User talk:Edgar181/Archive24

Eritoran
Hi Ed! The reference you added to the lead of Eritoran seems to be invalid (#4, see refs section). Could you please fix it? Thanks, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Too new for the DOI to be active yet, I guess. I have filled in the details manually.  Thanks for catching it.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Move a page please
Could you please move acyl chloride to acyl halide? It seems like acyl chlorides are more important than all the others and no reason is given why. As an IP editor once wrote:"I know, right? The article claims this specific class of compound to be more important than any other, then doesn't bother to explain why. I think the distinction is silly. " 2602:304:CE23:C319:F8EB:899B:C5C1:3F53 (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The article currently titled "acyl chloride" cannot be moved to the title "acyl halide" because there is already a separate article using that title. Merging the content of the two articles is reasonable, but not really necessary, in my opinion.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Taxadiene
Hey thanks for your work on Taxadiene. How did you get a chem diagram for that one? Also I need some help if you are able. I tried to start some other pages (on my profile page) but some user deleted them all. Seems unjustified, as they all had pubchem and chemspider pages linked. If you could help me generate images for these pages, or revert their deletions, or help somehow, it would be awesome. ThanksJatlas (talk) 21:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Not deleted, userfied - check Special:Contributions/Jatlas. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Jatlas. Welcome to Wikipedia.  I was happy to help out with taxadiene and I can understand your frustration.  Wikipedia's way of doing things and its rules can be quite hard to figure out for newcomers.  The pages you created were problematic because they contained so little content.  As an encyclopedia, all the articles in Wikipedia need to have a bare minimum of information.  Several of the articles you created fell below that minimum because they contained no text at all - and without any content, a reader only sees a box with some numbers in it and it's not meaningful.  That's why a couple of the articles were deleted (see WP:CSD for details about the deletion criteria).  The other articles were moved to a different location - into your "user space" from "article space" as RHaworth noted above (see User pages for details).  You can work on the article where they are now, and then move them back to the regular titles when they are ready.  Specifically, they should contain a minimum amount of information so that any reader could at least determine what the article is about.  Articles, including those about chemical compounds, must also meet the general notability criteria to be included.  So you should include some information that indicates why they are notable chemical compounds.  Basing the information on cited references is helpful too.  I'd be glad to help out in any way, including answering any other questions you have.  You may also find others willing to help out at WikiProject Chemistry and WikiProject Chemicals where Wikipedia's chemists discuss issues related to chemistry articles.  I hope this helps, -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Ok thanks for checking back with me guys. I figured all the "stubs" were going to expand eventually. For the majority of these compounds I can get their pubchem/spiderchem IDs and write a few sentences based on scientific papers. I figured notability wouldn't be a problem since the compounds are related by origin, and chemically related to docetaxel, 10-deacetylbaccatin, paclitaxel, baccatin III. Would a few sentences be enough to legitimize the pages? I also would like to generate images for the compounds but do not know how (although I was successful in creating one for baccatin III). ~ thanks again ~ Jatlas (talk) 14:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think a few sentences would be enough provided the compounds are notable in some way (such as some scientific study beyond the mere isolation and identification). For images, there are instructions at Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing.  But if you just leave the structure out of the chembox template, someone will almost certainly create an image and fill it in fairly quickly.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Sean W.
Who has requested deletion? What was the argument? Has it been discussed? --Avoided (talk) 13:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are asking. What is the exact title of the article you are referring to?  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Sean Wrona. --Avoided (talk) 14:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That article was started by User:Smtchahal in March and then he requested deletion by adding the db-g7 template a few days ago. Since Smtchahal was the only significant contributor to the article, it met criteria for speedy deletion, and I deleted it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thank you. I'm glad to help out.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Housekeeping?
I'm not sure how [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Eastern-Europe-map2.svg&oldid=332969594 this] qualified as non-controversial cleanup, considering it hadjust been mentioned on ANI. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As an image talk page containing only an off-topic comment with no content specifically related to the image, it was a typical G6 deletion. At the time I deleted it, the page hadn't yet been mentioned at ANI (timestamps show that the ANI comment and my deletion occurred within one minute).  If anyone thinks there's value in undeleting the comment, I can do so.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Rev Del request on my User Page
There's an offensive edit summary on my User Page that I'm really sick of looking at. Would you mind getting rid of it? Mdw0 (talk) 08:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. It's hidden now.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Lagon Bleu
Good Morning Edgar181, Please could you explain why the Lagon Bleu page that i submitted was deleted? I need to make a wikipedia page for our NGO and i am struggling. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Lagon_Bleu&action=edit&redlink=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LagonBlue (talk • contribs) 06:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I deleted Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lagon Bleu because it was empty. It contained no content whatsoever and appeared to simply be a mistake.  If you wish to write an article about Lagon Bleu for the Articles for Creation process, please feel free to do so.  If you are having trouble with the process, please let me know and I'll try to help.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of team season NBA template
What possible reason could you have for deleting this template? Do you not check for the damage you do to other pages before you do such a thing? What in the world could this template possibly hurt??? This deletion is going to cause a major revamping of the NBA Post season drought page. Please let me know why in the world you did such a deletion. If there is not a technical reason, it was not appreciated, and it is causing damage to pages. Spparky (talk) 01:45, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It was a simple mistake. It was marked for speedy deletion by another user, and I don't recall what led me to think it was not in use.  I've restored it now.  Thanks for catching the error and letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 02:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much - saved a lot of rework. Spparky (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Problem with blocked editor
As you were the blocking admin of the last editor that was vandalizing articles I created, I'm wondering of you would know how I should handle this. Mobility99 was indef blocked for vandalism and edit warring. Several account have popped up with identical edits, attacks on articles I created. I filed a sockpuppet report as it's obvious it's the same person. However, with the frequency of new accounts appearing, all doing the same thing, what can be done? I can't imagine the whole list of articles I created being protected. This is a nuisance (obviously this editor's plan). Where can I go from here?  freshacconci  talk talk  00:30, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Filing the SPI is the right place to start. I've blocked all the accounts listed there that are currently active.  If others appear, report them there or let me know and I'll block.  Some of the targeted articles have already been protected, and you can request protection of any others that get targeted.  This kind of situation happens on occasion, but the good news is that most people like this realize the futility of what they are trying to do fairly quickly.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Azapropazone
I think there should be propyl chain instead of propenyl in the structure of azapropazone.
 * Yes, you're right. I have now fixed it.  Thanks.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
I would just like to thank you for blocking the IP address (208.66.198.76) that was vandalizing severly. --MGray98 (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm glad to help. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Atom AMPD
Hello Ed.

