User talk:Edgar181/Archive10

Another possible copyvio
Hi. I see you have been zapping a set of copyvio biographical articles I tagged. There is one more I was hesitating whether to tag: have a look at Manthia Diawara. About two-thirds of it, from "A native of Mali..." to "...Rouch in Reverse", is lifted sentence by sentence from a longer bio here. The first and last sentences are new. I'm not sure whether that is enough to count as copyvio. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and deleted that article too. It appears this user is unfamiliar with Wikipedia's rules about using copyrighted text.  I have encouraged him to create the articles again using text written in his own words.  Thanks for catching these problems, and if you notice that it persists, please just let me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Erwin Braucheimer
Hi! Have you heard of Erwin Braucheimer or the Braucheimer Release Cap? I have a feeling the two are hoaxes (the image of Erwin Braucheimer is apparently Ivan Turgenev), but wanted an experimentalists opinion before jumping on a newbie. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 21:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * They do appear highly suspicious to me. I have left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry asking other chemists to take a look too. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Both have now been deleted as hoaxes. Thanks for catching the problem and bringing it to the chemists' attention.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

CSD:R3
Apart from being entirely pointless, R3 has another pitfall: GFDL compliance. In the case of Outrageous Fortune/Loretta West, content had been merged to Characters in Outrageous Fortune. A history merge needs to be done to avoid violating the copyright of Outrageous Fortune/Loretta West's author; please be careful about this. Wily D 19:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching it - I didn't see that there was a merge in its history. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. CSD taggers are not very good - it behooves us to examine the candidate closely, given how many bad tags get added. Wily D  20:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I often see bad CSD tags and make a habit of checking the articles' histories, but obviously missed this one. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Boris Graffiti - final cut pro
Hi Edgar, fair point just give me a second I'm working on it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Escapecp (talk • contribs) 19:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Toxiferine I.png
Hey Ed, I think something is missing from the above image... see Image:Toxiferin.svg and CTD. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * D'oh! And yours is missing stereochemistry at two positions in the 8-membered ring.  :P
 * I've deleted my image and inserted yours. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not mine—it's Ayacop's ;) Not much time for structures today, unfortunately. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ...and you shouldn't have deleted yours; either Ayacop's is of another toxiferine (there are several), or it's missing a hydroxyl group! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I can't seem to get anything right, can I? I've corrected my original image (I think!) and added it to the article.  I have left a note for Ayacop about his image too. Thank you for your careful eye - I'm glad at least one person is paying attention. :)  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of 'Marriage Strike' Article
May I ask why you did this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.157.154 (talk) 13:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't delete it. Marriage Strike was deleted by User:MBisanz because of this discussion: Articles for deletion/Marriage Strike.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * It has your name on it. Are you saying someone else is responsible?
 * I will go and read the article you linked for more information, thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.157.154 (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see the confusion now. I deleted Marriage strike (different capitalization) because it was an unneeded redirect to the already deleted Marriage Strike.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh! Okay, thanks for clearing that up for me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.157.154 (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Achyranthes aspera
I didn't see the Achyranthes aspera article before you deleted it, but there is an existing article on the genus Achyranthes which might allow you or someone to add context to the deleted article. -- Eastmain (talk) 17:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There wasn't much there - just an external link: www.hear.org/species/achyranthes_aspera/
 * Feel free to add it to the genus article if you like. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

User 68.198.222.5
Hi Ed,

I don't quite understand why this [IP] has not been blocked for a longer period of time. Most of their edits are either vandalism or quite unconstructive and of poor quality, and they have a history of doing this for quite some time. As you can see, they are at it again. Thanks Halogenated (talk) 13:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the user wants to contribute constructively, despite the poor quality of some of his edits so far, so it's probably best not to block for too long. First blocks are typically short, but if inappropriate behavior continues, longer blocks can be applied.  The block seems to have served to get his attention at biodegradable plastic, and he has made suggestions at the talk page instead of repeating his previous edits to the article.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand, but in consideration of the edits (some recent) made on other pages which can only be defined as vandalism, a history of vandalism, and having been previously been blocked for vandalism, I have a hard time taking him/her too seriously. I see this IP has been temporarily blocked by a different admin though.  I tried asking him/her if they'd like help, they did not respond to either myself or anyone else AFAIK.  I'm not suggesting an indefinite block, but this IP is being rather disruptive and contributing nothing of value.  Cheers Halogenated (talk) 02:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The next time this user is disruptive, I will block for longer. (Sorry, just noticed this reply now; wasn't ignoring you.) -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocking
Dear Edgar181

You've blocked everyone at my school from editing wiki articals and from creating acounts. I'm afraid this has caused a major distruption in the ICT department. If it is possible, please undo your actions.

Regards,

Berother 1

IP adress- 154.32.91.241 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berother1 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Considering the amount of persistent vandalism from that IP address despite prior long-term blocks, the current block is appropriate and well within Wikipedia's standard procedures. The block is "anonymous only", so registered users are still able to edit from that IP address.  There are also instructions on the talk page, User talk:154.32.91.241, that explain how anyone can register for an account even if their school's IP address is blocked.  If this is insufficient, please let me know the details of the problem and maybe we can arrange something else.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

