User talk:Edgekirov

September 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dan Norris, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. jp×g 06:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Dan Norris; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Opalzukor (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Edgekirov. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Dan Norris, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jumpytoo Talk 07:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss content dispute: Dan Norris
Hi Edgekirov. Please discuss your concerns with my additions, which you have reverted many times, on Talk:Dan Norris where I explain my additions, per the Dispute resolution process. This process requires a discussion between the parties in dispute. If there is no discussion, I will be forced to escalate the matter, probably to the "Request an outside opinion (Third opinion)" stage of Dispute Resolution Requests (article content). In the absence of any explanation of your reverts to my well sourced additions of which another editor has written "Content seems well cited and balanced", I will be reinserting my additions now. Thanks in advance, Rwendland (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Rwendland (talk) 03:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)