User talk:Edenc1/Archive 3

Israeli chart
If there is an official Israeli chart (not the Galgalatz chart, which charts the performance on a single network), please provide sourcing for it. The reason the chart from charts.co.il is on WP:BADCHARTS is not because charts.co.il has a problem, it's because it's a single network chart. That's the same reason we don't permit iTunes and Amazon.&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:08, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It may claim to be official, but it's a self-serving claim. So far as anyone has determined, it only charts the airplay on Galgalatz, which makes it a single-network chart. Can you find any evidence that it includes sales or airplay from multiple outlets?&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You'd be surprised how many "official" charts aren't. What we need is a source that says that it combines sales or airplay from multiple networks or outlets, and is reliable. "Official" doesn't matter at all.&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I was very precise about what was necessary, but I will say it again: there needs to be a source that says the chart includes sales or airplay from multiple outlets. Single network charts are not acceptable, "official" or not.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:BigBrotherIsrael.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BigBrotherIsrael.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Arutz HaYeladim
Hello, I noticed you recently added Israel international broadcast in the article How to be Indie, However I am unable to find the television station in the article Television in Israel, however an google search lead me to an kids channel, is Arutz HaYeladim an major television channel, because if it is, I believe it should be placed in the aforementioned article. Matt-tastic (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. Arutz HaYeladim (The Children Channel) (Official website, About the channel, Hebrew Wikipedia) is the most successful children's channel in Israel, which was launched in 1989. The channel is mentioned in the article, under the section Cables and satellite regulated channels. Edenc1 • Talk 11:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your reply, I am always happy to learn something new about children's television Matt-tastic (talk) 12:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

There will be no removal of the stars from the cast list of the Desperate Housewives page.
Just so we're clear, there will be NO removal of the stars from the cast list of the Desperate Housewives page. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:25, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:OWN. Edenc1 • Talk 16:00, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Matthew Bomer
Hi, can you please help? ViewpointPR, a new editor, uploaded a picture he claims is of Bomer. He's stuck it in the article. It doesn't look like Bomer to me, but he's reverted my reversion, and I'm unwilling to revert him again. I've questioned the picture on Commons, but that may take some time to work out. What are your thoughts?--Bbb23 (talk) 01:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Apparently, the picture is Bomer, but it's not clear that the editor owns the copyright to the picture. See here. Even assuming he does, is that an appropriate picture for the infobox? Also, is the editor trying to promote his own work if he's in the business?--Bbb23 (talk) 01:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't know much about Wikipedia's policies, but I left a comment here (as Superboi). I hope it helps. Edenc1 • Talk 13:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, that will be very helpful.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quick question
Could you please explain why you identified this edit as vandalism? I know the source isn't the best, but the addition of Ms. Russell is sourced and despite the lackluster reference remains (to my knowledge) true. But even if it were false, I'm not sure how you can qualify an otherwise good-faith edit as vandalism. If there's something I'm missing here, please elaborate. Thanks. DKqwerty (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The IP removed Russell from the list without any explanation. The source says she is Jewish, so I don't see any reason to remove her from the list... Edenc1 • Talk 16:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Shit, sorry man. I'm left-handed and as a result mildly dyslexic; I often confuse which side is which on edit diffs. My apologies. Still, an IP's first edit (particularly when blanking is concerned) should be considered good-faith since he or she is certainly not familiar with Wikipedia policies like edit summaries or sourcing. The IP may have just been trying to help, and there's no policy indicating that blanking or deletions should always be considered vandalism. Anyway, sorry for the error on my part, but I still think calling the edit vandalism was a bit excessive. But hey, I've done it too so whatever. DKqwerty (talk) 17:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That's OK :) You're right, I should have assumed good faith. Edenc1 • Talk 17:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Maccabeats
What was the reason for the removal of the Gaby Dunn Maccabeat rating? I know the source is a blog, but on the same note it is a well respected blog with thousands of followers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.98.152.137 (talk) 23:24, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * As WP:BLOGS says: Anyone can create a personal web page. I think you should discuss it on the article's talk page. Edenc1 • Talk 23:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Avi Cohen
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Avi Cohen, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 22:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Can I ask why you kept changing the page Avi Cohen stating that he was alive when there were references stating that he'd died? Your changes, you said in the edit summary were because you said he was still alive butthis reference which I put on the page (number 4 in the reference list) states at the bottom "His son Tamir Cohen – also a footballer who plays for Bolton Wanderers - confirmed his death" states that he has died.  The first sentence of the reference also states that he's died.  So can I ask why the article was changed? --5 albert square (talk) 23:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Because all the Israeli news sites say he's still alive: Walla, NRG, ynet. Edenc1 • Talk 23:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)