User talk:Edistomosin

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gobi Desert, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gobi Desert was changed by Edistomosin (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-29T01:59:18+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Schfifty Three  02:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Urine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 23:33, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Our Modern Sonnet
A tag has been placed on Our Modern Sonnet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  role player 00:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Our Modern Sonnet has been reverted, as it introduced unsourced or poorly sourced negative or controversial biographical material. Please do not continue to add such information. Thank you. Jayson (talk) 00:55, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Re speedy deletion of Our Modern Sonnet
It is not enough that the band merely exists - you have to prove that it is notable. See Notability for more information. --  role player 01:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for vandalism
You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. --Alvestrand (talk) 12:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)