User talk:Edgar181

Please don't imagine some nefarious purpose in my actions or even anything meaningful. Breaking the rules was simply for my own entertainment. I have a habit of pushing boundaries, often to the point of recklessness, for no other purpose than finding it fun. My participation in Wikipedia has always been because I find it fun - it's a hobby. I took playing with Wikipedia too far - I broke the rules just for self-amusement and got caught. There's really no more to it than that. I'm sorry that I caused this trouble. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I am required to notify you about a community ban discussion about you at the Administrators' noticeboard. However, between my decision to create the discussion and the implementation of my decision, a similar discussion was already created at WP:ANI. I am sorry for the unnecessary duplicate discussion and notification. Feel free to remove this message when you have read it, unless you'd like to keep it here for whatever reason. I don't want to be "gravedancing" here. Again, sorry. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The discussion was eventually held at AN, and the result is that you have been banned by community consensus. Any potential return to editing would need to be predicated on community consensus for your return, as well as committee approval for the lifting of the block. Let me know if you have any questions. –xenotalk 13:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Ed. I'm not sure what to say about the sockpuppetry, but whatever your motivations, you did a lot of good work here&mdash;both as "yourself" and as Deli nk&mdash;so I wanted to thank you for that. I hope you're well, and take care. MastCell Talk 16:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, Ed. I hope you're doing OK. I completely agree with MastCell that you did a lot of good work. Bishonen &#124; talk 16:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC).
 * I concur with MastCell and Bishonen that you did a huge amount of great work, especially in the area of chemistry articles. You will be missed. --Leyo 23:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Ed. I am still puzzled by all this and don't know what to think. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Yah thanks for the work fighting spam over the years. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 00:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Also thanks for all the chemical gnome work with images, disambiguation, set pages and redirects. I will add HAPPY CHRISTMAS ! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * And thanks from me as well for all your chemistry work here and on commons. DMacks (talk) 03:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Somewhat belated but thanks from me as well. I only just stumbled onto the fact that you've been blocked - I don't as yet understand the reasons. Whatever it was, much of what you did here was good and that input will be missed. --Project Osprey (talk) 13:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I also am not in the admin loop. You were very helpful to me and to the chemistry community.  And it looks like you did all kinds of good outside of the Chemistry work.  --Smokefoot (talk) 23:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into your local language via meta

Thanks again :-) --  Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

"E918" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect E918 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

"Parmotrema tinctorum" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Parmotrema tinctorum and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Roostery123 (talk) 11:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

"Magnesium-L-threonate" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Magnesium-L-threonate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 21 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Qwv (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

"Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)_phthalate&redirect=no Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Leyo 13:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

"Α-BCH" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%CE%91-BCH&redirect=no Α-BCH] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

"Β-BCH" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%CE%92-BCH&redirect=no Β-BCH] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdewman6 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Idropranolol for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idropranolol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Idropranolol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Darcyisvery cute (talk) 07:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Helional (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Helional (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2-Pyridone (data page) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2-Pyridone (data page) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2-Pyridone (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. -Lemonaka 16:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)