An article I submitted (Atom AMPD) has been deleted (May 8) due to copyright infringement. Assuming I can find the copyright infringement in the article I will delete and would like to resubmit the article. How should I proceed??

Thanks,

Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom Bergmann2 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Some of the text is taken directly from atomampd.com. At second look, there isn't all that much, so it's probably in the gray area between what would generally be considered (by Wikipedia's standards, which may err on the side of caution) a copyright violation and what would not.  So for now, I have restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Atom AMPD temporarily to give you a chance to work on it.  However, I suspect that the article will be turned down for other reasons.  As written, it does not appear to meet Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines for notability (see WP:CORP for details) and it is clearly promotional in tone.  Also, as an executive in the company you're writing about, you should probably have a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines as well.  I hope this helps. Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Block
You blocked 24.163.18.9 for 31 hours. Did you see the offensive edit to the BLP? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 17:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I hate to say it, but that kind of childish vandalism is common around here and is tame compared to a lot of what I see every day. A 31 hour block is standard practice for a dynamic IP that has only a few edits and has never been blocked before.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, but if they do it again in 31 hours it is not my fault. It was up there for more than 2 hours before I happened to see it.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 17:59, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for removing the vandalism from the article (I'm surprised the vandalism wasn't something that the bots would catch and automatically revert). And, yes, I agree that if they do it again it is certainly not your fault.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, with that wording, a bot usually gets it within a minute. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:19, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Angelina Ballerina Next Step false
Someone in putting false info article I made back in 2009 or 2010 Saying that Justin Beider and Hirlay Duff are the voice actors saying that they're teenager when they're really 8m and not citing the source. I edit it and cite the source, but that person edit it again with the false info, i don't know who the person is mich (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I don't know enough about Angelina Ballerina: The Next Steps to know what information is correct and what is false. I would recommend that you request assistance from a WikiProject where members will be more familiar with this topic than me.  Perhaps you can ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

There is one user who know more, call Nibbles29mich (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail

 * I don't think I received it. Unless we've corresponded before, I don't think you can even email me through Wikipedia without being a registered user.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Who do you work for Edgar? Psychiatry or Pharma Corp?
You're insistent removal of Side Effects from the Lurasidone talk page suggests you work for the Corporation itself or in the psychiatric profession in someway and are clearly trying to hide the bad effects of this drug for some self interest. 2602:306:C518:6C40:F02A:330C:11CC:ACDB (talk) 12:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Please read and understand the talk page guidelines linked on your user talk pages. Making silly unfounded accusations is not helpful.  I have no connection whatsoever with anyone that makes, sells, or prescribes lurasidone. If you continue to make such personal attacks or continue to disregard Wikipedia policies in other ways, you may be blocked from editing.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to take a short survey about communication and efficiency of WikiProjects for my research
Hi Ed, I'm working on a project to study the running of WikiProject and possible performance measures for it. I learn from WikiProject Chemicals talk page that you are an active member of the project. I would like to invite you to take a short survey for my study. If you are available to take our survey, could you please reply an email to me? I'm new to Wikipedia, I can't send too many emails to other editors due to anti-spam measure. Thank you very much for your time. Xiangju (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I wish you well on your project, but choose not to participate. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, Ed, it's OK. Also wish everything goes well with you. Xiangju (talk) 10:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

