User talk:Edgar181/Archive32

Polyphenylsulfone - well intentioned - request advice
Edgar - I write you as a complete newby. I did my best to improve the stub on the polymer "Polyphenylsulfone" in mid-December ... And it seems I "boldly" screwed up, as my edits were quickly reverted due to a copyright violation?

As there were and remain no talk sections related to the stub, should I repost the information there as a draft to identify the issues? If the concern is the link to Solvay.com cited as a reference, I can remove it or organize the needed license, as I'm an engineer at the corporation.

My apologies for any disruptions I have caused ... Not my intent at all.

My thanks in advance.

Dane Cdwaund (talk) 03:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your interest in improving that article. However, the content I removed was copied word-for-word from a document on solvay.com. For legal reasons, Wikipedia simply cannot accept copyrighted text like that, except under very limited conditions.  See WP:COPVIO for details or see Donating copyrighted materials if that applies.  If you wish to expand the content of the article at polyphenylsulfone, please do so by writing in your own words.  Also, you might want to have a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines which seem relevant here.  If you have additional questions, please feel free to let me know.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Regarding the link removal 14:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Edgar181, Still you not reply, please inform me the reason, why you delete the link? give me perfect reason or revert your decision & add the link back in article. Else inform me where i will add it, because i was so much time consuming to find the link, according to article. thanks14:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You promptly deleted the messages you left for me, so I naturally assumed that you had changed your mind about wanting a reply. I removed the link because it is completely inappropriate for Wikipedia.  I think it is a very low quality website with no purpose but to be promotional. Please do not add it again.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Regarding user:64.251.54.61's talk page
Thank you for blocking that vandal IP. I noticed that you blanked 47k bytes of text when you left the block notice. I was just wondering if that was intentional. Thanks. Boomer Vial (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was intentional. Older messages are often removed from user talk pages for shared IPs.  Those old messages, up to 10 years old in this case, are irrelevant.  I left the OW template that notes old messages can be found in the page history.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, I just wanted to make sure it was, and bring it to your attention if it wasn't. Cheers. :) Boomer Vial (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Human spaceflight
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Human spaceflight. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Alzheimer's disease
I am sorry. It's the first time I try to add an information on Wikipedia and I don't even know how to answer your questions. Hope you will receive this message. The book reference I tried to add to different articles is a very important and new scientific book about DHA and Alzheimer, describing mechanisms in the brain that have never been described before. I am working at Actia, editor of this book. There is no financial interest about it, the book is free and we work for food research. We just want these scientific informations to be in free access to the scientists.

I surely have not use the right way with Wikipedia.

But I am sure it could be interessant for Wikipedia to let it appear.

Thank you to answer me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.160.104.44 (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * (I'm assuming you are User:Anne-lise-marie.) Wikipedia operates by consensus.  If an edit you are making is repeatedly undone by other users you should not continue to make the same edit.  Please use the article's talk page (such as Talk:Alzheimer's disease) to explain why you think reference to the book should be added to the article.  If other editors agree, then it can be added.   If other editors disagree, then it shouldn't be added.  Also, please have a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy which seems to apply here.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Question
Could you please tell what is the correct noticeboard to notify about promotional username? user:Пресса Клюев Сергей, meaning Serhiy Klyuyev Press in Russian, has made a large amount of additions to the relevant article Serhiy Klyuyev. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The place to notify about promotional usernames is WP:UAA. I have gone ahead and blocked the username, so you don't have to report this one, but you'll know where to go in the future.  Also, you might consider WP:COIN if you have concerns about the neutrality of the edits this user has made.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Beagel (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please unblock me
Hi, I am employed at Skissernas Museum in Lund, Sweden and work with communication and strategy. I created an account to be able to edit information regarding our museum that in many ways was inaccurate. Next time I logged in you had blocked me and I can not see the reason why? Since I work at the museum which article I was editing I think that I would have the most accurate information and be the most competent person to write that article. I am not editing any other information on wikipedia accept for the articles regarding the museum. I see no reason to why I should be blocked for an indefinite amount of time. I am new at wikipedia but I should get the chance to learn! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.235.8.108 (talk • contribs)
 * I'm sorry but if you want to know why I blocked an account, you have to tell me the name of the account that you are referring to. What is the username?  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * MY username is Skissernas museum official, but since I am blocked I can not even log in...
 * You should still be able to log in even if you are blocked from editing. Usernames are case sensitive, so make sure you are using the correct capitalization (your username appears to be "Skissernas Museum Official", not "Skissernas museum official".  I blocked the account named Skissernas Museum Official because Wikipedia has a policy that usernames should not match the name of an organization.  You may simply sign up for a new account with an appropriate username that represents you rather than your organization.  Or you can follow the directions on your user talk page, User talk:Skissernas Museum Official, to request that your account be renamed (signing up with different username is easier though).  Finally, you might want to have a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines which seem to apply here.  I hope this helps.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Chemistry articles by User:Gladissk
A few articles he created popped up on my radar for various reasons. I saw many major problems in each I examined similar to the problems you saw--bogus infobox values and hopelessly invalid (WP mirror) sourcing. I also looked at some refs, and some don't-support or actually-contradict some of his biomedical claims. Have you had any interaction with him other than following up behind his edits? DMacks (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've noticed a few of the new articles this editor has created, but to be honest I don't think I looked too closely at the content and referencing (aside from the EDDP article) and I haven't directly interacted with him either. I'll take some time to review other articles he has created.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Bananaramy
Hi Edgar181

