User talk:Edgeweb

Panama page moves
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --MCB 01:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I contacted the blocking admin. -- lucasbfr talk 21:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I figured a problem out and reverted it back to the normal name. Edgeweb 04:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Page moving, again
Hello. I have to ask. What exactly determined you to move Panama City, Panama to Panama c ity, Panama? --Rebel2 06:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Numbers
As the trillion article you linked to at the US article points out, the term is somewhat vague, as non-Americans often use the term quite differently. See long and short scales. Thanks, MrZaius  talk  17:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Please STOP moving pages without discussion
Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles or before discussions about the title have ended, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Legend of the image you added to Copa Airlines
Hello, I've noticed that you have added another image to the Copa Airlines webpage. However, the legend is not very clear. It says "View towards a Copa Airlines wing". That explanation is not very clear, you should consider changing it. Also, the image looks blurry and, since it only shows a wing and what looks like a Delta Airlines aircraft, it seems that the image does not portray accurately something related to Copa Airlines. You should consider removing it and adding an more clear image.--Schonbrunn 11:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

New destinations
Edgeweb, here is the official Copa Airlines press release regarding new destinations and frequencies for the remainder of 2007

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070531/nyth051.html?.v=96

As you can see, David is not included. This has not been confirmed by the airline, so you should not include it in the article.--Schonbrunn 19:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Please consider changing image
The image you have added of a Copa Airlines aircraft in an airport with snow does not show if it is a 737-700 or an 800. You should consider removing it and changing it for something that can be more recognisable.--Schonbrunn 18:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Final warning regarding disruptive page moves
You have been warned three times previously about moving pages without discussion and consensus, however, you continue to make page moves based on your personal opinion about what articles ought to be titled. This is your last warning. The next time you disruptively move a page, as you did to De Havilland Canada Dash 8, you will be blocked from editing. --MCB 23:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

What I mean by low quality...
...is that, comparing those two other images with the two that you uploaded of the aircraft in the jetway and the 737 departing for GIG, the two images of the bottom do not show the whole plane and they look unprofessional and not worthy for an article like this. I think that they should be removed and replaced for images that fully show the aircraft instead of "cutting" it.--Schonbrunn 16:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Test Edits
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- LaNicoya  •Talk•  00:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Copa Holdings
Copa Holdings was not founded in 1944. It was founded as a result of the alliance between Continental and Copa in 1998. Cargo and courier are not divisions of the parent company, since they are departments within Copa Airlines.--Schonbrunn 17:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Final warning regarding disruptive editing
You were given a final warning after three previous warnings about disruptive page moves. You were blocked for other reasons for several weeks, and immediately after your return you started moving pages again, with no evidence of discussion or consensus on any of their talk pages, and apparently without having read or understood Naming conventions (settlements). In addition, you have made a number of unexplained edits such as this one which is either vandalism or an inappropriate attempt at humor, and a number of others such as this which is simply inexplicable and disruptive to the article.

If you do not immediately stop moving pages without discussion and consensus and other disruptive editing, you will be blocked again from editing. --MCB 06:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

File:P1110051.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:P1110051.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

File:P1110051.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P1110051.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)