5-EAPB
You sure this is real? Not my field of expertise, but I can't find anything on it, even with the source. No patent found, no news, no web hits. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 15:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * This is very typical of the many articles we have on designer drugs. It doesn't appear notable to me.  Here's what I have found with a brief literature search.  The chemical structure doesn't appear in any chemical database (Chemical Abstracts, Reaxys, PubChem, ChemSpider, etc.) and therefore is unlikely to have ever appeared in the scientific literature. The cited patent describes a genus of chemical compounds which encompasses the structure given in the article, but I haven't looked closely enough to say that 5-EAPB is specifically described - at best 5-EAPB is simply just one of many related chemicals described in the patent.  I've tried to nominate such articles for deletion in the past on grounds of WP:GNG and WP:V without much success because there are too many editors here that are interested in cataloging all designer drugs no matter how unimportant they are.  If you would like send this one to AFD, I would support deletion.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't feel knowledgeable to defend it at AFD, although I would support a delete based on my findings. I ran across it quite accidentally while patrolling new articles and wasn't even able to verify it wasn't a hoax.  I was tempted to tag it as such, but again, it is so far out of my expertise it is best left to someone like you that is familiar.  Dennis Brown - 2¢  - © - @ - Join WER 16:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Revulcanizing Rubber
Dear Ed, Who and where can I talk to someone about de/revulcanizing rubber, or at least being able to attach two vulcanized pieces together? This would be useful for example in recycling inner tubes into garden hoses. Perhaps it would be better to talk over email? I saw that you were a major contributor to the Vulcanization page, but perhaps another contributor would be better to contact? Clejan (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you would like to start an article about revulcanizing rubber, you are free to do so at any time. If you would like input from others first, I would suggest asking at WikiProject Chemistry and anyone who is interested could give suggestions.  I'm not sure I have contributed much to vulcanization, and I'm not terribly familiar with the topic, but I can probably help out.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Deleted page
Hi Ed. I added a new page to the sandbox (re: Cefn Blaenau) but for some reason the text vanished and it saved blank, so you deleted it. I would like to try again but I'm not sure where to do this (either in the sandbox or edit the stub directly). As this is my first attempt i thought it best to use the sandbox but any advice would be welcome. Thanks.
 * I'm not sure what might have happened to make the text vanish. Hopefully you have a copy of it and haven't lost your work.  You can try the Articles for creation process again, or you can simply create a page titled something like "user:EJTBK/articlename".  You can then work on the article at that location and then when you think it is ready to be a Wikipedia article, you can move it to the appropriate title.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Phil Alexander
You blocked earlier today for vandalism at the Phil Alexander article; now evading as. I am INVOLVED or would block myself. GiantSnowman 17:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the new IP and semi-protected the article for a week. Thanks for letting me know.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Found the vandal
I decided to check the history on Angelina article and the found of who the user ins user name 2600:100c:b00b:c8da:5d:8744:6571:1160, was formerly call 70.195.193.202 since I block him. mich (talk) 22:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know if that's the same person or not, and I can't tell if that's even vandalism. In a situation like this, the best thing to do is to revert if you think the edit was wrong, warn the user, and report them to WP:AIV if they persist after several warnings.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Alleged use of Agent Orange in the recent protests in Turkey
Hello;

I am the user who edited the forementioned title today. I am aware that the added section had nothing to do with the title substance but today in Turkey, Agent Orange is a household name. And still the public is not %100 sure that it isn't being used. I had to investigate online to find solid proof that the substance the Turkish police is using isn't agent orange. So in my opinion any moderate internet user will go on the Agent Orange page in wikipedia for information. This is why i think the page should have an "alleged use in 2013 Turkey protests" section to clarify that the substance that is being used is not Agent Orange ( it is actually this substance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CR_gas). If Wikipedia is an environment that displays correct and helpful info, i can't think of a more appropriate case than this to help and illuminate people that are currently in distress. This state of disinformation and false assumption causes unrest in many Turkish internet users. Please take these into consideration. Please consider these to make Wikipedia a website that conveys more practical info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.219.111 (talk) 14:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it is still an issue of relevance. The problem you are describing is only temporary and local.  If it is a problem, it is an issue primarily for our Turkish readers and the confusion will not last long.  If the issue is to be discussed on Wikipedia, I think there are much better, more logical places for it, such as 2013 protests in Turkey, instead of at Agent Orange.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