User 74.94.214.73
User_talk:74.94.214.73 is busy vandalizing again. Is there any chance we can block them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pianohacker (talk • contribs) 16:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Every edit since the last block expired is vandalism, so I blocked again. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello
I once again removed the "safety" section from Chlorine. You being an admin, I think it's absolutely ridiculous that you still don't know what, exactly, an encyclopedia is. Please look into it. Thanks. 66.57.44.247 (talk) 03:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No need for the silly insults. Having a brief "Safety" section in chlorine clearly makes it a better encyclopedia article, and is consistent with WikiProject Chemicals/Style guidelines and WikiProject Elements/Guidelines.  If you disagree with the long-standing consensus to include this type of information, please discuss potential changes to the guidelines at the relevent Wikiprojects instead.  Thank you.   -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Dr.
why are U delete my Article Orgenometalic Compound..... i am also positive thinker of WIKI.... plz Help me and don't delete it.... Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Soft (talk • contribs) 11:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The entire contents of the article were "Orgenometalic Compound", so I deleted it as an empty article. If there is something you would like to add to Wikipedia related to organometallic compounds, organometallic chemistry would probably be the best place to do it.   -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Oenanthotoxin
Hi Edgar. I tried to put a chembox on this page but its not working and I can't work out why. Don't suppose you'd mind having a look? Meodipt (talk) 12:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Ok don't worry Fvasconcellos fixed it :-) Meodipt (talk) 12:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The closing  was missing. Couldn't resist fixing it ;) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Fv. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

why do u keep deleting christa campbells page its soo ubsurd
if you would do your homework you would see Slater and Gooding Jr. in Lies & Illusions Source: Variety May 15, 2008

Christian Slater and Cuba Gooding Jr. will star in Nu Image/Millennium Films' action-comedy Lies & Illusions, reports Variety. Shooting begins this week in Spokane, Washington.

The film is directed by Tibor Takacs (Mega Snake) from a script by Eric James. The story centers on a novelist being hunted by a spy who believes the writer holds millions of dollars in diamonds stolen by his dead fiancee.

The film also stars Sarah Ann Schultz, Christa Campbell, Al Madrigal and Lochlyn Munro.

this is just one of many articles about her movies try google —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christacc (talk • contribs) 00:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I have never deleted Christa Campbell. Please see the deletion log for that page.  However, I did delete the talk page, Talk:Christa Campbell, because it was the talk page of an already-deleted article.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Urban Ninja
Please check my references before you delete my page, every thing was true and not nnonsense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcrsweetness (talk • contribs) 22:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I have never deleted Urban Ninja. Please see the deletion log for that page.  If you are referring to a different article, you need to tell me which article you are referring to.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Boromycin image
Hi Ed, I'm trying to validate chembox information, and I found a couple of unresolved stereocenters in your boromycin image (both are in five-membered rings). Looking at White's total synthesis in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 790-192, he has all of these clearly defined. Could you upload a fresh image with the "missing" stereocenters resolved? I think all of the others match with our database. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 06:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, I have updated the image and the SMILES in the article. The IUPAC name still needs to be updated to reflect definition of those two stereocenters - the software that I have says the structure is too complex for it to generate the name.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! I think ChemSpiderMan has some pretty reliable software for the IUPAC names, so I'll ask him for that.  I hope your autumn is going well, all the best, Walkerma (talk) 03:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ChemSpiderman asked me for the MOL File of this (or failing that, a ChemDraw/ChemSketch file or whatever) so we can list it as a correction in our main curated collection. Can you email one to me, walkermaAtpotsdamDOTedu? If that's not possible, reply here. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 17:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I have emailed you .mol and .cdx versions of the file. If you need anything else, just let me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Smelly2k8
User received an inappropriate 4im warning after 2 edits, edited again and was blocked indef. Can you explain how this is appropriate under our blocking policy? لenna vecia  13:46, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Each edit from this user involved vandalism with obscenities. Warning, then blocking was completely appropriate.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * We don't blow our policies out of the water because someone drops the f-bomb in an article. لenna  vecia  14:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The user was blatantly vandalizing, the user was warned about it, then the user was blocked. It's quite routine.  Can you please be more specific about how you think this "blows our policies out of the water"? -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Most users who go through the standard set of warnings are "blatantly vandalizing", thus they are receiving warnings. The 4im warnings are reserved for extreme vandalism, particularly when dealing with BLPs. Skipping our standards for giving a series of warnings in order to brings attention to our policies is not appropriate. Some vandals do stop once they see that people can attach their edits to their account or IP. Others stop when they realize they'll be blocked. Some, dare I say, read the messages, click the links and go on to make constructive edits. This happens more than I would previously have thought, as I use huggle and see edits marked as being from IPs or editors with various levels of warnings, but the edit I review is good. Additionally, we use escalating blocks. Some users reform once they realize that we take it seriously and block for vandalism. Indef for first three edits is extreme. Skipping the standard warning and blocking methods can prove to be counter-productive. We have them for good reason and we should be utilizing them fairly across the board. لenna  vecia  21:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no requirement in our policies for a full series of warnings, and that's why the template uw-vand4im exists in the first place. In cases like this, in my opinion, it is common sense and clearly to the benefit of Wikipedia to block promptly; to do otherwise would be counter-productive.  Blocking in these cases falls well within "our standards". -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 4im wasn't created for cases like this. لenna  vecia  02:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 4im is commonly used in cases like this. -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Even the template we use on AIV explains this.
 * If it's being used for cases like this, it's being used inappropriately. لenna  vecia  17:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As one of the most active admins at AIV, I can say that this template is often given to users who vandalize with obscenities. And I can't recall seeing an admin turn down a following report at AIV.  Perhaps the wording of  should be modified to reflect the way the community uses the 4im template.  This use has been long-standing, too.  Looking back at the original template (template:blatantvandal}, the user who created it specifically mentions obscene vandalism as one of its intended uses (Template talk:Blatantvandal).  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the history. I'm going to ask Goc g the next time I see him if the use of the f-bomb alone is what he meant by "obscene". I don't think it's appropriate to blow over our system of warnings and escalating blocks because a vandal uses an expletive. So I'm going to get some further opinions to see if I'm in the minority or not. Either way, there does need to be some clarification on the template. It's just a matter of determining what that clarification should be. Thanks again, لenna  vecia  18:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, the user's edits contained something I consider worse than just obscenities . In any case, thanks for the discussion (I think it's healthy for admins to have these kinds of discussions - more polite disagreement, less drama.)  If you do start a discussion somewhere pertaining to the appropriate use of 4im and related templates, will you please let me know?  I'd be interested to hear what others think, too.  Thanks.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted, as far as what you found more offensive. I'm still not convinced it deserved a 4im/indef, but I do agree that discussion is good. I'm heading off to work now, but I'll definitely link you when I get discussion going. Thanks, لenna  vecia  20:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted, as far as what you found more offensive. I'm still not convinced it deserved a 4im/indef, but I do agree that discussion is good. I'm heading off to work now, but I'll definitely link you when I get discussion going. Thanks, لenna  vecia  20:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Wal2wal
Hi Ed. I got a message from an IP regarding this blocked user, explaining the reason behind their behaviour with an additional request that they be unblocked now that the situation has been clarified. I happen to agree with this as per WP:AGF. Therefore I would like to request if you don't mind unblocking Wal2wal. Thank you and take care. Tasos (Dr.K. (talk) 01:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC))
 * OK, I have unblocked now. -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Take care Ed. Tasos (Dr.K. (talk) 13:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC))

