User talk:Edetech

Evol Child
A tag has been placed on Evol Child, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Evol Child. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.Drat (Talk) 08:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Evol chid
Thanks for your message. The article you posted was deleted, following nomination by another editor, for being non-notable web content under our criteria for speedy deletion. This was because it did not assert notability, contained no third-party sources and failed to meet our criterion for web content inclusion.

This can be challenged through standard Wikipedia channels, but I'm 100% confident that Wikipedia policy, guidelines, fellow editors, administrators and our founder himself will all be behind me on this one.

By the way, the allegations of corruption you have made against me are very serious, both within Wikipedia and in the real world. Please present your evidence for these serious allegations to the appropriate authorities (you can do so here, here or best of all via the contacts given here) as soon as possible as such abuses of Wikipedia are not tolerated and it is important that I am caught, banned and prosecuted as soon as possible.

Thanks for your time.  RΞDVΞRS ✖  ЯΞVΞЯSΞ  19:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * If you want to get cranky at anyone, get cranky at me. I was the one who tagged your article for speedy deletion. The point remains that you presented no assertions of why the article was notable, and also provided no verifiable evidence of non-trivial coverage by reliable, wholly independent sources. A simple google search for "Evol Child" shows very little to no non-trivial coverage, and practically all in unreliable sources (blogs, forums, etc.). Furthermore, a cursory check of the related pages on machinima.com and youtube shows only about 1000 or so views total. That's nothing special. You should also read the following pages from WikiProject Machinima: The guidelines and the log of machinima-related deletions and AFD debates


 * As for Red vs. Blue, if you take a look at the bottom of that article, you'll see loads of reliable, independent sources, that were used as references to build the article. The people behind RvB do not "spam" on the site.--Drat (Talk) 04:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)