The problem here is about general website navigation in my opinion. In this case I really believe many of the internet users will initially look for the Agent Orange page for quick information and the edit i made would probably be beneficial in the short run. At least for the following week. But since I am not in any way a chemistry or Wikipedia regulation authority I leave this to you. Actually this was my first non-grammatical edit. Thanks for replying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umit.Kybs (talk • contribs) 22:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558294637 your edit] to BW A444 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

User:Jgroup-me
Hi Edgar. Mind hardening the block on this guy? As you can see here, he's also been engaging in copyright violations and multiple-account abuse. — PinkAmpers  &#38;  ( Je vous invite à me parler )  11:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks like a good idea. I have blocked that account and User:IJomaa.  If there are other accounts, please let me know and I'll block those too.  Thanks, -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Deleted Page: Henry Hey
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Henry_Hey I wonder why you deleted the Henry Hey page. I imagine he is not totally insignificant, and he is certainly real: http://usa.yamaha.com/news_events/music_production/jazz-pianist-henry-hey-and-rocker-rod-stewart-meet-in-the-middle-on-album-of-american-standards/

I have no vested interest, while we are distantly related, I have never met Henry in person. - Jon Hey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonhey (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The entire content of the article at the time of deletion in 2008 was a single sentence fragment that was clearly insufficient to establish notability of the individual. The article consequently met criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD). If you believe that Henry Hey meets Wikipedia guidelines for inclusion (see WP:BIO and WP:BAND for details) and you would like to write an article about him, the prior deletion does not preclude you from doing so. Hope this helps, -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

I have to say...
...this may be one of the most unintentially hilarious article titles I've seen in a long time.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * They taste good together... :) -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

ummm....
Talk page access needs to be removed from User talk:Tajik Stan now please - I guess I can't go over WP:3RR by reverting...? Mdann52 (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The 3 revert rule doesn't apply to vandalism. I have revoked talk page access now.  Thanks for letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Saroglitazar
Hi! First, thanks for starting Saroglitazar. Second, could you have a look at the structure you gave in the chembox? Per http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/druginformation/innlists/PL108_Final.pdf, this isn't saroglitazar but roxadustat. Or am I missing something? Cheers --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 13:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Changed for now. Feel free to revert if I'm wrong. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You're right. I seem to have gotten the structure and chemical data from the adjacent listing in that document.  Thanks for catching the mistake and fixing it! -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Pleasure :-) --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Faldaprevir
Hey Edgar181. You reverted my edit on Faldaprevir, which was to add a "more footnotes" tag. I was not disputing that the references were inline, I was disputing that there were enough inline citations - not in the sense of necessarily needing more sources, but in the sense of needing the sources there are to be cited more. That article contains five prose sentences and three of them, all at the end of paragraphs, completely lack inline citations. If you can suggest a better tag, feel free to WP:BOLDly overwrite mine, but in the future please reach out if you've got a problem with an edit I've made and talk to me about it. Ironholds (talk) 14:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I must have misread it as the No footnotes template. Looks fine to me now.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Great! Thanks :). Ironholds (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Adaptol
Thank you for catching Adaptol - I put it through and cleaned it up because it was well written and referenced. Many thanks for spotting a duplicate. Jamesx12345 (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. It wasn't obvious since "Adaptol" wasn't mentioned at melitracen, and "melitracen" wasn't mentioned at Adaptol.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Chem diagrams
Thanks for creating that Yunnanxane diagram so quick! I was hoping you could also create one for Taxusin. Much thanks Jatlas (talk) 20:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'd be happy to do so. I'll be able to do it a little later today.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:47, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Edgar, you are awesome. Anyway you could generate some diagrams for this pending page? I'm thinking three diagrams in a column would bring this to article status. ⚶best regards⚶ Jatlas (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Here they are: File:Hongdoushan A.svg File:Hongdoushan B.svg File:Hongdoushan C.svg -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much Edgar. Taxinine M is the last taxane that needs a diagram. ⚛best regards⚛ Jatlas (talk) 16:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Here it is: File:Taxanine M.svg.  Enjoy!  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Edgar. I'm happy to say there is one more taxane that needs a diagram.. ♒big thanks♒ Jatlas (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm traveling this weekend, but will be happy to create that diagram on Monday. -- Ed (Edgar181) 02:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Here it is: File:Decinnamoyltaxinine_J.svg. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Edgar. You are awesome with chemical diagrams. Thank you for the diagram for DiI. Would it be possible for you to help with the diagram (and parts of the chembox) for INT (Chemical)? No hurries. Thanks --Dr.saptarshi (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I created it and added it to the page. Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Edgar. Anyway you could generate some diagrams for these taxanes, Taxuspine A and Taxuspine B? -thanks in advance Jatlas (talk) 20:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Taxuspine_A.svg and file:Taxuspine_B.svg. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Updating Links to Citations
Hi Edgar,

Sorry for the username infraction. My name is Andrew and I'm the webmaster to MyjestikBlog.com. It has since changed to Myjestik.com and I was just updating the links to articles that people use from my site. I tried again, but I don't believe I was logged in. Some of the links were reverting back to the old site. Once I finish updating links on various sites, I'll get rid of MyjestikBlog.com. I just want to make sure all the links are accounted for. If I can't do it, maybe someone with more Wiki clout can.

