User talk:Eddideigel

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Welcome, newcomer! Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:


 * First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
 * When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
 * Remember to use a neutral point of view!
 * If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:


 * Policy Library, Utilities, Cite your sources, Verifiability, Wikiquette, Civility, Conflict resolution, Brilliant prose, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense, Village pump, Boilerplate text

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page. You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: &#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;.

Best of luck, and have fun! ClockworkTroll 17:51, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thanks
Just a note to thank you for calling for answers to the complaints filed by me and others against the arbitrators. It seems that we will get an answer now, thanks to your effort. Mange takk, Shorne 12:21, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Ingen årsak. (Don't mention it.) Although I second Leif's comment that you may be hurting your own case, there is all reason to speed up the handling of it. Just for the record I take no party &mdash; if you are right, serious action; if you are wrong, serious action, too &mdash; but since the case may harm the system itself it should really be expedited. --Eddi 13:23, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Ja, vi er enige. Shorne 16:56, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Any development? --Eddi 20:44, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * I haven't heard a word from anyone, no. Have you? Shorne 01:22, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Nope. --Eddi 17:52, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Thank you for your comments about the infoboxes. As the person who made all of them, I came to check my watchlist to see them all systematically deleted after my hours of work. I have commented on Gzornenplatz's talk page asking him for the reasons behind his change, and warning him taht if he cannot justify his actions, I will revert all of the pages to the versions with the infoboxes. I'll keep you posted on the situation if you'd like. Páll 00:15, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I'd like to be updated if it's not too much trouble. I noticed the war over the Norway infobox and assumed there would be similar situations elsewhere. I haven't made up my mind yet if I prefer the infoboxes or not (I probably do), but an edit war is bad anyhow. --Eddi 00:29, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hi, there's a new Solution E that's been proposed for the country infoboxes; I've changed my vote from the Solution D that I proposed, earlier. The new option, proposed by User:Zocky, transcludes a subpage instead of using the template mechanism for this. See: Nepal's infobox is implemented at Nepal/infobox using Template:Infobox_Country; Tuvalu's is implemented at Tuvalu/infobox as a wiki table.

Discussion is at: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Countries voting: Country_infobox_vote

Thanks. &mdash; Davenbelle 02:46, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)


 * I selected (C) because it is simpler than (A), but changes of country information are still visible in the country article history. The latter is not the case with (E). Thank you anyway. --Eddi 18:24, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Understood. The all-together approach seems to be most people's issue; to me, the large block of non-wiki text up front is more annoying. Changing to a template only changes the nature of this up-front clutter and only reduces the amount of it slightly. I would think that the off-putting effect of this on non-technical people would be more compelling. &mdash; Davenbelle 22:53, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

Voting for standardization
Hi. I'm oo64eva. We're holding a vote here to standardize the table and color template. If you have any questions leave a message on my talk page or on the project talk page. Spread the word about the vote, it ends May 12th at 3:40 UTC. &mdash; oo64eva (Alex) (U @ 04:22, May 9, 2005 (UTC)

Counties of Norway
Wikipedia has very specific rules for the application of categories. Specifically, Category:Counties of Norway is already a subcategory of Category:Norway, so an article cannot be simultaneously filed in both categories. Bearcat 00:08, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

OK, I didn't know that – and I guess many with me. Those rules may not always be practical, I think, but I'll leave it to that. --Eddi (Talk)  08:22, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

The Geography of Nynorsk
I apologise that I wrote in the Nynorsk entry that Nynorsk was more common to the northwest of Norway. My intention, not totally expressed in what I wrote, was for the reader in English to understand the roots of Nynorsk per Aasen's work and that it is more rural while Bokmål is more urban. On second review of what I wrote, you are right that it was (unintentionally) misleading and I do apologise and it has been amended. I would very much like to see the Nynorsk entry greatly expanded and ask you to work with me on that if you like.--Mike 07:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

No problem. See Talk:Nynorsk. --Eddi (Talk)  21:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

