Ed! (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Cough
As the commons caption of this photo points out, the US Marines don't have their own medical personnel. US Navy doctors and medics take care of them. Pumpkin Sky  talk  03:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ahh. Thank you for the clarity. — Ed! (talk) 02:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 10th Mountain Division (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)