Old link: http://www.myjestikblog.com/source-ranks-top-50-lyricists/ New link: http://www.myjestik.com/source-ranks-top-50-lyricists/

The link can be seen on this pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Daddy_Kane http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Pun http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Busta_Rhymes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canibus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru_(rapper) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gza http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_Cube http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_Man http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mos_Def http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakim http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarface_(rapper) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slick_Rick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Notorious_B.I.G.

If you, or someone can make sure the links stay current, I'd greatly appreciate it.

Thank you, Andrew — Preceding unsigned comment added by BornDrew (talk • contribs) 01:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks like someone else has already removed the links entirely.  There are currently no links to either myjestikblog.com or myjestik.com anywhere on Wikipedia except on this page.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Looks like they took the link out that I edited and replaced them with citation needed tags. I did the edits with my old Myjestik username. Could it be because of the username infraction that the links were deleted altogether? BornDrew (talk) 22:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think it was the username issue. The links were removed by User:Noq with edit summaries such as "remove blog link that does not back up claim ", so it looks like an issue of reliable sourcing (WP:RS) and verifiability (WP:V), but it would be best to ask Noq himself.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thank you.BornDrew (talk) 23:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Because you made an image change and added the ChemBox. :-)

Josh M (talk) 01:17, 13 June 2013 (UTC) 


 * Thanks, I'm glad to help out. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Methylene blue
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Methylene blue. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Nalmexone
Looks like your image that isbeing disputed on the main page and the Talk page. See Talk:Nalmexone. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I have now corrected the image.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Sunifiram - External links
Why was the Pubmed external link for sunifiram removed without so much as a reason? --IO Device (talk) 00:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * According to the policy on external links (WP:EL), links to search result pages are to be avoided. If there are specific items in the search results that would be useful for the article to link to, it would be best to link them directly.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 19:57, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Emotional Jukebox
wondering why this was removed by you as  Non-notable music by artist with no Wikipedia article see below

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Chorney

Linda Chorney was the fist Independent artist nominated for a Grammy where legends were the only ones recognized prior. Emotional Jukebox was the body of work recognized for Best Americana Album for the 54th Grammy Awards. The industry was not happy bout this due to the fact that she was virtually unknown in the circles of the Americana Music Association, a group of genre protectors.. so ask if you have an association with them, and why something historically factual might have been removed, and what was the motivation

I am not a contributor or a writer, but in the realm of fairness and information I would like this to be noted and linked to the article below

Grammy Award for Best Americana Album From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Grammy Award for Best Americana Album

Gilded gramophone trophy presented to Grammy Award winners Awarded for	quality Americana albums Country	United States Presented by	National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences First awarded	2010 Last awarded	2013 Official website	grammy.com The Grammy Award for Best Americana Album is an honor presented to recording artists for quality albums in the Americana music genre at the Grammy Awards, a ceremony that was established in 1958 and originally called the Gramophone Awards.[1] Honors in several categories are presented at the ceremony annually by the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences of the United States to "honor artistic achievement, technical proficiency and overall excellence in the recording industry, without regard to album sales or chart position".[2] In 2009, the Academy announced that the award for Best Contemporary Folk/Americana Album would be split into two separate categories: Best Contemporary Folk Album and Best Americana Album.[3][4] The distinction between the two award categories is based on the use of acoustic versus electric instruments; acoustic instruments predominate in "contemporary folk" and electric instruments are characteristic of Americana.[4] Jed Hilly, executive director of the Americana Music Association, called the new category's inclusion "a huge acknowledgment" of the music genre.[5] Hilly admitted to working hard at convincing the Academy to include Americana as its own category.[6][7] The music industry had been using the term "Americana music" for about 15 years before the new award was created.[4] Following is the award's purpose, according to the category description guide from the 2011 Grammy Awards: Americana is contemporary music that incorporates elements of various American roots music styles, including country, roots-rock, folk, bluegrass, R&B and blues, resulting in a distinctive roots-oriented sound that lives in a world apart from the pure forms of the genres upon which it may draw. While acoustic instruments are often present and vital, Americana also often uses a full electric band.[8] The award was first presented in 2010 to Levon Helm at the 52nd Grammy Awards for the album Electric Dirt.[9] The second winner, in 2011, was Mavis Staples. Helm, Willie Nelson and Lucinda Williams are the only artists to be nominated more than once.[9] Contents [hide] 1 Recipients 2 See also 3 References 4 External links Recipients[edit]