Lorcaserin
Hi Edgar. There seems to be a bit of an edit war brewing over this compound, you might want to take a look if you have time...Meodipt (talk) 04:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I have left a welcome message and gentle warning on each of the user's talk pages. I'll keep an eye on the article, too.  Thanks for letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks! -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Lorcaserin
There is indeed an editing war going on with the lorcaserin entry. Leftcoaster scab seems eager to remove all less-than-flattering info about lorcaserin and replace it with Arena Pharmaceuticals' press releases. He has on many occasions completely wiped out all of my hard work which I openly admit is imperfect but is getting better. (I'm trying !) I suspect he/she has a financial stake in Arena. I do not. I'm upset that he/she might turn the entry into an advertisement for the drug, which has not yet been FDA approved but if it is it will likely be a massive money-maker. The entry should contain factual info, whether flattering or not. I have supplied numerous references, many of which point to Arena Pharmaceuticals' own material. I opened a discussion on the entry's talk page. I also submitted a talk message to Meodipt, whose presence as a lorcaserin editor I definitely appreciate as he/she has great credentials and appears to be unbiased.Liturgie de cristal (talk) 00:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your efforts. I would generally agree with your assessment and think that you and Meodipt are doing a good job at writing a factual and balanced article.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with your deletion of the Male Actors List
Why did you delete the list of mail actors? I really needed that for a school project. Wikipedia is the only site where there are reliable lists! I always come to this site and this time you let me down. I just want to let you know that I won't be visiting Wikipedia anytime soon!!!
 * If you want to know why I deleted an article, you have to let me know the title of the article you are referring to. There has never been an article titled Male Actors List. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

WHY DID YOU DELETE MY PAGE?
Why did you delete my page user:misfest?

I put this page on wikipedia to go in a category with other pages of a very similar nature. There are 13 other pages of a similar vein so why was mine deleted?

There are many articles on wiki which do not relate to wiki directly. It is a resource for general information.

My page is no different to the other 13 pages in the category I wish to put it in so therefore there was no reason to delete it.

Please explain! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misfest (talk • contribs) 13:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I deleted User:Misfest because promotion of an organization unrelated to Wikipedia is not permitted on user pages, regardless of whether articles about related organizations exist on Wikipedia. If you wish to create an article about your organization, you may do so at Misfest (rather than User:Misfest), provided that you think the organization meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Please be aware that if other editors think the organization does not meet Wikipedia guidelines, it may end up getting being again.  You may also want to take a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines, which seem to apply here.  Hope this helps.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Delete please
Template:AFC completed/doc should probably be deleted as well. Thanks. MSGJ 20:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, done. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Mapisimo
I searched for the Mapisimo web site in wikipedia and I found that it was added by someone and deleted by you. The mapisimo website enjoys popularity particularly in Italy where it was featured in the news - for example, see this article L'Espresso. http://espresso.repubblica.it/dettaglio-local/Internet-Colosseo-in-vendita/1737752/6 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.172.230.99 (talk) 10:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I deleted Mapisimo last July because it was a very short article that did not indicate any notability about the website, thereby meeting speedy deletion criteria A7. If you wish to create a more thorough article, and you think it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, please feel free to do so.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocking
Hi, Could you please give me a valid reason why you blocked my IP: 195.158.110.241 for the article on Betonmarkets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Regentmarkets (talk • contribs) 16:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * According to the block log, that IP address has never been blocked by anyone, including me. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi again, I am trying to use the page again:

Please find below the message received:

20:53, 13 October 2008 Edgar181 (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Betonmarkets" ‎ (G11, WP:USER: promotion of a business or organization unrelated to Wikipedia)

Can you please unblock me because I am the official owner of the information to be provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.158.110.241 (talk) 19:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia does not permit advertising on user pages and this is why I deleted User:Betonmarkets (see WP:USER). Wikipedia also does not permit promotional usernames that match the name of an organization being promoted (see WP:USERNAME).  This is why I blocked the username Betonmarkets.  Wikipedia also has guidelines pertaining to conflicts of interest (see WP:COI), which seems apply here. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Bicalutamide
Hi Edgar. Is there an NPOV or undue weight tag or something that can go on this article? My knowledge of andrology is not that detailed and so far as I can tell from the literature the side effects so luridly described here are accurate, but the article at present is way too one-sided and reads like a tirade against androgen receptor antagonists, with little mention of their beneficial uses in treatment of BPH, prostate cancer etc. It really needs attention from someone more skilled in this area to rewrite it in a more balanced fashion. Meodipt (talk) 21:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with you that the article seems to focus too much on the negative effects of blocking androgen receptors, rather than on the specific effects (including benefits) of the drug itself. I have added a POV-sect tag to the one section of the article.  That section was added entirely by one individual and has not been edited since, so it's safe to say that it represents the point of view of one individual.  The article could certainly use additional references, too.  I don't have much experience in this area, but I'll see if I can find some literature that might help balance the article.  You might also want to drop a note at the Pharmacology or Medicine Wikiprojects to see if anyone else might want to help out.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete?
Hi Edgar.

