User talk:EddieLu

Image copyright problem with Image:IrishMap1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IrishMap1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User Corsican Ancestry
A tag has been placed on Template:User Corsican Ancestry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User Gibraltarian Ancestry
A tag has been placed on Template:User Gibraltarian Ancestry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User Welsh Ancestry
A tag has been placed on Template:User Welsh Ancestry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Genealogy
I am extending this invitation to you because you are listed as a Wikipedian genealogist. WikiProject Genealogy seems to have ground to a halt, and I'm hoping to either "reboot" it or, if interest is lacking, eliminate it. If you are so inclined, please visit "This project's purpose" topic in WikiProject Genealogy Talk at your earliest convenience and respond to my comment. (You might have to scroll down a bit; my comment is mostly boldfaced.) If you are not willing or able to participate, please [mailto:johnarigali@aim.com notify me of such in email], and I won't disturb you further about this matter. Thank you. -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 07:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Dundalk Cricket Club

 * There wasn't anything in the article to indicate that the club is notable per WP:ORG or WP:ATHLETE. "they were mentioned in the July 2010 issue of The Wisden Cricketer" isn't an assertion of notability per those standards.  See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm not going to get into an argument, but I find it laughable that Wikipedia thinks it's above Wisden when it comes to cricketing matters. Mention in Wisden for any club or player is a very big deal in the cricket world, we are currently in the running for Wisden Club of the month for September.

The governing body of Cricket in Ireland "Cricket Ireland" thought we were notable enough to be mentioned in their 2010 Development Report, there was also the matter of our reaching the semi-final of a major trophy competition. EddieLu (talk) 13:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:User Gibraltarian Ancestry
Template:User Gibraltarian Ancestry, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Gibraltarian Ancestry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:User Gibraltarian Ancestry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:29, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:User Gibraltarian Ancestry


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dundalk Cricket Club for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dundalk Cricket Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dundalk Cricket Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:59, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

More Dundalk Cricket Club
My suspicion is that your article isn't going to survive the deletion process and on the strict rules that's probably right. But it bothers me as a member of the CricketProject here that there seems to be a concerted deletionist campaign against cricket club articles (much of it by people who've not seemed to take much interest in cricket until now) and that information gets lost. To that end, I've taken the liberty of copying and pasting some of the info in the club article across to the section on Sport in the article on Dundalk. It could, though, still do with a reference or two, and I think you're better placed than I am to do that. Kind regards. Johnlp (talk) 17:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks John, I've updated the points total.

I think that yes maybe the Dundalk article is where the information belongs.

Good outcome. EddieLu (talk) 22:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Dundalk Cricket Club
Don't be too disheartened, articles come and go, unfortunately that's the way of things on here (I'll admit I tend to be a deletionist. It's good to see new editors with an interest in cricket, I know people can be put off by the faceless procedures on here.  But there's a whole world of cricket on here that still needs addressing.  There's still cricketers who need articles on List of Irish first-class cricketers, notable cricket grounds on List of cricket grounds in Ireland that need expanding with new information and referencing.  The Ireland cricket team and Cricket in Ireland articles need constant updating, so there's plenty to do.  There's thousands of notable cricketers on User:Bobo192's lists, one of our more long-term projects.  Anyhow, I like to see people with an interest stick around on here, the more the merrier I say! Don't be too disheartened about the Dundalk article. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)