2010 and 2012 award recipient Levon Helm performing in 2004 Year[I]	Performing artist(s)	Nationality	Work	Nominees	Ref. 2010	Levon Helm	 United States	Electric Dirt Bob Dylan – Together Through Life Willie Nelson and Asleep at the Wheel – Willie and the Wheel Wilco – Wilco (The Album) Lucinda Williams – Little Honey [6] 2011	Mavis Staples	 United States	You Are Not Alone Rosanne Cash – The List Los Lobos – Tin Can Trust Willie Nelson – Country Music Robert Plant – Band of Joy [10] 2012	Levon Helm	 United States	Ramble at the Ryman Linda Chorney – Emotional Jukebox Ry Cooder – Pull Up Some Dust and Sit Down Emmylou Harris – Hard Bargain Lucinda Williams – Blessed [11] 2013	Bonnie Raitt	 United States	Slipstream The Avett Brothers – The Carpenter John Fullbright – From the Ground Up The Lumineers – The Lumineers Mumford & Sons – Babel [12] [13] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottfadynich (talk • contribs) 12:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * One criteria for deletion is WP:CSD: "An article about a musical recording that has no corresponding article about its recording artist". At the time that I deleted Emotional Jukebox several years ago, there was no article for Linda Chorney, so the article about the album was appropriately deleted.  Since there is now an article for the artist, I have no objection if you want to write an article for the album.  Since the album itself may not have much notability, there probably isn't a real need for standalone article for it and it might be better to just include whatever you would like to say about it on the artist's page instead.  For now, I have simply redirected Emotional Jukebox to Linda Chorney. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Egg Oil
Why did you undo my edit on Egg Oil? Do you have any knowledge of the subject? Why do you consider a reputed Chinese Journal "unreliable source" merely because you do not understand the language? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.173.131.76 (talk) 22:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Please stop using Wikipedia to promote your company and its products. You will continue to be blocked from editing for as long as you do so.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Mass CSD nominations of news anchors
Hi Edgar. Looks as if we have been working simultaneously  on  the same issues. User talk:75.15.215.12 has tagged over 20 such articles for deletion  in  rapid succession  today and I  have also  reverted one. I'm not  sure about  the others. There may be an agenda here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I reverted all the CSD nominations. Clearly they were not well considered nominations.  Since the IP editor continued the rapid fire nominations after I asked him to stop, I also blocked for 24 hours.  I'd be happy to unblock if the editor is willing to talk, but he has simply blanked the page.  So there's probably nothing else to do for now.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I've also blocked his other IP  address for block  evasion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked 4 IPs by now. To make other admins aware, I started a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Glad to see we've got vigilant Wikipedians on the case, noted the CSD for Fred Roggin was declined, but was unsure whether undoing the CSD addition to Kent Shocknek was a technical no-no of some sort, agreed that these are poor nominations.Boogerpatrol (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Link to site www.aluminum-production.com on Wikipedia page about Aluminum
Hi Edgar. Some days ago I have added to the External Links section of the Wikipedia page the site www.aluminum-production.com. This link has been removed. Since this site is entirely devote to explain with a lot of details how the aluminum production process works, I thought it wouldn't be considered as link spamming. I would kindly ask you to go to that site and check if its content is appropriate for that Wikipedia voice and others too related to aluminum production processLonelyMountain (talk) 11:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The link you added to multiple articles was removed by several different editors. I suspect that because you were adding the same link to so many articles, it appeared to those editors that you were simply trying to promote the website (spamming).  Since your entire set of contributions to Wikipedia has been to add external links to various articles, I can understand that conclusion.  There does seem to be some useful information on the website, but it might be better to link to specific, more relevant subpages instead of just the website's front page.  I removed the link once with the comment "this has been repeatedly removed by different editors - please get consensus on the talk page first" and that advice stands.  Please use the articles' talk pages to suggest adding the link to the articles and see what other editors think.  If others agree with you that it is useful, then it can be added.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Aliento de Vida Ministries
Hello Edgar, I apologize about the page of Aliento de Vida Minsitries. I just copied some information about this Christian Music band. This is my first time using Wikipedia and I think I didn't understand how to use the Sandbox to experiment with writing an article. Was not my intention to publish it, but to go step by step and try to make a good article. Please would you help me? Thank you in advance... What should I do in order to be unblocked? Thanks and have a good one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.4.195 (talk) 04:04, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand - Wikipedia can be a bit confusing at first for newcomers. I blocked the username  and deleted the user page because Wikipedia usernames are not permitted to match the name of organizations (see WP:USERNAME for details).  You are free to sign up with a new account.  If you would like to create an article for Aliento de Vida Ministries and you think it meets Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion (see WP:BAND) for details), you are free to do so.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Neoeriocitrin
Hello Edgar, thanks for your cleanup of Neoeriocitrin article. Have a nice day, Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm glad to help. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Unblock
You blocked an IP address, so none of my students from an entire class are able to edit in Wikipedia. Please unblock. I hope you only blocked the IP address temporarily. Your edit history does not indicate that you posted a warning or block notice, so I'm having trouble figuring out exactly what you blocked. I'll go look up that IP address now. Incidentally, you blocked an educational institution. Wikipedia has some strict rules about that. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Here we go. User Rockbaum used our lab. Rockbaum appears to have been blocked appropriately. Blocking our university lab's IP address is not appropriate, not that you had reason to know that would happen necessarily. Odds are that you have no idea what I'm talking about because Rockbaum inserted childish sentences into articles back on June 11. The "Autoblock any IP addresses used" would have blocked our university lab IP address because of him today. I had to change that setting on the block and I hope students can use it.  Doczilla  @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I know full well when it's appropriate to block an IP address. I think it's a bit unfair for you to accuse me of not doing it appropriately before even knowing the situation.  The block on Rockbaum is over five years old and consequently not related to the problem you are you are experiencing.  Changing the block settings on a five year old block won't help.  If you can tell me the IP address you are having problems with, I would be happy to help out. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Anna Frodesiak ?
Do you know any admin by that name ? The vandal had the the Angelina Ballerina page again when the protection was remove. I reported to the WP:AIV and Anna Frodesiak said that it wasn't vandalism. Is this person really a admin?mich (talk) 04:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, that editor is an administrator. If you have a question about a decision she made, it would be best to ask her about it first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