I would like you to provide me with specific examples as to why you deleted my post for "Arkiva" twice. I re-wrote it the second time, but it was quickly deleted again.

I have re-written most of it a third time, now, and would like to post it. However, it is protected and I cannot do this.

Please let me know what I can do to ensure that this will not be deleted.

The link to the entry is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkiva

Thank you.

- Cori


 * I have never deleted Arkiva. According to the deletion log, it was deleted once by User:RHaworth and once by User:TexasAndroid.  They both gave "blatant advertising" as the reason for deletion.  You can contact either of them if you have questions about the deletion.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Why delete?
i had a page up called imaplestory. It was deleted a while ago. I know you thought there wasn't enough info, but i was planning on adding more later. Please tell me exactly why it was deleted instead of added to Kittycat0143 (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I have never deleted Imaplestory. According to the deletion log, it was deleted once by User:Acroterion and once by User:NawlinWiki.  You can contact either of them if you have questions about the reasons for deletion of this article.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Help with chemical formula
I created a structure SVG for Remogliflozin etabonate but I can't make the hetero atoms scale. As far as I can tell, I've done nothing different from my other structures (Image:Semagacestat structure.svg, for example). Could you find out what's wrong? Thanks --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I don't really know much at all about the SVG image format, so I don't think I can help you. Perhaps someone at Graphic Lab can help out?  Or you can ask User:Fvasconcellos who creates many chemical structure images in SVG format.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see Fv already contacted you. Nothing gets past him. :) -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've already told him that :-) --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 20:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Jenny Agutter
Thanks for that. A consensus had actually been reached on the talk page (see this discussion), but one editor seems unhappy about the idea of the section being removed. I don't know whether you've seen it, but if not you might like to check out this checkuser request. I think tonight's activity is probably the work of the same sockmaster. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 23:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing me to the checkuser request. Looks like this is quite the ongoing problem.  Let me know if it continues and I'll try to help out again.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Recent Block
Hi Ed, You recently blocked Cheesemonkey, can you look at user User talk:Diabologuy whose editing history appears to indicate a sock puppet. I think this is a cut and dried case and as the process for reporting can take a while, thought I would bring it straight to you. -- Deadly&forall;ssassin 13:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. Diabologuy is now blocked too.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ta muchly. -- Deadly&forall;ssassin 13:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Theatreography
You have removed a speedy deletion as nonsense tag from Theatreography claiming that the word is used throughout wikipedia. This is incorrect. There were a handful of articles that used it, which I have already corrected. The word does not exist and doesn't appear in the Oxford English Dictionary. As such, it should not appear in Wikipedia, which is a reference work striving for reliability. DionysosProteus (talk) 13:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I did a search and it turned up 20 articles using the word, but I see you have removed them all (which is perfectly fine with me). I don't think deleting a redirect just because it doesn't appear in OED is a good idea and it's certainly not a speedy deletion criteria.  Please feel free to list it at Redirects for discussion.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Impersonator
FYI, I just saw a new user registering in the recent changes section: User:Edgar181isadog. The user name is probably blockable. -Phoenixrod (talk) 06:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Those kinds of usernames pop up occasionally - I find them very entertaining. This one is my favorite.  Thanks, Phoenixrod, for catching this one and thanks, Fv, for blocking him.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Halomethanes template
Hi. I did a draft of the halomethanes template. What do you think about it? If it's good I'll create it and place it on respective pages. --Tomaxer (talk) 14:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the template is a good idea. I suggest a footnote to indicate that the asterisk denotes chirality (HIVpharm is an example of a template with footnotes).  Also, I'm not sure if the first line, "related groups", is necessary though, or maybe it can be moved to the bottom to de-emphasize it, since these items are not the direct subject of the template.  Or perhaps the links could be put in the left column - "Trisubstituted" linking to "trihalomethane", for example.  I like navigation templates such as these, and would be happy to see this template on the all the halomethane pages.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * So I did some changes - I removed the related groups section (it is probably better not to include it) and added that chirality footnote (also moved chirality mark immediately after the C atom). If you think it is all OK, I can create it and add it to the halomethane articles. --Tomaxer (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. Thanks for creating it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Physostigmine structure formula
Can you take a look at the structure svg. I think it is vandalized by changing the svg. All Cs and Ns are suddenly huge. 70.137.138.233 (talk) 10:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think it is vandalism, but rather some kind of bug in the way Wikipedia displays SVGs. In any case, I have created a PNG and replaced it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey Man, This has already been clear up TWICE
Hello Edgar181,

This is your neighborhood, friendly buzzboygt. I respect that you are trying to keep the junk off of Wikipedia, but the article, Clayton McClure, is not junk. It has been disputed several times that this article did not belong in the wikiverse, but it has been proven, undeniably that Clayton McClure has made a great impact on history.

Can you please place this article back.

Thank-you,

buzzboygt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzboygt (talk • contribs) 23:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted by User:Tone because of the discussion at Articles for deletion/Clayton McClure. If you would like to discuss his decision, it would be best to contact him instead.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks on Acepentalene
Thanks for adding the diagram and information box on acepentalene. I wanted to do it but couldn't figure out how to copy my diagram of the molecule into Wikipedia, and I didn't have in my possession any of the other information.

