User talk:Ed!/Reviews


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * 2) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * 3) It is broad in its coverage:
 * 4) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * 5) It is stable:
 * 6) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * 7) Other:
 * 1) It is stable:
 * 2) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * 3) Other:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * 2) Other:
 * 1) Other: