User talk:Edirin247


 * }

Regarding your email
The article for Osayuki Godwin Oshodin was deleted because there was no claim to notability per the notability guidelines for academics. You are welcome to recreate the article if you can show that he meets those guidelines. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Regarding your second email, I do not offer mentorship or editor adoption. It is nothing personal against you.  It is just that I do not have the time to offer any type of formalized help.  I will answer any questions that you might have as best as I can in an informal basis.  If you want a formal mentorship, I recommend that you seek another experienced editor through the Adopt-a-user program.  If you have any additional questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page.  I would prefer that you use my Wikipedia talk page instead of email as I do not read my email very often and only have my email available for communications that may disclose private personal information.  Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Professor Osayuki Godwin Oshodin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Professor Osayuki Godwin Oshodin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Osayuki goodwin oshodin"
A page you created, Osayuki goodwin oshodin, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. waywardhorizons (talk) 21:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Patrick Utomi
May I commend WP:CITE to you, please, for this article. Alternatively simply add bare links but use WP:REFLINKS to fill in the citations after use. Either is fine. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:37, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the email. I find it easier to use talk pages because they make things easier to refer to. We were all new once :). Before you contribute much more, please may I suggest you read WP:CITE and play with the concepts there, probably in your sandbox (see the top of the page here, the very top, for a link. It allows us to make far more of a url elsewhere than just the url. Look at templates such as cite web and also the tools in the editor that you are using to create and edit articles.
 * We need to do more than just add a url to an article. We need to make that addition a useful and full citation in order to make the article apprach excellence. If you need detailed help in the matter User:Timtrent/A good article may be of some small use to you. or add the text to your page here and ask under it for the specific help you would like. SOmeone will drop by and help you quite soon after that.
 * All this will help you to be the best contributor you can be. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I just moved a citation you placed. It was citing the incorrect element in the opening paragraphs, so I have repurposed it. If you have a close lok at the article history you may get more information on the better ways there are of doing these things Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Again regarding email I am glad you now understand the REFLINKS tool. May I suggest you use it periodically rather than at the end of an editing session? And please be very accurate with ensuring that a citation cites with precision the element or elements of the article it is intended to cite. Enjoy editing here. May you bring much clarity to the articles that need sit. I;'m glad I was of some use to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:07, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Resourcery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Networks, Gateway, AST and Switching

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Resourcery


The article Resourcery has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 14:35, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omawumi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wizkid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony Obuh


A tag has been placed on Tony Obuh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 22:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony Obuh


A tag has been placed on Tony Obuh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 00:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Tony Obuh
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tony Obuh, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.stelladimokokorkus.com/2014/09/delta-state-2015-governorship-aspirant.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Tony Obuh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Obuh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tony Obuh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Segun Awosanya
Hello Edirin247,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Segun Awosanya for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Segun Awosanya
Hello Edirin247,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Segun Awosanya for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Segun Awosanya


The article Segun Awosanya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 03:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Segun Awosanya


A tag has been placed on Segun Awosanya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 03:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Segun awosanya


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Segun awosanya. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Segun Awosanya. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Segun Awosanya. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. red dogsix (talk) 03:11, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Segun Awosanya. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 03:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Segun Awosanya, you may be blocked from editing. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 03:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Segun Awosanya. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Segun Awosanya
Hello Edirin247,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Segun Awosanya for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:43, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Segun Awosanya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Segun Awosanya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Segun Awosanya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)