MDUK
Hi Edgar. RE: block request for the spamlinker MDUK. The user has been warned previously, by MelbourneStar, about spamming, adding innapropriate linsk, removing referenced links and also incivility, but not on his own talkpage. See:- Editing Glossop Richard Harvey (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I hadn't seen that.  I have put that user on my watchlist and I will block immediately if the problem persists.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Ublock notice?
You recently ABD-ublocked - but you did not leave the standard uw-ublock notice on his/her talk page - why? hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 03:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Because I used " " as the summary for the block, the user will see the templated message when they attempt to edit.  Normally, I also add the template to the user talk page, so they will see it even if they don't attempt to edit, but I guess I just missed that one for some reason.  I've added it now.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Request deletion per RD2.
Hi, I noticed you are on the Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests and was wondering if you could delete a recent revision on the article for Judy Murray which appears sufficiently...bad to warrant deletion. Thanks. --Somchai Sun (talk) 13:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, that edit certainly warrants revdel. It is now hidden.  Thanks for letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks and no problem. --Somchai Sun (talk) 15:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Deleting Allyzone Content
he I just need explanation for deletion of content of Allyzone — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunilpandey1991 (talk • contribs) 05:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It was a short article about a company that did not assert any kind of notability. It also was promotional in tone.  It therefore met criteria for speedy deletion (both WP:CSD and WP:CSD).   -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

IP Vandal at Bad Girls Club Hoaxing again.
The IP you blocked is back as 201.1.181.130 Sigh. Capitalismojo (talk) 03:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the IP and protected the page for two weeks. Thanks for letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of talk page for Beblawi cabinet
Hello, I wanted to create a talk page for the Beblawi Cabinet page and noticed that it had previously been deleted. Can I go ahead and create it again?David O. Johnson (talk) 06:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I can't see that Beblawi Cabinet has been created or deleted before you created it today. It looks fine to me.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * David O. Johnson is talking about the talk page of the article which you deleted 11. july. But (David O. Johnson), you are welcome to recreate it again :-) Christian75 (talk) 10:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I see now. I deleted Talk:Beblawi Cabinet under WP:CSD as a talk page for a non-existent article.  That should not be considered a reason to avoid creating the article itself.  Thanks Christian75.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

General Notability on Acetylacetonates
Hey Edgar181, I've noticed that you marked the three articles I created yesterday as potentially not meeting the general notability guidelines of wikipedia. What sort of information am I missing? I have seen articles about very similar compounds that warranted being on wikipedia with about the same amount of information. What is the difference between my articles and these ones? For example, Palladium(II) acetylacetonate is one of these compounds. I am not calling your judgement into question, I would just like some tips and/or suggestions on how to proceed. Thanks for your time, Calvinatlan (talk) 17:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I added the template to those new articles because they don't contain any content that suggests they have any notability. For example, are they used for any specific purpose?  I'm not sure that palladium(II) acetylacetonate would meet the notability guidelines either, but one difference is that at least it has a sentence describing a use.  Articles about chemical compounds that don't assert notability occasionally get deleted, and the notability tag was intended more as a request for additional information in the article than anything else.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Won't bother you with this stuff anymore, but for future reference, is something like this enough to warrant notability? If so, can I remove the tag myself, or should I wait for an admin/moderator to do it? Thanks for helping me out Calvinatlan (talk) 20:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not a bother at all. And yes, the additions to cerium acetylacetonate are the kind of thing I meant.  You can remove the tag yourself.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment on a matter regarding speedy deletion of a redirect
Hi Edgar,