If there's anything I can do to help with chemistry articles, let me know. I am a graduate student at a major university, so I have access to journal articles and all kinds of fun stuff (not to mention other people I can talk to...). Crystal whacker (talk) 22:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for creating the article. If you need help with uploading images, or with anything else, please just let me know and I'd be happy to help out.  If there are things you're looking to do, there is certainly no shortage of work to be done - anything in Category:Chemistry stubs could be expanded, for example.  There is also an organized effort to improve Wikipedia's chemistry articles at WikiProject chemistry and WikiProject chemicals, if you haven't seen them already.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's great. Crystal whacker (talk) 23:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Chemicals
Hi Ed. Can you please remove one of the two full stops at the end? Thanks. --Leyo 17:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ --Rifleman 82 (talk) 17:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Rifleman. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * IMHO it's a pitty that so many templates here are fully protected, so that they can be edited only by administrators. --Leyo 22:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is a pity; but due to the extent of the organized vandalism done to widely used templates, it is becoming more common. The best solution would be to make many, many more users administrators; but unfortunately, I don't see the burdensome RFA process getting easier any time soon.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Kespa
Hello, I don't understand how you could delete KeSPA. This organization is one of the most influential bodies in the e-Sports world, specifically on the Starcraft scene. I don't know how to view the article now but I am sure someone must have mentioned it? Without KeSPA, South Korea would not have 2 TV channels sending live e-Sport games 24/7, there would be no sponsored teams etc. Please put it back... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rollebolle (talk • contribs) 17:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The article I deleted back in September did not contain any content that indicated its notability. If you think the organization meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, and you are willing to write a more comprehensive article, you are free to do so.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Ethyl gallate
I would have guessed that the formula was Ga(OEt)3. ;-) --Itub (talk) 07:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh. Gallate is a rare disambig page where organic and inorganic chemistry live together.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Organofluorine chemistry, Fluorocarbon, etc
It would be helpful if you advised on this area. Itub has his hands really full, and I am barely available this week. My message to user:Beetstra indicates my views. The problem is solvable but requires community attention.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have been following the discussions related to these articles and I have left a couple of talk page comments. But yes, you're right, I haven't become actively involved.  I will try to help out more in terms of resolving the content issues.  I have also left a message on Shootbamboo's talk page expressing my opionion about his editing.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Answer
User pages are not supposed to be used for testing, the page DOESN'T belong to them.--Megaman en m (talk) 23:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Testing is perfectly acceptable on user pages. -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, I've searched for rules on user page, and found out that testing is allowed. Someone else told me it wasn't.--Megaman en m (talk) 23:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, glad it's cleared up. Also, thanks for all the speedy deletion tagging and vandalism-reverting you do.  Cheers, -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:39, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

block based on a mild username
Was the immediate username block of User:Ohshitohno, based on nothing but the name, really necessary? Wikipedia is not censored, and the mere presence of the phrase "oh shit" is not so disruptive that it requires a block.

I can somewhat understand the temptation to IAR and block such a name in the hope that you were blocking a disruptive user behind it, but each time IAR is invoked for a username block it brings UAA more out of step with the username policy.  r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  15:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This has nothing to do with censorship. That suggestion is just plain silly.  And where you think I have invoked WP:IAR just puzzles me (are you confusing me with someone else?).  This has to do with guidelines at WP:IU.  Those guidelines are subjective and you've got to realize that different admins are going to interpret words such as "obviously inappropriate" and "make harmonious editing difficult" slightly differently than you do.  Usernames like these get blocked everyday.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandal Back in Action
I leave it you, but I saw you had blocked this IP user earlier. Might be a good time to do so again. Thanks.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 20:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Warning them was the right thing to do. If he persists, I'll block.  Thanks for letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Magnolia Student Video Festival
Hi I am a new user and tried to put an article of video festival, but it was deleted several times. The festival for sollege and high school students in the USA and outside countries.

So please let me know what the problem is and how I can fix it. You can fine some articles below. Thank you.

http://news.southernarkansasuniversity.info/academics/lpa/2008/04/first-magnolia-student-film-festival-to-be-held-at-sau/550/

http://www.sautmc.com/Site/Theatre_and_Mass_Communication.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugontherock (talk • contribs) 20:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The article Magnolia Student Video Festival and your user page were deleted multiple times as either blantant advertising (see WP:CSD) or as an article that does not indicate why its subject is important (see WP:CSD). User pages should not be used for promotional purposes (see WP:USER) and Wikipedia articles must meet notability criteria outlined at Notability.  I think it is clear that Wikipedia simply isn't a suitable place for an article about the Magnolia Student Video Festival.  There are other websites that you can turn to if you wish to write about it or promote it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