The article 'The Jupiter Drawing Room' is not self-promotional as you indicated as reason for deletion. As Africa's largest independent advertising agency group and its contributions to advertising internationally, there is merit in having the page on public record.

It is also my first article, so if there were errors in my formatting, or a way that I can improve the article's legitimacy I would appreciate pointers.

Thanks and regards, Bananaramy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bananaramy (talk • contribs) 15:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I did not indicate "self-promotional" as a reason for the page deletion. A user page is for presenting information about yourself or your Wikipedia activities.  Since the page contained promotional-sounding text for a business, I don't think it is appropriate use of your user page.  Since you indicate a desire to develop it as an article, I have restored it and moved it to Draft:The Jupiter Drawing Room where you can work on it and then submit it through the Articles for Creation process when it is ready.  Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Right, thanks for your help and sorry for the confusion. I'm still getting the hang of it. Best, Amy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bananaramy (talk • contribs) 07:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

"Is it too late now to say sorry?" "It's too late too apologize"
I'm terribly sorry for what happened,this excuse may be used by many,but honestly,my 10 yr-old cousin constantly messes around with WikiPedia,thinking anyone can edit almost anything to their liking. Please forgive me.
 * Every single edit from your account has been vandalism. If it occurs again, you will be blocked from editing.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Sure,truth is I just created this account,and accidentally kept myself signed in(for 30 days without logging out). I'll make sure my cousin stays off this machine

User:RichardHuishCollege
Hi Edgar,

I work at and my colleague has recently updated our Wikipedia page (user - RichardHuishCollege) as it was terribly out of date. It appears you have now blocked her and there is a warning on our page. Would it be possible to have the block removed and also the box removed. The information is accurate and factual and does not sell the college in any way. Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tilly4p (talk • contribs) 16:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia usernames are not permitted to match the name of an organization. That is why I blocked User:RichardHuishCollege.  The individual who created that account is free to sign up with a different username instead.  Or she can follow the directions in the box at the bottom of User talk:RichardHuishCollege to request having her account renamed (though just signing up with a new account is much easier).  Although blocked from editing elsewhere, User:RichardHuishCollege may still edit her user talk page and remove the warnings if she wishes to.  Finally, both of you should familiarize yourselves with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines before editing Richard Huish College, Taunton any further.  The edits made to the article appear highly promotional in tone and content and likely violate Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view.  I hope this helps.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Eldergeese
The user involved its same pattern of Pistolplay4, Strawberrygirls and Strawberryswisher. 219.92.117.31 (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not a checkuser, so I am unable to determine if it is the same individual. It would be best to file a report at Sockpuppet investigations/River Stumpf.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Help
The Pyriproxyfen page looks like the beginning of an edit war. I noticed you had edited there before. 96.41.40.154 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The connection to the Zika virus shouldn't be added to the article unless/until there is a WP:MEDRS-compliant source making the connnection. I'll continute to keep an eye on the article.   -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I knew that was an inappropriate entry. I didn't know the proper reason for changing it. 96.41.40.154 (talk) 05:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Question. I just came across another medical article that has a very wooish POV. Where in wikipedia do you go to get someone to look at it. I am not familiar with wikipedia policies or methods. Thanks.96.41.40.154 (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I would suggest bringing it to the attention of other editors at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Question
Hi, I see that you're active admin. Do you can corect my English and few other things in my sandbox? See also it Thanx and regards. Dawid2009 (talk) 15:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I can take a look and help out, but you certainly don't need an administrator to do it. Anyone can. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanx for your help :) Dawid2009 (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

