User talk:Edgarhana

Speedy deletion nomination of Biology new article published
A tag has been placed on Biology new article published requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 07:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Biology new article published


The article Biology new article published has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, rambling essay. Is this a summary of a book?  Tough to tell.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 07:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease or Acid Reflux


The article Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease or Acid Reflux has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * totally unreferenced, waffly essay

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 08:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

We already have gastroesophageal reflux disease. Why do we need another article? &mdash; RHaworth 09:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Think
&mdash; RHaworth 09:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This page is for messages. Do not clutter it with article material.
 * You have already been told above about Biology new article published. Do you really think that Biology new artic published is a sensible title for an article?