My vandalism report
Thanks for the quick action. I had a question: as noted in my vandalism report, the account Josiah117 was recently created by User:Mr ownage117 see here. The talk page of Mr ownage117 indicates that the account was indefinitely blocked and it too had created the speedily deleted article Josiah Nelson. I wonder how the former account, which was banned on the 10th created the new account today? Should I report this somewhere, or what do you reckon? Nja247 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * When an admin blocks someone, they have a choice of whether to prevent further account creation or not. In this case, User:Gwen Gale permitted account creation when she blocked Mr ownage117.   When someone is blocked for having an inappropriate username, they are generally allowed to sign up with another (unless the name is particularly egregious).  -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification on the process. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Chloroethylnorapomorphine
Hey no worries, its easy to miss a detail when you're just going through someone else's stubs quickly and adding stuff to them - I just saw the structural similarity to propylnorapomorphine and was like, hmm thats got to be a dopamine receptor ligand rather than an opioid! Meodipt (talk) 22:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Airing it all out
Ed, I wanted to write this as a gesture of respect and good-will to find some sort of resolution to the consequences of my edits with you. I am sure I came off as disrespectful with the boldness of my editing on the fluorocarbon talk page and elsewhere. I am sorry that my efforts to calm the situation only made things worse until they got better. Unfortunately for some it is not in my nature to not be bold. I am looking forward to the day when I can practice boldness without upsetting others and when it is most pragmatic. So please don't interpret my contintued "boldness" as an affront to the advice you gave me. (I am concerned it may). To show a bit of positivity with my boldness, take a look here under "To discuss or to BRD." Sorry this was so messy. Thank you for your patience. I'm sure I aggravated the hell out of you. I was quite a frustrated editor. And I must say, I was quite frustrated by your contributions to the page, that suggested pharmaceuticals and fluorocarbons were too closely related to justify splitting off. Then you came in again only to chirp up against my productivity. I felt like some sort of established Wikipedia editing class was simply trying to frustrate my efforts, without listening to the logic I provided. And after taking a look at all the chatter about me, instead of to me on the Wikipedia Chem talk page, I can half-way understand why this might have happened. However, I felt it was my duty to assail against any bureauocratic illogical efforts. I hope I haven't provided enough bold energy to sublime or evaporate your good-will towards me. I am afraid I might have though. My instincts tell me our personalities clash, oddly enough. Admittedly, I wanted to err on the side of being too bold starting out. I just wanted to express that I am not ignornant of the consequences to this approach. I never thought it would get this messy. I figured it would be best to air it all of this out to you. I hope you can view me in a more positive manner. Thanks. -Shootbamboo (talk) 05:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I very much appreciate your comments. The comment I left on your talk page was well-meaning, and was intended to try to diffuse tensions a bit.  But since your response was to think that you must have "aggravated the hell out of me", which is not true at all, then I think my comment must have come across wrong in some way.  And I'd like to emphasize that I never doubted your good intentions toward improving Wikipedia's chemistry articles.  I'm sorry if I implied otherwise in any way.  I think there is plenty of common ground that can be found with discussion and careful editing. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * And thanks for your comments I appreciate them very much also. I'm glad I didn't aggravate. I was putting your edit together with another editor's comments, so that could have easily led to misperceptions on my part. Thanks again. -Shootbamboo (talk) 01:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Betty Baba
I noticed that you deleted the Betty Baba article. Thanks. I'm curious: since the discussion on AFD was closed, why is it still unlocked? Wouldn't it be a better policy to lock pages instead of simply asking people not to edit them further? Thanks. --Cbdorsett (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If I recall correctly, the person who created the article several times said they wouldn't do it again. Protecting the article from being created again can be done if necessary, but just didn't seem worth the trouble at the time.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the Deletion of my unused page Appriciate it [ Rhodes416  ] [ Talk ] 16:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Wiki-Saboteur
Thanks for blocking this account. I was watching him to see if he would continue his first few edits after I reverted them, but I think his user name belied his intentions. - Ahunt (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. He made his intentions clear and a quick block ensued.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

deleting user
In doing website work for aris software I noticed that all of it's 4 major competitors had wikipedia pages amdocs, convergys, Portal software and Intec. All created by employees of there respective companies. I therefore do not see any reason for the deletion of my account for attempting to create such a page. especially considering I had not even published the information but was using the scratch pad as per wiki instructions to test out copy and pasted info to see aritcle structure —Preceding unsigned comment added by Circuitsports (talk • contribs) 22:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I didn't delete your account, just the user page. That page is really supposed to be about you, rather than containing an encyclopedia article.  But that's not really a bit deal.  I have restored the content that was there to User:Circuitsports/Aris where you can work on it.  As it stands, it really comes across as advertising, rather than being written from a neutral point of view.  That's why I thought you were simply trying to advertise.  I would strongly recommend toning it down a bit before creating an article with it.   Hope this helps.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 01:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

error in the structure of tentoxin
respected Edgar181,

I found a mistake in the structure of tentoxin.instead of leucine,there is alanine in the structure.so,please edit the structure as early as possible.(ref. for correct structure tet.lett. 15, 46, 4037).

with regards NAGAPRADEEP —Preceding unsigned comment added by NAGAPRADEEP (talk • contribs) 12:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I'll take a look.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * All fixed now. Thanks again for catching the error.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Goostyyy
User Goostyyy has vandalised again. Maybe you can block him or explain to me how to go about it. Same goes for users Mataboom and Ninja43. JMK (talk) 12:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Normally giving a user who is vandalizing several warnings before blocking is the standard process, but since these three users are all either the same person or several people working together, I have gone ahead and blocked them all. To block a user, you must be an administator, but anyone can report vandals at Administrator intervention against vandalism (if they persist after several warnings) and an admin will quickly take care of it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Waitaminute...
Howdy,

Why'd you delete Caliban (character)? You referenced G8, but that seems to be more about dangling Talk pages or dead-end redirects. Wrong button? --Xover (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It was, in fact, a dead-end redirect. But it looks like someone took a good redirect and made it a redirect to a non-existent page, so I have restored the page and reverted to the original redirect.  Thanks for catching the problem and letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the speedy fix. --Xover (talk) 14:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing my attic
Thanks for removing my old draft reviews! --Philcha (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

TV3 Medford
Hello Edgar,

TV3 Medford is currently going through an "evaluation hearing", a very unique situation where the "Issuing Authority" (Mayor Michael J. McGlynn of Medford) has a retired judge scrutinizing how the monies are being spent.

The current webmaster of the corporation being investigated appears to be vandalizing the TV3 Medford site on Wikipedia and removing the pertinent information which is of historical importance.

As a "Performance Evaluation" is a serious event in access television, it is noteworthy. These type of things rarely happen. It is not a judgment on whether the non-profit currently holding the license survives or not, it is of great public interest, especially as Access TV in America faces new challenges from the cable providers. This is the other side of the coin, that the ratepayers and citizens are actually getting some oversight on how their station is being run.

I notice ZappTV put 3 edits in a 24 hour period: (Reverted 1 edit by Tv3medford identified as vandalism to last revision by Zapptv. using TW) (undo)

The postings on November 19-November 25 including ISP 66.30.0.170 all seem to be from the webmaster either using his home ISP or the one at the station.

It isn't fair that the private non-profit vandalize the site when the information on the evaluation serves the public interest.

your input on this discussion page is appreciated.

Thanks, and Happy Thanksgiving.

