User talk:EddyM74

Regarding your edits to Adriana Sage
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

"Financial crisis of 2007–201X" deleted
Hi, the page "Financial crisis of 2007–201X" has been deleted under speedy deletion criterion A10 because it was a copy of Financial crisis of 2007–2010. Duplicate articles covering the same topic should not be added to Wikipedia, because it confuses readers, and makes the editorial process difficult. There is also the issue of content forking. Alternate titles are often resolved by redirects, but in this case I would not recommend it as "201X" appears to be a novel term which is unlikely to be searched for. Sjakkalle (Check!)  13:59, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Vitamin articles
I notice that you have been repeatedly adding a section about oncology to several vitamin articles. However, the text of your addition does not make any sense. It is simply not coherent English. I'm not disputing that you have something to add to the article, just that it needs to be first written in a way that is understandable. If English is not your primary language, and you would like some assistance drafting a paragraph, please let me know and I'll try to help. In the meantime, please do not simply add the same content to multiple articles again until the language issues are worked out. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:52, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Jenna Haze appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. X X X antiuser eh? 07:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Jenna Haze, you may be blocked from editing. X X X antiuser eh? 07:25, 15 April 2011 (UTC)