The flag of Greater Melbourne
The flag is in fact a Nordic cross if you check. I wondered if it really was a Nordic cross myself so I quicly measured it on my screen and the vertical part of the cross is shifted slightly to the hoist side (there is about 5mm difference) this makes it a nordic cross. :)Inge 23:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Measuring on screen is not very accurate. And of course it depends on the quality of the image file itself. I suggest taking such information from verifiable text sources, not measuring images. --Eddi (Talk)  23:39, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Yes. It's also listed here, but that really doesn't make it any better. Inge 23:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Not much, no. But you could ask about the source from the person who listed it there. --Eddi (Talk)  23:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Here FOTW has a bit about the Greater Sydney flag which has the same design principles as the Greater Melbourne flag. It states that the cross is offset "to create a 1:2 ratio flag and a 1:2 canton" in order to make the ship look better etc. So I don't know...the cross is offset, but it really isn't in the spirit of a Nordic cross :) Inge 00:00, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Doesn't seem the spirit, no. It even states that the intention is to make it look centered. However, after never setting foot in FOTW before, I have grown very sceptic towards it and its mirrors from just a few lookups today. --Eddi (Talk)  00:19, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

They include everything and anything. And it is very difficult to know what to trust when it comes to the unofficial flags. But at least the ones about official flags like this one and this one about Norway are very comprehensive and trustworthy. Inge 00:31, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * In that case I suggest references to FOTW for official flags, but not for unofficial ones. Of course one may use FOTW to locate other sources, but I don't think it should be referenced itself for the unofficial flags. By the way, at Talk:Gallery of flags by design I have proposed that the flags of Greatern Melbourne and the Hong Kong Baptists should be removed from the section on Scandinavian crosses. --Eddi (Talk)  00:52, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Nynorsk
Thank you for your answer. — Staatenloser 16:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

The Movement
What does this one think of the movement? --Kin Khan 02:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

This one has no opinion on the movement, but dislikes unsolicited campaigning. --Eddi (Talk) 04:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks....
....for the translation of the subtitles and your friendly words; --Hesse1309 17:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

I gladly help promoting Norway to a bigger audience. Hope you didn't find the removal of the credits too harsh. --Eddi (Talk) 18:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Region?
We need to review the terms used for various types of regions of Norway, esp. the current erroneous term "landscape", but also landsdel and tettsted. See for instance Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Norway. -- Egil 16:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Periodic Table
Template:Element looks great, and the coding for Template:Periodic_table sure looks better now too. Template_talk:Element says it's still in testing and shouldn't be used in namespace articles yet. Is this still true? If not, please remove this warning from the talk page. Flying Jazz 02:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks in all respects. Now, I had almost forgotten about the element template. Please note that it's intended for element articles and not related to element cell, the template used in the Periodic table (standard). It has been tested, but never intoduced in namespace, and not developed in pace with the element articles. Other templates rule the namespace &mdash; see the lengthy discussion at WikiProject Elements, and the collection of templates at Special:Allpages/Template:Elementbox with instructions at WikiProject Elements. Although not very precise I think the warning can remain for the time being. --Eddi (Talk) 03:01, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Whuh?
I still need help. What part of that template is what I want and what isn't? It's all very confuzzling. Please to be helping me isolate one square so with which I can build upon. --Homfrog 14:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

In the Periodic table (standard) the table framework is outlined using wiki table format, starting with {| and ending with |}. Between these delimiters, rows start with |- and cells start with | or ! (the last causing bold font). Inside the table cells, in this case, the data is written using another template, namely Template:Element cell, which sets up the data with colours and borders. See example to the right. The code of that cell is:

Instead of using the element cell template, we could have written the following code:

So the latter part is perhaps what examplifies a table cell. --Eddi (Talk) 17:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanx! You earn your vanilla {french accent} crossiant! {english} And now I'll go do something. Bye. Homfrog 21:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Election-table2
I like the new template you made. I will use it instead of election-table in future. Electionworld 19:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Glad you like it. But as you can see, election-table2 is basically a copy of election-table – only with text-align:right and without the leading row. I really hate repetition of attributes, so when I can put them in a header I'm happy. :) Hope you find the instructions useful, too. --Eddi (Talk) 23:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

The template has further developed, I now use electiontable. Electionworld = Wilfried (talk 21:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

It looks fine. Remember to include an instruction page. --Eddi (Talk) 00:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Progress Party
Heisann,

thanks for mediating on the Progress Party page. I was wondering whether you could comment on the talk page (Heptor has not replied yet). I pointed out 4 points, maybe you can elaborate on what you think of those?

"We snakes", --Orzetto 18:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Prego. However, I'd rather not comment before both sides have presented their views. Hope that's OK with you. --Eddi (Talk) 22:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you :)
Hi, thank you for telling me... I am surprised anyone noticed, as I removed it within minutes.... But hey, I'll learn. You were ol just between my posting and deleting?

