User talk:Ed.Vallejo

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

AXJ is not spamming anyone. We are simply publishing facts:
AXJ is not spamming anyone. We are simply publishing facts:

Providing a website featuring news and information in the fields of national and international politics; advertising and commercial information services via the internet; and online retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods for others.

Hosting an online community website of reporters and commentators featuring news and information in the fields of national and international politics

035 - Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions. - Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions.

042 - Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; legal services. - Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; legal services.


 * Usernames that imply shared or official use are not permitted. A username must represent an individual. A name like " at AXJNEWS" would be acceptable, but the username requested would be just as unacceptable. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 06:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter how good AXJ is, it's not allowed a group account at Wikipedia, simply because *no* company, organization or group is. Individuals at organizations can have individual accounts, but an organization as a whole can not. Please read WP:CORPNAME, and follow the instructions you have been given. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kind reply. But what makes an entry in Wiki different between CNN, FOX, or AXJ? For example, AXJ CROATIA argues that Nikola Tesla is Croatian and not Serbian.
 * You need to distinguish between encyclopedia articles and user accounts. If an organization is sufficiently notable (see WP:NORG for notability requirements) then Wikipedia can carry an article about it, but the organization is not allowed a user account in its name. So we have, for example, an article about CNN (written independently by disinterested contributors), but CNN does not have its own user account at User:CNN. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:36, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for the clarification. So then it is ok if our AXJ Reporters and Journalist publish on Wiki using their own user accounts but not as AXJ, correct?
 * Essentially yes, but see below for further explanation. But one other thing you need to know is that Wikipedia is not a news publisher and so reporters can not use it to publish their own news coverage. People from your organization can edit Wikipedia to help us build the encyclopedia, subject to the conditions I have outlined. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I have globally renamed AXJNEWS to Ed.Vallejo, and I'll leave the actual unblock request for someone else to review. As an employee you would be considered a "paid editor" and would have to follow the rules at WP:PAID (including making the appropriate declarations). You would also be considered to have a conflict of interest and would need to abide by the policy at WP:COI. Finally, no, you would not be accorded any "authorized" status - Wikipedia's policy is that all editors have equal status and none has any official or authorized privileges over any other. Wikipedia articles are developed by referring to reliable sources (see WP:RS) and any disagreements that might arise are resolved by discussion and consensus, and not by any official authority. I hope this helps - it's tricky to understand the rules, but they are there to try to keep the encyclopedia neutral and to keep the editorial authority in the hands of Wikipedia's community of editors. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Socking
See User talk:AXJ.NEWS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * As I said on the puppet page, heartily recommend no unblock.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I see this account is now globally locked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)