User talk:Edggjhh

January 2016
Hello, I'm Laser brain. Your recent edit to the page Superman in film appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laser brain  (talk)  21:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Superman in film, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laser brain  (talk)  22:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry. My mistake. Edggjhh (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of The Simpsons home video releases with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 23:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

I removed innacurate information. That is not disruptive editing. Edggjhh (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries, please
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 23:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

List of Doctor Who home video releases
Re your edits to List of Doctor Who home video releases - I suggest that you look at the link http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/releases/Doctor-Volume-Release/5566 that you provided. Under "Features:", twelfth bullet, it says "Marco Polo (dur. 31' 24") - a condensed version of the fourth Doctor Who story". -- Red rose64 (talk) 07:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * That site's list does not include features. See http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/shows/Doctor/4939. Edggjhh (talk) 18:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes it does. If you visit the link that I gave above - which I copied unchanged from your edit summary - you will see the following headings: "Release Information:", "Audio/Video Information:", "Buying Information:", "Description:", "Features:". Under the last of these, there are fourteen features listed, and Marco Polo is the twelfth. -- Red rose64 (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * You didn't read this list: http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/shows/Doctor/4939, did you? Edggjhh (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * What does that have to do with it? It's not a direct source for "The Beginning" box set. -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * I have justified my edits. You may not agree with them, but that is not reason enough to call them "disruptive". Edggjhh (talk) 04:23, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * You have not justified them. Continuing to make edits without discussion is disruptive. You need to make your case at the article's talk page. -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Finding Dory, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  15:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ... richi (hello) 21:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello again. It's a shame that the standard uw template message sequence brings us to this point, but I see other editors have issues several prior warnings in the last few months. My reverts were mainly about WP:MOSNUM&mdash;e.g., changing "23rd" to "twenty-third". Practically every style guide, including WP:MOS says not to spell out numbers greater than 9 or 10. Hope that helps. ... richi (hello) 08:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

August 2017
Two words: FUCK YOU.
 * Talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)