User talk:Edgar.bailey111

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zifa Sadriyeva (April 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zifa Sadriyeva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zifa_Sadriyeva Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blaze_Wolf&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zifa_Sadriyeva reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Blaze Wolfe, my article conforms to all other articles about Business Executives, including where they cite press releases from company's own pages. It is, hence, entirely reasonable to be not disappointed, but to question the legitimacy of your decisions, which was what I have done, but was for this immediately blocked - having not done anything illegal whatsoever! I had not published any spam, and had not made any personal attacks! So why have you contributed or directly caused or attracted attention of people who had been commented to have been trolls in other cases and also had been asked by other Wikipedia users to not be unfair in their blocking decisions towards other users? I allege the person who had blocked is involved in illegal activities. I demand dispute resolution, which seemingly is available for other users. And demand to be unblocked, because this is a defamatory and illegal act. Edgar.bailey111 (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zifa Sadriyeva (April 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zifa Sadriyeva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zifa_Sadriyeva Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blaze_Wolf&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zifa_Sadriyeva reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * I have left a message in response on your Talk page apparently, having not seen Reply button here. In addition to what is written there, here is one CEO profile with a reference to a press release on the organisation's own website: Hein Schumacher - Wikipedia, hence, it is not clear why this person, Zifa Sadriyeva, had attracted such odd comments and two requests to re-submit.
 * Yours sincerely,
 * Edgar Edgar.bailey111 (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * See other crap exists for that argument, the fact that there are other poorly sourced articles doesn't mean we want more? Theroadislong (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * What is this conversation? Why are you using such insulting words when writing to me? What are you trying to substantiate? Edgar.bailey111 (talk) 15:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * A user who has been previously called by other users a troll, had seemingly submitted the article for speedy deletion.
 * Could you please help to approve the page as everything had been correct there (if you aren't yourself a troll, of course).
 * Thank you.
 * Yours sincerely,
 * Edgar Edgar.bailey111 (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zifa Sadriyeva


A tag has been placed on Draft:Zifa Sadriyeva, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VViking Talk Edits 14:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Assuming good faith
Please remember to assume good faith your comment on Blaze Wolf's talk page where you stated that the failure to approve the article was "frankly, disturbing, especially this being a businesswoman" seems to be claiming that the reason Blaze did not approve the article was because they are sexist. This does not assume good faith. You later went on to state, not that just other people have called me a troll, but you specifically called me a troll when you said: "and to investigate why a troll is allowed to "speedy delete"" Please remember to talk about the substance of the article and not make personal attacks that people are trolls or sexist. Doing so may lead to a loss of editing privilege's.-- VViking Talk Edits 15:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)


 * As there had been an unsubstantiated decision to "request re-submit", which does not conform to what could be found on pages about other Business executives, it was, indeed, disturbing, especially given that this woman had been under attack of trolls and went through horrendous discrimination.
 * Moreover, please note how onerous you are all acting whereby within seconds, having not even been able to receive anything from Help me to review your totally absurd and unfair "speedy deletion", my account had also been blocked! For what exactly? So you are writing things about me, which does not actually correspond to the reality, to the truth, and then block me for doing nothing wrong, having not committed one illegal act, yet, it is your, sir or madam, who had been branded a troll on Wikipedia for seemingly such similar behaviour towards other people.
 * Immediately apologise to me. There is publicly available information about patents, hence, whoever - another user, who had written about patents something, does not know the topic and should not have chipped in.
 * This is all completely and entirely illegal.
 * Yours sincerely,
 * Edgar Edgar.bailey111 (talk) 15:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You can have only one unblock request at a time. I have almost revoked Talk page access because of your post-block rants and attacks. If you persist, I will.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have revoked TPA because of the legal threat.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)