User talk:Edgovan20

Red hair
Do you have any intention of contributing productively to Red hair? --Yamla 15:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia maintains a policy of no personal attacks. These remarks are in violation of that policy, and is uncivil. Please refrain from this behaviour in the future. I am not however, asking you to remove the comment from my talk page. I'm quite happy to let that sit as an indication of your annoyance with me. But you must not do it to anyone else. --Yamla 16:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * This edit because of the comment on your user page. Edgovan, you have a history of slightly masking your personal attacks in the mistaken belief that this means you can not be held responsible.  This is unacceptable.  --Yamla 16:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to play these games with you. You have stated on your user page that when you say "111", you mean it as a personal attack, and you have left this as a comment on my talk page.  You aren't fooling anyone.  --Yamla 16:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * In that case, it was meaningless vandalism and also can result in a block. But we both know you intended it as a personal attack.  Do not do it again.  --Yamla 16:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

how do you KNOW it? I could equally argue that you and i know i wasnt intending it as a personal attack.

Edgovan20: Please stop. You are being intentionally disruptive and uncivil. \ Fnarf999 \ talk \ contribs \ 18:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * No, Edgovan20, you will do more than think about it. You will do it. Wikipedia is not a toy for you to play with. You are being intentionally disruptive. Stop it immediately.\ Fnarf999 \ talk \ contribs \ 18:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for 5 minutes for removing Fnarf's comments on my discussion page. Given that Fnarf was expressing his belief that you should be blocked permanently given that you have been caught using sockpuppets and making personal attacks, your removal of his comment is inappropriate. This is a largely symbolic block. I am using it to indicate that your behaviour is inappropriate and will not be tolerated. Any further such action will, rest assured, result in significantly longer blocks. You've had your fun but it ends now. --Yamla 18:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Oh hello again yamla. No actually im still having fun. Right now I am laughing, at you! and its great. if only you could see me, im having a whale of a time. hahahaha!:)

You know i really disprove of your actions Yamla

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalising Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Yamla 23:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been caught using sockpuppets to get around your block. As a result, you have been reblocked for 48 hours. --Yamla 15:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Your unblock request has been denied. You gave no explanation why you think you should be unblocked, nor any indication that you plan on ceasing your disruptive activity or your use of sockpuppets.  In any case, your block expires in an hour or two.  --Yamla 13:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

hello yamla
Hello Yamla. I have a message for you:

dk$!y7q"s$q878uu-'*x88g& o.F<&a$&C8(u3(r+,5&1$$.0&ry>*7a8E&<q&$&7&<j!t878hU_1+

Yes im afraid its encrypted. However, this might be of use if you or anyone else wants to know what it says:

http://it.geocities.com/teutoburgo/java/javi/JaVi.html

I wont give too much away about the Key, other than it is in capitals and it begins with W. It isnt rude or anything, Its a thank you message.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Edgovan20"

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --Yamla 20:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

lol what did i do now? ok whatever I have had my fun now anyway. I hardly think your able to take action though, what are you going to do? Sue me? You havent even said what I did wrong...please explain what i explicitely did that was vandalism

But yamla...im moving out in like a day. New IP...new everything. And dont think il be associating myself with this account. You lose


 * So you have no problem with me blocking this account permanently? --Yamla 20:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC) - er actually il remove that edit, i said i stopped

I have absolutely no problem with it. Why should I care, i can just create a new one. And you can permantenly block this IP Address for all I care. My housemate might however, and whoever moves in after me, but what do I care. Do your worst. I have stated already though that I have had my fun. It did initially start off as me trying to genuinely edit a page, and then people got in my way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edgovan20 (talk • contribs)

Removing current warnings
You know you may not remove current warnings from this page, Edgovan20. Any further instances and I will mark this page as protected. Please note that although this account is permanently blocked (as per your agreement), you have indicated that you plan on creating another account. You must not do so within the next month or that account may be permanently blocked for sockpuppetry and evading a prior block. You may create an alternate account in July, however. --Yamla 14:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

um and how exactly are you going to stop me? im going around to my friends today...i think il create an account there. Or maybe il just sign in on dialup. Tomorrow im moving out anyway. So...how are you going to stop me? with any new IP i get i will not sign into this account, or even mention it or refer to it in any way. YEah...whats your plan to stop me? lol


 * I have no intention, in actuality, of stopping you provided your edits in your new account are quality edits and not the personal attacks and vandalism that have dominated this account. I'm quite happy for you to have a refresh start.  That means that even if I can determine what the new account is called, I won't block it unless it too is used to harm Wikipedia.  I obviously cannot speak for other admins, mind you, but I'm serious about giving you a fresh start.  --Yamla 19:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

But surely if you know i have a new account before July you'll be obliged to block me. You know I havent actually done any REAL vanadalism here. I would never mess up a page or anything. And a lot of the "personal attacks" that I did were just for the enjoyment if getting around the system. Which I did, and yet you still called them vandalism to my annoyance. I'm pretty sure I have made some genuine edits, but I havent been editing wikipedia that long. You will find out what my new user is at some point. --User:Edgovan20


 * This isn't a court of law, administrators have discretion. However, we will not tolerate any further vandalism, personal attacks, etc. from you.  That you were doing it for enjoyment is unimportant.  --Yamla 15:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Making personal attacks ("fucking" and "wanker" for starters) for "the enjoyment if [sic] getting around the system" IS vandalism. It's more objectionable than swearing in the heat of a dispute. By your own admission you are playing around, not making actual contributions to Wikipedia. You are in the wrong on this issue, full stop. \ Fnarf999 \ talk \ contribs \ 15:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Firstly, not vanadalism. Personal attack maybe, but im quite sure we both know I didnt mean them. I dont even know you, so im sure you wouldnt take it to heart. Secondly, I have zero respect for you Fnarf999. I think you are overstepping your authority somewhat - like anyone really feels intimidated by what you say. Anything you have said, are saying, and will ever say will have no effect on anything that i think say or do. It was nice to meet you though. user:edgovan
 * How can I overstep my authority when I have none? You demonstrate with every sentence you type your contempt for the Wikipedia process and the Wikipedia project. Is that what they teach you at Portsmouth? I don't think so. You need to drop the attitude before you will ever be accepted here. \ Fnarf999 \ talk \ contribs \ 06:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Again Fnarf999, all i see is crap signed by your username. Did you ever think that you might be wasting your time? I like the wikipedia project very much as it happens, just not some of the ignorant and arrogant people who use it. You have 24 hours to waste more of your time responding before I move out, get my new place, set up a new account and disassociate myself from this whole account. Oh, and create a new account with a totally new IP :) dont worry though, il ensure I dont leave without giving you a farewell messageuser:edgovan


 * I see you cannot be trusted not to engage in personal attacks even on this page. For that reason, I am blocking you from editing this page.  I hope you decide to contribute productively with your next account here because that has certainly not been the case with this account.  --Yamla 17:49, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Uglydude.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Uglydude.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

File:Gingerfellow.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gingerfellow.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)