User talk:Edit101123456

Welcome!
Hello, Edit101123456, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Paleo Neonate  – 22:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Traditional Chinese medicine, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Traditional Chinese medicine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

It was not a mistake, someone is trying to influence others opinions of alternative medicines and editing hate into the pages. There is plenty of scientific evidence related to naturopathy and TCM. Edit101123456 (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

TCM is not pseudo it has helped many people throughout history. Now you have locked me. This is fascism and you are now controlling publicly owned content. Edit101123456 (talk) 17:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Nobody has "locked you". There are no blocks or restrictions on your account. The page in question has been protected because you and others were edit-warring. Please go to the article talk page and discuss the content you wish to add in order to establish a consensus for it to be included in the article. Also please assume good faith and don't accuse other editors of being "fascists". - The Bushranger One ping only 18:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and pseudoscience
Wikipedia has the important WP:PSCI policy, as well as the guideline on reliable sources to make biomedical claims, WP:MEDRS. I will also issue relevant standard WP:DS notices below (this is for all editors who edit in the area). Thanks, — Paleo Neonate  – 22:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)