User talk:EdOnRoll

Thanks for the edits on Data Loss Prevention!
I see your point regarding the "See also" section that article. I'm no fan of the companies listed there now, but there's a big problem with trying to list them all. Let's talk about this at Talk:Data_Loss_Prevention, so other editors can chime in. Glad to see someone else giving the article some attention!

--- tqbf 15:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the response.

These companies do not represent cream of the crop in Data Loss Prevention. These are just big players in the computer security. It is not a law, that there should be a section with commercial providers.


 * I agree with the sentiment; however, by convention, related WP pages often do link to each other. The argument can be made that those vendor links belong.
 * Remember that the WP is never going to be complete; that list is never going to be "perfect".
 * In the meantime, another response is to say, "if major vendors there don't have articles to link to, add stub articles for them".
 * I'm not going to revert your change; I prefer the article without links. From what I can tell, the market breakdown on DLP systems is Vontu/SYMC, then Verdasys, then Vericept, then MCAF, then Tablus/RSA. --- tqbf  04:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)