Petition (talk) 06:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)petitionPetition (talk) 06:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * If you think there are problems with the article, you are free to make changes to it. I don't know much at all about this topic, and I don't see any need for administrative action at this point.  I notice that there has been no discussion at all on the article's talk page.  You can make your preferred changes to the article, explain about your edits and comment about other people's edits on the article's talk page, and invite the other editors to comment there as well.  If this doesn't lead to results that you are happy with, probably the best thing to do would be to seek help from Wikipedia's dispute resolution (see WP:Dispute resolution).  I hope this helps.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Tetrafluoroethane
Can you take a look here? It looks wrong. Not sure what to do with it. -Shootbamboo (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The page looks fine to me. Sometimes different browser/monitor/computer combinations can lead to different issues.  Can you be more specific about the problem you see?    -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It used to be a "disambiguation" page with only two links, one of which was a red link. I turned it into a redirect, which is what it was until an anonymous user modified it. If one day we have article on the other isomer, we could consider turning it into a dab again. --Itub (talk) 15:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Itub, that seems reasonable to me. Shootbamaboo, is this what you were referring to?  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:54, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * exactly, thanks Itub. -Shootbamboo (talk) 23:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Disodium methyl arsenate
Thanks for the article! I put it into the arsenic page. I was not aware that the people in the US like to life in houses made of arsenic chromium and copper, but wood preservation is one thing, but to put onto plants is another. I do not like the arsenic ...bicides, I had to smell AsH3 once and that was enough.--Stone (talk) 23:41, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, aresenic compounds have a long history of use, but fortunately not so much today. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The Elements of Murder by John Emsley from page 93 on! I liked it!--Stone (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like an interesting book. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Removal of Carlton Leach page
You removed the page about Carlton Leach and you stated he was not a real person. Maybe you should read up? He is a former gangster from England. The movie Rise of the Footsoldier was based on his life.
 * I did not claim anywhere that Carlton Leach was not a real person. I deleted the article because it did not contain any content that indicated the subject's importance.  If you feel that Carlton Leach meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria (see WP:BIO) and you are willing to write a more thorough article, please feel free to do so.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Structure of Uvinul A Plus
Dear Edgar, The structure you add for Uvinul A Plus has a small error. The strucure you draw is for Hexyl 2-[3-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzoyl]benzoate but the substance is Hexyl 2-[4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzoyl]benzoate. The diethylamino group should be on the carbon 4, not 3.
 * The structure I drew matched the one at the PubChem link, but checking with Chemical Abstracts, it seems that structure is wrong. I have now corrected my image.  Thanks for catching the error and letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

The IP address you just blocked
Hi! A bit of an edit conflict occurred when you blocked User:89.167.221.3. I was just about to make the comment against the report on AIV "There appears to be an issue with blocking this IP address, as it blocks more than just the company. See User talk:89.167.221.3" when I found that you had already blocked it. It looks like it was blocked once this morning, then released a short while later. I thought I ought to fore-warn you, as someone may ask for it to be unblocked shortly. I agree that the edits are persistant vandalism, and as such the user should be blocked. However, as it affects so many people, a shorter block may be called for, or some other action. I'm no expert in IP addresses, socks, meats or anything like that, so I can't really suggest what should be done. But I thought I should at least give you the chance to do further investigation/prepare a justification for blocking/leave the country to avoid the screaming mob (delete as applicable *grin*). Cheers! StephenBuxton (talk) 12:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * You just beat me to it with your message. The problem does need resolving quickly (and there are two discussions about the issues on WP:AN at the moment.) I've been formally warning at repeated level 4 since my block was removed (reasonably given the problem, I think) to enable the case for a quick resolution to be given as much weight as possible.  DDStretch    (talk)  12:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notice, both of you. I have unblocked for now. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Propagermanium
Hi Ed, I'm pretty sure this compound is a polymer—see e.g and PMID 11440636. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like you're right. Both Pubchem and Chemical Abstracts have the non-polymeric structure, though.  Thanks.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:41, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Poison12346
Hello, person, as I clearly stated, I am Poison12346 and I wanted to get my account name out there. Why is there a Wikipedia of smosh and Fred but I can't put my account up here? If you want some sort of proof that it's really me, just ask for some and I'll provide it. I just don't think you should have the right to delete an article without any proof of why it shouldn't be up there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HarryPotter013 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has notability criteria for inclusion which you can read here: Notability. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Hollywoodnorth spam report
Hi, if you have doubts about my report, please let me know what the concern is. My report is not a personal issue, this is a clear abuser. His retaliation for my reports is rather personal though, but that is to be expected. Spamicide (talk) 13:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't consider what either of you are doing as vandalism, so I don't think it was appropriate for you to list each other at WP:AIV. At first glance, there does appear to be self-promotion with Hollywoodnorthreport, so your report at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam is the way to go.  If you think additional involvement of administrators is necessary, you can make a note at the administrator's noticeboard:  WP:AN.  AIV is really just for blatant vandalism that requires immediate blocking, not for more complicated issues.  I hope this helps.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. I thought after all his warnings, both by me and other users months ago, and diffs like this:

          

That it would be considered blatant. Anyway, he started kicking and screaming and is following me all over talk pages, so my concern was that the report was dismissed prematurely because of that. Now that I know you did consider the report, I will bring it to WP:AN. Thanks :) Spamicide (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * this user is going out of there way to prove a point to me. I don't know what it is as I have not done anything wrong and have tried to talk with them. They even admitted that this is a SECONDARY wiki account that they use. Is that ok to do? why not show yourself and your clear agenda.....Hollywoodnorthreport (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC).
 * Using multiple accounts is not completely forbidden, as noted at WP:SOCK. As I note above, at first glace it does appear that there are some conflict-of-interest issues with your editing, which is clearly what Spamicide is taking issue with.  I would recommend to both of you seeking dispute resolution:  Dispute resolution.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * if I was a spammer I would be long gone. I'm a user just like you and Ed. Yes lets try to mediate this by ourselves or via dispute resolution....I posted a response to your comments on my talk page. Cheers Hollywoodnorthreport (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC).

