User talk:Eddymason


 * Archive 1

RE:Reward Board
Hey! Thank you for helping me out with the article. It is a difficult name, so you can try searching for our parent company and some of our board members for news. Here are some links I found:

https://www.internetretailer.com/2011/06/02/systemax-subsidiary-beefs-its-canadian-web-site http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=340260&ticker=SYX http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/18/nyregion/systemax-rides-an-online-sales-wave.html

Let me know if this helps.

JWalk6 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Looks great. Now how do I award barnstar? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JWalk6 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for all your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JWalk6 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Random question - any way to add a location/map tap to the article? Thank youJWalk6 (talk) 18:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

your edit at Circumcision article
I agree that this bizarre aspect of Circumcision should be mentioned within the Circumcision article. Zadly I predict that one of 5 particular editors will shortly write here telling you that they have reverted your edit as the infected and infecting mohels story is "covered" in the sub article on circumcisions within that religion. There is a concerted effort to keep a most positive tone about Circumcision within the main wikipedia article for some reason I have yet to determine.....--— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 20:37, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Amaury. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Abortion debate— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 04:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm kind of puzzled on how to go about this. Recently you've done some edits that are in conflict with other edits you've done, namely that you've linked to User:Badmachine, which gives off the impression that you are Badmachine. (If you are, then you need to go through Arbcom to be unblocked since they are the only people who can do this.) You've also created an article that you said was created by a sock of Badmachine and you've vandalized Abortion debate. I'm somewhat getting the impression that your account may have been hacked or otherwise accessed by someone else, so if that's the case then I've blocked the account to keep them from continuing to make these edits under your username. What you need to do with this is to try to reset your password as soon as possible. If you've created an account with an e-mail (which it looks like you have), you can request your password be reset via e-mail if the password has been changed. If your e-mail has also been hacked and the password changed, you can try e-mailing  to see what you can do about getting this account back. Once that's done, you can come back on here and request for this block to be lifted. I have no problems with this being lifted once all of this has been done- mostly I just want to make sure that whomever did the vandalism will not be able to access the account and make edits under your name. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've put your userpage on my watchlist, so you can reply here and/or ping me by writing . Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

(signing, so the ping will work. Eddymason (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC) )
 * Note: I changed my password. ^_^ Eddymason (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I didn't think accounts could be unblocked once they've been hacked, as there's no way to tell whether it's the genuine owner of the account or the hacker who's talking now and telling us the password has been changed? Squinge (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

CU comment: The account hasn't been hacked, and it appears that this is indeed Badmachine. Talk page revoked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)