About the disruptive IP
Please don't block any users which may be connected to the IP. A few editors including me have said to administrators that they have been unable to edit Wikipedia for a long time due to the behavior of this anonymous user. Thanks. Promotional Attack (talk) 19:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I blocked 2.102.10.250 before seeing this message. However, it is an anonymous-only block, meaning it should not affect registered users who share the same IP.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Ed, sorry to bother again - .250 might need their talk page editing revoked for a bit per this edit? -- samtar whisper 20:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem. Talk page access is now revoked.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Delete of VipXGamer
Hi, sorry to collar you but you were the last admin to edit in my watchlist - if you have a mo could you look at VipXGamer and delete (CSD A7)? Thanks --  samtar whisper 19:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You're a star, thanks - I've left a message above about that IP -- samtar whisper 20:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Paolo Thrift
In December, you blocked this user as a sock (of User:Caradoc29105) and deleted his user page and user talk page. Could you check if there were any other contributors to those pages? The sockmaster sometimes has other socks that exclusively edit in the userspace of another sock. Thanks, ansh 666 23:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * was the only editor to make contributions to either User:Paolo Thrift or User talk:Paolo Thrift. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for checking! ansh 666 23:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Star Alliance
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Star Alliance. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Silver diamine fluoride
Hello Edgar181, I see the edits that were recently made to the Silver Diamine Fluoride page recently regarding the removal of billing and insurance coverage information for the chemistry and it's application. This edit was made by a bot, but I'm not sure how best to request the material be replaced on the site.

I am a product manager for one of these devices/drugs, and coding information is the single most frequent question we receive from dental providers. Having this information on the wikipedia page has been instrumental in providing true, referenced guidance and information to an industry that is confused by insurance provider coverage. I'd like to ask that this information remain on the page as it is an immense help to the dental industry and has allowed numerous clinicians to find pertinent information about the technology and their ability to use it. Thanks. Steve — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spardue13 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think that content is appropriate at all for an encyclopedia article. The purpose of the page is to provide information about silver diamine fluoride itself, not to provide you with a way to communicate with your customers about your product that contains silver diamine fluoride.  I hope you can appreciate that distinction.  In any case, since you have a financial conflict of interest related to this topic, Wikipedia's guidelines suggest that you should not be editing the article at all.  I have left a message on your talk page regarding these guidelines so that you can learn more about them.  Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into the local language

Thanks again :) -- Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Ketamine
On the Wikipedia page for Ketamine, there is a typo on reference number 59 after the word female. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.61.60.145 (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Surely it would take less effort to just fix it than to tell me about it. In any case, it's fixed. Cheers, -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk page
See editing talk page. --Russian editor (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I have reverted their edits and it looks like admin Materialscientist has already revoked talk page access. Regards,  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stack Overflow
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stack Overflow. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop putting up the wrong skeletal formula for pyrazolam
picture: 8-Bromo-1-methyl-6-(pyridin-2-yl)-4H-[1,5-a]imidazo[4,3-a][1,4]benzodiazepine ( some sort of midazolam analogue which was never marketed either as a research chemical nor as a pharmaceutical... the 8-nitro version might be worth making)

midazolam 8-chloro-6-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H-imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine

pyrazolam 8-Bromo-1-methyl-6-(pyridin-2-yl)-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]benzodiazepine ( https://i.imgur.com/wAlojC2.png ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:EE2:600:900:4906:E8D4:8B47:F397 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC) --2A00:EE2:600:900:4906:E8D4:8B47:F397 (talk) 00:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)benzo expert
 * File:Pyrazolam-skeletal.svg, which I added the article, was originally correct. Then someone made a change to the file on Commons in which a nitrogen atom was dropped.  I have restored it to the correct structure.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Is it standard for the pictures to use this color scheme? Can we at least use colored atoms this one is a bit bland ( example - http://imgur.com/qIcvkDz lookd interesting to me) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benzo expert (talk • contribs) 15:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It is standard for chemical structure drawings on Wikipedia to be black and white. All the details about the "house style" have been collected at Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing.  In general, I've mainly seen colors in chemical structures only used to highlight specific features being discussed in the text.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, I just wanted to say thanks for catching the error in the pyrazolam image. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:28, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Please Delete My Entire Account Permanently
I don't wish to use wikipedia anymore, moderator named Deli nk is very mean.

Edgar, please delete my account (not only the talk page). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axa2016 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, Wikipedia accounts cannot be deleted. Administrators do not have the technical ability to do so.  If you do not wish to edit Wikipedia any more, you may simply abandon the account.  With the content of your user talk page removed, the end result is essentially indistinguishable from what you're asking for anyway.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for closing the debate on miso with an encouraging note!
What you and said was very encouraging and created a very positive and workable closure to the debate. I will ask the students to merge their content. I will also discuss the with to improve the Moving out of the Sandbox process in future assignments in my course. JudyCChan (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm glad to help. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Wild Falcons Moto Club
Can you perform a username/promotional account block here? . Thanks! Ralletsretni (talk) 22:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. However, it's probably not worth worrying about accounts like this unless they edit.  A surprising number of usernames are created and then never used.  It just makes extra work to report them and have an administrator block them.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Something strange going on at shades of red.
A while back I reported as IPv6 subnet to AIV for making strange edits every 15 to 30 days. You can see the report here report. You declined stating that the user seemed to moved on, but the pattern of every 15/30 days continues. My guess is that the are part of a system using wikipedia and wikipedia commons as part of a file-sharing scheme. If you look at the edit history they will blank the page replacing it with a bunch of links to uploaded files and then revert back immediately. My assumption is that those edits are used as indexes to the files. I wonder if it's related to something like this. this. PaleAqua (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree that something strange is going on at that article. I've read about the file sharing scheme you link to, so I understand what you are speculating about.  But after a brief look at the page history, I'm unable to find any version that appears to have external links to uploaded files.  If you can point to any edits that have such links, I will use revdel on them so that they are no longer visible in the history.  In the meantime, I'll semi protect the page for awhile.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * All the edits in question seem to come from the range 2601:8c:4004:af05::/64 and there appear to be no constructive edits from that range, so I have applied a range block. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Looking further into the history of the article, I see some instances where the page was replaced with externals links. I have hidden those revisions.  If I've missed any, please let me know and I'll take care of those too.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. If I see any more I'll let you know. PaleAqua (talk) 14:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Confusion about Oligomycin (A)
Hey Edgar, I'm trying to wrap my head around the image used for Oligomycin A. The old version you uploaded looked more consistent with the Merck Index 15th Ed. minus a few stereo bonds. When looking at the ChemSpider link for the compound, the IUPAC name is different. Unfortunately if Chemspider/Merck Index is correct, this would also change the diagram of the Oligomycins that's on the page. I am unable to access the reference mentioned in the description of the diagram (1995). The references mentioned In the Merck are all prior to 1978. Kinliss (talk) 20:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look. My memory of creating those images about 8 years ago is long gone.  I'll see if I can find a copy of the Nakata reference that I noted as the basis for creating them.  In the mean time, can you specify which part of the molecules you think might contain an error?  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I obtained a copy of the Nakata paper. The chemical structure images that I created match what is shown in the paper.  It is possible that the chemical structures of these compounds were originally mischaracterized.  The Nakata paper is over 20 years old now and maybe the structures have since been revised.  I'll continue to look and see what I can learn.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * From the Merck Index, the stereo bonds are all flipped from the wiki image. I've seen issues in the past with Merck entries. Then the IUPAC name from Chemspider is opposite from the wiki for R's and S's. (1R,4E,5'S,6S,6'S,7R,8S,10R,11R,12S,14R,15S,16R,18E,20E,22R,25S,27R,28S,29R) (current). (1S,4E,5'R,6R,6'R,7R,8S,10S,11S,12R,14S,15S,16S,18E,20Z,22R,27S,28R,29S) (chem spider). After previewing, it appears that chem spider is missing the bond orientation at the 25. The structure identification from the Merck Index is refers to "C. Merienne, T. Staron, Chem. Commun. 1978, 318". Does the Nakata paper reference another paper for it's structure? Kinliss (talk) 23:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Chemical Abstracts gives the structure as "Spiro[2,​26-​dioxabicyclo[23.3.1]​nonacosa-​4,​18,​20-​triene-​27,​2'-​[2H]​pyran]​-​3,​9,​13-​trione, 22-​ethyl-​3',​4',​5',​6'-​tetrahydro-​7,​11,​14,​15-​tetrahydroxy-​6'-​[(2R)​-​2-​hydroxypropyl]​-​5',​6,​8,​10,​12,​14,​16,​28,​29-​nonamethyl-​, (1R,​2'R,​4E,​5'S,​6S,​6'S,​7R,​8S,​10R,​11R,​12S,​14R,​15S,​16R,​18E,​20E,​22R,​25S,​28S,​29R)​-". This seems to match the current images and the Nakata paper, but not Merck Index and ChemSpider.  I am inclined to give the greatest weight to Chemical Abstracts because it is generally authoritative and is routinely updated with structural revisions. The Nakata paper gives the following references for description of the chemical structure:
 * Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 34, 448 (1969)
 * Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 44, 619 (1971)
 * FEBS Lett., 20, 267 (1972)
 * J. Org. Chem., 51, 4264 (1986)
 * -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

