User talk:Edelweiss Broking Limited

January 2017
There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Samtar talk · contribs 10:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Edelweiss Broking Limited for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edelweiss Broking Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edelweiss Broking Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Advice on getting started at editing Wikipedia
My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I have contacted the blocking administrator, and suggested unblocking you. Since you already have an account with an acceptable user name at Piyushpanc, would you prefer us to unblock that account, rather than unblocking and renaming this one? That way, most of the edits you have already made would be kept with the account you would use in the future. That is just a suggestion, and it is totally up to you whether you follow it or not. (I see that on the talk page of your other account I wrote "Unless and until your original account is unblocked you must not edit Wikipedia", but although it is usual to unblock only an editor's original account in this situation, I see no reason not to make an exception this time if you would like us to.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I got an answer from the blocking administrator very quickly, and so I shall go ahead and unblock this account. If you would prefer to have the other account unblocked instead, let me know, and I'll do that for you. If you decide to carry on with this account, you should put a request in at Changing username as soon as possible, and certainly before you do any more editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi JamesBWatson, thanks a lot for the same. Since, I had already started using that new id created User:piyushpanc. I would request not to block this account, instead activate User:piyushpanc such that I can continue contributing to wiki.

Thanks & Regards, Edelweiss Broking Limited (talk) 11:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, I have unblocked Piyushpanc. You should stick to using that account from now on. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot JamesBWatson .Sure, will take care of the same.

Edelweiss Broking Limited (talk) 11:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)