Could you please go to my talk page and comment on a CSD request of the redirect Nu jack swing? You'll also find relevant discussions on the redirect creator's talk page and the redirect's own talk page. Kind regards, -- Forward  Unto   Dawn  10:38, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The creator of the redirect shouldn't be the one to remove the CSD tags, but the redirect looks perfectly acceptable to me. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:33, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I was mainly concerned by this user's removal of the CSD tag following a contested deletion discussion in which they were the only participant. Once I saw the Google search result, I was satisfied that the redirect was acceptable.-- Forward  Unto   Dawn  10:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

GAR
Lithium, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 00:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Egg oil
Why has the entire section on Burns on the page Egg Oil been deleted? If animal studies are not adequate, they can be accordingly mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.97.100 (talk) 12:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned in my edit summary, the content that I removed was not supported by adequate sources. Information about medical uses needs to be based on references that are compliant with the guidelines at Identifying reliable sources (medicine).  Using references that describe studies performed on animals, for example, are not sufficient for a medical use claim.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

In this case, the claims can be suitably edited or qualified as based on animal studies instead of deleting the entire section completely. The readers have a right to be informed about potential uses even if they are based on initial animal studies. All drug discoveries start with animal studies or patent claims before the drug is taken to human trials. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.97.100 (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter where drug discoveries start. The consensus at Wikipedia is that we don't report those discoveries until they are medical uses that are discussed in reliable secondary sources .  If you disagree with this policy, you may work to change it, but you are not free to violate the policy just because you disagree with it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Anti-vandal thanks
Thanks for your fast help with the vandal at 2601:9:3300:7B:911A:E537:316F:F010! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm glad to help. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Hitachi ID Systems, Inc.
Hello Edgar, our wikipedia page Hitachi ID Systems has been deleted. We are wondering how we can make the changes necessary to restore the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnlinepresenceHID (talk • contribs) 20:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hitachi ID Systems was deleted about a year ago by the administator User:INeverCry. His reasoning was "Unambiguous advertising or promotion".  Looking at the content of the deleted article, I would agree with that rationale. The promotional content of the article was added by you.  If you want to recreate the article you should first make sure that it meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion (WP:CORP) and you would need to write a neutrally worded article about the company.  However, it appears you have a clear conflict of interest and you should also have a look at Wikipedia's relevant policy in that regard: WP:COI.  In general, I would advise you to simply wait until someone else writes the article.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Diketopiperazine vs 2,5-...
Alandb had actually done a cut'n'paste move of the former 2,5- specific isomer, to 2,5-Diketopiperazines, leaving Diketopiperazine as a newly written page about all the isomers. I left him a note about c&p being a problem. Now you have revived the 2,5- specific but also kept the general. Would be safer to do the actual pagemove and then revive the general from scratch? DMacks (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice that there was a separate article created. Thanks for letting me know.  In my opinion, the content really isn't long enough or in depth enough to warrant splitting - the content of the two articles would be best handled in a single article.  Currently, that could be achieved by simply redirecting 2,5-Diketopiperazines to Diketopiperazine.  I'll leave a comment to that effect with Alandb. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. This was a preliminary move with  the aim to fully rewrite the 2,5-Diketopiperazines article, that I’m in the process of doing, by condensing a recent review I wrote on the subject covering the last 20 years (doi:10.1021/cr200398y.). So this article will be a lot longer and I would prefer to keep the two separate articles one being a subset of the other as in Oxadiazoles and 1,2,5-oxadiazole ManyThanks. Alanb (Alandb (talk) 09:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC))
 * In that case, I don't mind if you want to revert my edit to Diketopiperazine, and I'll wait until you're done expanding the articles. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=568002950 your edit] to Soman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * //proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/2wg1 2wg1], and 1som.

212.36.226.185 revdel
I think you missed a diff here on Sadomasochism when Revision Deleting edits made by. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:41, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I see now, they were different people. Anyway, use your discretion. Cheers! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the edits from that IP now too. Thanks for catching that and letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * FYI There's also this previous, identical diff on the WikiLeaks page. --Rhododendrites (talk) 21:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * That IP only had one other edit here with the same idea. --Rhododendrites (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I got those now. If there are still more out there, please let me know and I'll take care of them.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:North American Water and Power Alliance
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:North American Water and Power Alliance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Passiflora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Your free Cochrane account is on its way!
Please fill out this very short form to receive your free access to Cochrane Collaboration's library of medical reviews: Link to form.

If you have any questions, just ask me. Cheers, Ocaasi 13:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)