User talk:Edison Bauer

July 2023
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! ... disco spinster   talk  19:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Rudy Gay appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 06:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello! I'm JaggedHamster. Your recent edit(s) to the page Scotland appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JaggedHamster (talk) 05:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Scotland. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. JaggedHamster (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

July 2024
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dejounte Murray, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 13:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dejounte Murray. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicolas Batum.  General Ization Talk  04:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @General Ization Do the research Edison Bauer (talk) 04:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Read the policy.  General Ization Talk  04:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * We like original mistakes here. This is strike 2. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)