User talk:Edi344

Welcome!
Hello, Edi344, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Biographies and categories
Although it's nice to see you have created an account, the edits you are making contradict a number of policies and guidelines and have been reverted. As I noted on your talk pages when you were making these same edits as an IP, categories cannot be added to biography articles unless they are supported by reliably sourced article content. In addition, you cannot add personal information to biographies without including a reliable source for verification. Any of your edits can be restored on a case by case basis if the inclusion of the category is supported by reliable sources. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashraf Sinclair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Warning
Adding categories to an article is not a minor edit. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

This is a final warning. I have reverted hundreds of edits you made as you continue to violate Wikipedia's policies regarding living persons and the categories used in said biographies. You are doing this using the false edit summary "references" and are incorrectly marking the edits as minor as noted by Jmorrison230582 above. If you continue to add such categories to articles without meeting the requirements of WP:BLPCAT/WP:EGRS that have been explained to you, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ling Tan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sofea Jane


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sofea Jane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — BranStark (talk) 10:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sofea Jane


The article Sofea Jane has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued violations of BLP policy through the inclusion of ethnic and descent categories to articles despite multiple clear warnings that such edits would lead to a block of your account. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

During your block, please read these important policies and guidelines if you intend to continue editing biography articles:
 * 1) WP:BLP (inlcuding WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS)
 * 2) WP:RS (and WP:BLPSOURCES)
 * 3) WP:NPOV
 * 4) Help:Edit summary (you continue to add the misleading edit suammry "references" when your edits have nothing whatsover to do with references. Please use an edit summary that adequately describes your edits)
 * 5) Help:Minor edit (your edits are not minor, please stop marking them as such)

It is important that information added to biography articles is supported by the best possible sources (not blogs and wordpress documents) and that the material not be promotional in nature.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ling Tan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Magnum, La Perla and Nina Ricci. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:19, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sofia Jane


The article Sofia Jane has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Harsh (talk)  18:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Carruthers
Hello Edi344,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adam Carruthers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Legacypac (talk) 04:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)