Jordskjelv

Anonymous (IP) users are most suspicious. Next in line are registered users without a user page, i.e. red link on the user name. Personally I don't pay attention to anonymous edits that cancel each other, but registered edits that cancel each other are different. Especially malicious edits. --Eddi (Talk) 02:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)  PS: You may sign and date your comment automatically with 4 tildes like ~ 

Image
Would it be okay for me to upload a special one image of my own? Like say, of how I depict myself? Thanks, Homfrog 00:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

I guess so, if it fits one of the image licenses listed at the upload page. If you have made the image yourself, you may for instance choose "GFDL (self made)". It is recommended that material on your user page should be related to Wikipedia or your work at Wikipedia, but I think the interpretation of this is quite wide. See User page for more details. --Eddi (Talk) 01:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Link color
Hey, uh, just a quick one while I'm away. *ahem* OOHHHH, WHAT COLOR IN HEX ARE THE LINKS THAT SHINE TO OUR OWN WEBSITE? DO YOU CAN YOU UNDERSTAND?? *coughcough* Well, uh, I'm expecting an answer please. Homfrog 00:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Blue... eh... 0000FF...? Probably not. Perhaps common.css will shine some light on the riddle. If it doesn't, you may extinguish your thirst at the village pump. --Eddi (Talk) 02:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Non-proliferation and Norway
I've an interest in nuclear policy, hence being drawn to that (that and noting Leifern's POV editing there). I suspect there is much more to the politicians' acts and policies, but that is actually an interesting story, and seems to me worth a very small mention. It is a pity it was stuck on the stubborn desire to denigrate that Leifern alo seems to have for the main subject of the article. And me. And Geni... Shall we see if whoever put the original entry into it ha a view, or someone else from outside? Midgley 00:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

For some years after WWII Norway exported supplementary, non-fissile materials to certain countries, and from time to time there has been some debate on whether or not to allow allied vessels carrying nuclear reactors or weapons in Norwegian waters. However, I don't think Norwegian policy on nuclear technology has changed significantly for several decades. At least I can't recall any shifts in policy between the 1980's and the 70's or 90's. So that part would probably have to go. As to name calling I will not have it on my page, whoever it is. I welcome factual disputes, but no personal attacks please. --Eddi (Talk) 02:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

New municipal and regional emblems after 2007?
Hello Eddi(e)! I hope you are doing well. Here's a question that you may be able to answer. :) // Big Adamsky  •  BA's talk page 14:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, same. I have a couple of thoughts, but I would like to do some checking before putting them on screen. See you later. --Eddi (Talk) 17:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Userbox Help
Back again. Anyways. One of my userboxes is mis-aligned. Between the color orange and the District of Columbia. Could you fix it? Thanks. --Homfrog 13:19, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

I think there are too many boxes and too many types of boxes. Boxes of different types don't necessarily mix well, especially if the heights or widths are different. It might help if you sort the boxes by themes and/or sizes. You may also insert some  if you want any hard line breaks. I made some tests on your page while checking the situation, but I didn't try to fix the alignment problem. --Eddi (Talk) 15:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Erbium
You'll be interested in this talk re the 'bot attacks' on erbium. So a stub at erbium with a correct interlanguage link from erbium might help to fix things. Start working! :) Femto 11:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. (I've been out of woffice for a few days.) I might contribute to a stub at no:erbium, but it's no solution to the real problem. I'll watch the discussion you're referring to. --Eddi (Talk) 23:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:Element
I recently noticed how many templates it takes to create an infobox for a single element, and it could be reduced to one with the proper code. I saw that you began to create Template:Element to try to combine all the templates currently being used. Are you still actively working on that endeavor? --MZMcBride 22:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 * See also my comments at Template talk:Elementbox header. No opposition from me, now that we have parser functions. Femto 12:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * While working on element templates at nn: and no: I looked for ideas at en: and other places and found a multitude of templates. I created a single template at nn: that was translated to en: and tested on a small scale, but it was only implemented at nn: and not developed further at en:. At the time there was some debate on ease of use of single templates versus form and function of multiple templates, but now I'm not sure if the user friendliness was that different after all. Anyway, the Elements WikiProject takes care of business and I'm not worried about the templates. Sorry for my late response. Thanks to Femto for noticing. --Eddi (Talk) 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

No
Have you left the norwegian Wikipedia? Why? NorwegianMarcus 19:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm still present both here and there, but I don't write that much any longer. No particular reason, I think, except for the kid losing interest in the new toy after a while. Thanks for visiting though. --Eddi (Talk) 00:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * ) Sounds good. NorwegianMarcus 16:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: AWB Feature Request "Change ordinal º to degree ° ..."
Change ordinal º to degree ° and remove space between ° and C or F

Is now added. Can you just check the diffs for me to confirm?

