User talk:EddieRox

Important notice
Why are you doing this? ╟─TreasuryTag► Lord Speaker ─╢ 17:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Important notice
You are now listed to be blocked from editing, since you cannot seem to follow the rules and have refused to discuss your behaviour. Please do not insert original resarch onto any page at all, any more. Thanks. ╟─TreasuryTag► directorate ─╢ 16:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cuddlydating.com
A tag has been placed on Cuddlydating.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JNW (talk) 02:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. ╟─TreasuryTag► duumvirate ─╢ 16:37, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ╟─TreasuryTag► Lord Speaker ─╢ 16:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ╟─TreasuryTag► directorate ─╢ 16:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing
for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I've blocked your account. You have been asked to discuss your edits, and you have failed to do so. Inserting facts that aren't derived from reliable sources is considered original research, which cannot be posted on Wikipedia. Despite being told this, above, you continued to post such material at Human Nature (Doctor Who episode), which is disruptive. I'm happy to remove your block if you will agree to discuss your edits, and the material you wish to add, at Talk:Human Nature (Doctor Who episode); otherwise, the block will expire in 12 hours. Either way, once you are unblocked, you must not post unreferenced information at any article; continuing to do so may result in a lengthier block. Please discuss these issues with us, so we can come to a consensus on the article and move forward. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 17:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ckatz chat spy  20:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello, . This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.     Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag► Captain-Regent ─╢ 21:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing to insert unsourced content into articles in the manner described by UltraExactZZ above, per WP:ANI report. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.  Sandstein  19:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Feb 2010
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MarnetteD | Talk 17:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Audio theatre an article to audio dramas
Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it), please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 03:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)