User talk:EdJF

WP:Food
It would be appreciated if you joined in the conversation ongoing at WT:Food regarding the layout and presentation of the project's main page. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about An American Journey: My Life on the Field, In the Air, and On the Air
Hello, EdJF,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether An American Journey: My Life on the Field, In the Air, and On the Air should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An American Journey: My Life on the Field, In the Air, and On the Air.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Green Cardamom (talk) 19:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Falls Park
Hi - thanks for the thanks ! I do a lot of copy-editingEugene-elgato (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Falls Park
Hi - thanks for the thanks ! I do a lot of copy-editingEugene-elgato (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Warren Sandel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warren Sandel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Warren Sandel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Please comment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#Bullpen_catchers Alex (talk) 05:44, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

RfC
Since you are a partcipant of WikiProjects Airports, your inputs could be useful here. Pathmaraman (talk) 03:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Edit-warring on Mitch McConnell
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Multiple issues
You appear to have just put a notice on the page of User:Snoog on his Talk page. This appears to be his 3rd incident over five days, first with Peter Navarro, then Mitch McConnell as you have documented, and now on another page he is editing. Did you see this on his Talk page? CodexJustin (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for alerting me to these issues. I didn't pay any attention to his page other than inserting the warning on edit warring yesterday.EdJF (talk) 18:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Deceptive edit summary and whitewashing
The editor EdJF removed RS content about how Esper directed overseas military commanders not to make any decisions to protect their troops without giving advance notice and receiving approval from the White House, with the goal of not contradicting messaging from the President. The editor stated the text was not supported by the cited source, which is a falsehood. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 12:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Scranton, Pennsylvania
I reverted your edit at Scranton, Pennsylvania. The article for John Anthony Walker only says he attended school in Scranton. Are you able to find a source supporting that he lived in Scranton "for a significant amount of time", per WP:USCITIES? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, multiple. Although Walker was born in Washington DC, the extended Walker family was from Scranton which is where John Walker was "raised". BTW, what about the other 22? EdJF (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

General sanctions alert for Covid 19
Doug Weller talk 18:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Improving the General Dynamics Wikipedia article
Hi EdJF, I noticed you're part of WP:Virginia and like military topics. I'm currently working on the General Dynamics Wikipedia article, there is room for improvement on a few sections. I have a COI with General Dynamics, so I will not edit the article myself but will present conceptual improvements on the talk page. To start, I rewrote the lead paragraph to clarify what the company does. Here is my proposed version. Any thoughts on this? --Chefmikesf (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falwell Airport has been accepted
 Falwell Airport, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Falwell_Airport help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! – robertsky (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Patrick Mahomes. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your changes have been reverted multiple times now. If you continue there is a strong possibility you will be partially blocked from the article.'' ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Disambiguation link notification for May 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Saluga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inherit the Wind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee,  141 Pr  {contribs} 08:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
Very nice. Thank you.EdJF (talk) 18:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)