User talk:Edforrest

Welcome!
Hello, Edforrest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=583528369 your edit] to H. H. Scott, Inc. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * you may have never enjoyed. (By the way...not sure if a H.H. Scott by Emerson) would be the same!

ley lines source
Your recent addition to Ley lines contains unsourced statements and personal commentary. Plus the ref you added in the ref section appears to be self promotion and incomplete. Vsmith (talk) 16:38, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I am afraid that I had to delete a further revision you made to Ley lines for a similar reason to Vsmith above. Wikipedia pages are meant to be encyclopedic in nature, with information which can be verified against other sources. Your style of writing might well be suitable for a blog, but does not fit with the way Wikipedia works. Please see What Wikipedia is not for further insight into this. Leutha (talk) 21:06, 16 November 2014 (UTC) ---

I am just catching up on old thoughts. Surely, Ley Lines are "old thoughts" and my effort is not to self-promote but to look at the Ley Lines again in a newer light. The rehash of old thoughts does not seem to advance the study. OK...I do have a thesis and am seeking to discuss it in a new light.

December 2020
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to The Fiber Optic Association. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--Srleffler (talk) 05:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)