Cheers

Reedy Boy 19:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

The diff looks fine. As long as false positives are prevented, the tool will make the right changes. Thanks. --Eddi (Talk) 18:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Flag of Lewis
A "" template has been added to the article Flag of Lewis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MRM 20:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

My contribution was actually a tag about lack of reference and possible inaccuracy, so I have no comment to the deletion of the article. --Eddi (Talk) 22:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Wide periodic table layout
Any thoughts about using the inline periodic table as the default version for Wikipedia? See Talk:Periodic table (standard). Flying Jazz 18:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * It's probably OK. At this time I'm afraid can't tell which effect it would have, if any, so I can't comment on the actual case. I'm sorry for not replying earlier. Eddi (Talk) 04:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Element cell i
A tag has been placed on Template:Element cell i requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * It's probably OK. At this time I'm afraid can't tell which effect it would have, if any, so I can't comment on the actual case. I'm sorry for not replying earlier. Eddi (Talk) 04:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Element master
A tag has been placed on Template:Element master requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * It's probably OK. At this time I'm afraid can't tell which effect it would have, if any, so I can't comment on the actual case. I'm sorry for not replying earlier. Eddi (Talk) 04:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed merge of isotope tables
As someone who has maintained Isotope table (complete) and/or Isotope table (divided) in the past, your input is needed. User:Greg L is proposing (and prematurely executing) a merge of the two tables, each about 50k, into one table of over 100k. I am opposing it, and no other editors have commented yet. Please come to Talk:Isotope table (complete) and offer your opinion. Thanks, JWB (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Merger
Eddi: What do you think about option #3, which would keep the best of both worlds and would leave only one article? In case other options get added and the numbering gets changed, here is a historical version to show which option I’m talking about. Greg L (my talk) 20:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

FAC: List of elements by stability of isotopes
Hey, in case you still care, there is a page started by you that is now under FLC review at Featured list candidates/List of elements by stability of isotopes. If you would like, you may leave some comments. Nergaal (talk) 07:44, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * How about now? Nergaal (talk) 08:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. A suggestion for further detail, see project page. Note: I have not studied the whole article, so this is just a whiff among others. --Eddi (Talk) 11:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've modified the article according to your suggestion. What do you think of the article now for FL? Nergaal (talk) 14:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

The table looks very nice! But I have not considered the FL criteria, so there may be issues I don't know about. --Eddi (Talk) 23:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Supersubscript_fontsize.png
Thanks for uploading File:Supersubscript_fontsize.png I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 05:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Please see User talk:MBisanz

File permission problem with File:Supersubscript_fontsize_1.png
Thanks for uploading File:Supersubscript_fontsize_1.png I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 05:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Please delete this old page
Hi, I noticed that you last edited User:Eddideigel/Fantasticum two years ago. It's using Element which no longer exists in the form you're trying to use it in - there is another template now that reports errors if it's used incorrectly. If you could please remove the page (assuming you're no longer using it), the error would disappear from my list. Thanks!
 * — SkyLined (talk) 10:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Please see User talk:SkyLined. Eddi (Talk) 04:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Or even simpler, removing the template from the page would fix things as well. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 08:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * This has been resolved some time ago, so don't worry about it :).    — SkyLined (talk) 22:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Eddideigel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jørgen Kosmo -


 * Please see Talk:Jørgen Kosmo. Eddi (Talk) 04:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The reference is now included in the article. Eddi (Talk) 00:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Iso-test


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 02:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * At this time I can't really comment on the deletion, but I assume it caused no harm. I'll comment on the tone of the notice, however, which is poorly addressed. I'd say Mhiji is the one who could learn a few things at the welcome page. Eddi (Talk) 16:53, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Creation of the article "2019 in Norway" in English Wikipedia
Hello, Eddideigel. Happy New Year to you! 2019 is coming soon. Can you creat the article "2019 in Norway" in English Wikipedia? Thanks a lot! 123.150.182.180 17:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, that's not my area of expertise. Eddi (Talk) 21:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Element color legend/metal–nonmetal range
Template:Element color legend/metal–nonmetal range has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Element color/1
Template:Element color/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Other deprecated Element color templates which you've created are also nominated. Gonnym (talk) 11:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Element cell-1
Template:Element cell-1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Element cell-large
Template:Element cell-large has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)