Modifying the block of in IP address
For your information, it is now possible to change a block of a user/IP address, without unblocking first. The way to do it is: For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the block user page for the user/IP address.
 * 2) Set the new settings.
 * 3) Check the "Re-block the user with these settings" box.
 * 4) Click on the block button.

Benh34 on AIV
Would you mind taking a look at this listing, as it has been up on AIV for almost an hour. Thanks..> NeutralHomer •  Talk  • December 10, 2008 @ 23:31
 * I was just looking at it. :)  I have blocked the user.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Many thanks! Appericate it :) -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • December 10, 2008 @ 23:33

Thanks
...for this ;) EyeSerene talk 14:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I should have looked a little closer before blocking. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

i would like to know abt azadirachtin present in neem
i would like to know about the chemistry of azadirachtin and what functional group present in it is responsilbe for the anibacterial activity of neem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.85.255 (talk) 15:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It is unlikely that there is anyone one functional group responsible for the biological activity. Instead, the pharmacophore is likely to include large portions of the molecule, but I don't know the details.  You might find useful information in this paper.  The authors of that paper state that the "furan ring in the side chain and a carbonyl α,β-unsaturated (or spiro-epoxide) group appear to be indispensable" for the antifeedant activity.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

thank you sir. it was useful
im currently doing my high school project on antibacterial activity of neem. i kindly thank you. and can i use the above information in my project ? do u mind? and im also including the source and your name in it..so can i use it? it is not for any commercial use... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.74.223 (talk) 15:47, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Feel free to use the info however you choose. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, Edgar
Hello Edgar, Thanks for being alert to the vandalism that has occurred on pages of Wikipedia. I won't put the person's name unless you request it but YouTube has already taken down a theft of copyright by that individual whose name begins with the letter Z. I just reverted a page back to an edit you did because Mr. Z. put personal attack links on the page. Thanks again for your efforts. Petition (talk) 17:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Petition
 * I have blocked the latest account that was vandalizing that article. I also removed some of the abusive edits from the history and semi-protected the page.  Hopefully, this will put an end to it for awhile.  If it does continue, please just let me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Name generation
ChemBioDraw v11 is used for name generation. If you suggest I should rather stop doing this, just say so.

Best regards Peter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.121.106.220 (talk) 14:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't mean to suggest that you stop. (I'm sorry if my message implied that.)  Different ways of automatically generating IUPAC names give different results, and I really don't know if one way is better than any other.  I was hoping you might know, that's all.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

deletion of Neil Carrick
Why did you delete Neil Carrick article? The article had merit and he is a notable person, myself and others have written about him in newspapers, articles and books.

I figure anybody who help bring down an abusive group who was raising 10 million a year deserves at least a lousy article on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tryster (talk • contribs) 20:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I didn't delete the article. I deleted Neil Carrick which was simply a useless redirect to an already deleted article titled Neil Patrick Carrick.  That article was deleted by User:Stifle as a result of this discussion:  Articles for deletion/Neil Patrick Carrick.  If you disagree with that decision, you should contact Stifle and/or read Deletion review.  Hope this helps.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

deletion of Avi Schonfeld
Why did you delete the article about Avi Schönfeld? Avi Schönfeld is a notable person in the field of classical music; he is considered an important contemporary composer indeed! The article had merit and cited sufficient sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurencius (talk • contribs) 06:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It was essentially an empty article. The entire contents of the article I deleted, Avi Schonfeld, was "See: Avi Schönfeld".    If you want to know why Avi Schönfeld was deleted, you can contact the administrator who deleted it, User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Gatekeeper Systems
I am curious to know why the page regarding the company Gatekeeper was deleted? There are credible pages about Best Buy, Albertsons and other companies, how is this any different if it is written in an unbiased and informative format? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilyjauc (talk • contribs) 22:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * According to Wikipedia's policy, promotion of a business or organization unrelated to Wikipedia is not permitted on user pages. That's why I deleted the user page User:Gatekeepersystems. If you wish to create an encyclopedia article (which should be titled Gatekeeper Systems rather than "User:Gatekeeper Systems") please read Wikipedia's guidelines for notability first, to see if it qualifies, or the article may end up being deleted again anyway.  Also, you should probably have a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines as well, which seem to apply here. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

And now, for Fvasconcellos' traditional nonsectarian holiday greeting!

 * Thank you very much. I wish you happy holidays as well.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Season's greetings
This looks a bit like Fv's greetings above. I'll try to create something more unique till next year ;-)
 * Thank you. And happy holidays to you too. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Lysidine (nucleoside)
Hi. Please don't move a page by cutting and pasting its content. Doing so destroys the page edit history and causes copyright infringement (GFDL violations). GFDL requires acknowledgement of all contributors; so it is required that edit histories be preserved for all edits to an article. For this article, I have done a history merge, so there is no longer any trouble now. :) Anyway, please be more careful and use the "move" button next time. :) (More information available at Help:Moving a page!) Best, --PeaceNT (talk) 16:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I took some content from one article, corrected it, and "merged" it with new content while indicating the original source. So GFDL requirements were met.  But the history merge that you did was probably a better way of doing it, so thanks for doing it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

RepulsiveFilms
Dear Edgar181, I believe that deleting the RepulsiveFilms page was completely and wholly unnecessary, and that it portrays my company in an un-biased manner. RepulsiveFilms may not be well known, but we are nonetheless entitled to a page on Wikipedia. We have a fan-base of over a hundred, and plan to expand our company in the coming year. I would be very greatful if you would consider returning the page. Yours with faith, Mr Oliver Wilson, Co-Founder of RepulsiveIndustries 89.240.195.142 (talk) 12:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The article clearly met criteria A7 for deletion. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:52, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Happy holidays to you too.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)