This is a more recent paper regarding the structure of Oligomycin A that confirms your structure and it's stereochemical bonds.
 * Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 21 (2013) 2918–2924

The 1971 paper you referenced I was able to find online, but it only talked about Oligomycin B and it's crystal structure. Either way, I'll notify the authors of the Merck Index to review and correct it's entry. Thanks! Kinliss (talk) 17:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like the question is resolved then. I'm going to copy this conversation to the article's talk page so that other editors can refer to it if necessary.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I recieved a message from an editor of Merck and affirmed that their version is wrong and they would notify Chemspider of the error as well. They referenced this paper: Evans et al., JOC 1990, 55, 6260. Kinliss (talk) 15:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It's good to know that they are responsive like that. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

SURENDERA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS SRI GANGANAGAR
May want to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 08:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I deleted the talk page and revoked access. Thanks for letting me know.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

ce tags
I realized that you reverted my edit about new ce tags (like H2O). This was a feature requested long time ago, and now after it has finally landed in production it's seems to be not needed. I'd like to figure out why that happens. --Physikerwelt (talk) 20:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are asking. Can you specify exactly which edit I reverted that you are referring to?  -- Ed (Edgar181) 02:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

GcMAF
Reversing my editing on GcMAF. Please check the references on this website https://gcmaf.se/patient-resources/ms-parkinsons-alzheimers/ GcMAF treats neurodegenerative conditions like Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Acute brain traumas, Psychiatric disorders, Brain aging. Now please explain to me how that could be a vandalism. Henrich77 (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You added the text, "If you post those on this wikipedia page, within minutes it has been taken down. Big Pharma pays disinformation specialists to watch this page and ensure it conceals the truth. They actually reply to your emails – they admit what they are doing. This happens to a number of wikipedia pages – don’t trust it" to a Wikipedia article. If you cannot understand why that is vandalism, then I don't think you are competent enough to edit Wikipedia. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Schulze method
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Schulze method. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)