User talk:Edit77edit

Welcome!

Hello, Edit77edit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chris Moore (blogger), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Moore (blogger)


A tag has been placed on Chris Moore (blogger) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Appealing against the deletion of Chris Moore (blogger)
Before you do anything, please read the information at Deletion review, which explains the purpose and scope of the review.

Specific instructions for listing a deletion at the review are in the section headed "Steps to list a new deletion review" at Deletion review.

I have moved our discussion (plus a copy of this thread) to User talk:Phantomsteve/Discussion about Chris Moore (blogger) - I am archiving the discussion from my talk page, since I have created a copy of our discussion.

Let me summarise the reasons why I believed that the article did not "indicate the importance or significance of the subject":
 * 1) "Chris Moore is a blogger who writes, edits and publishes the web sites ..."
 * 2) * Many people are bloggers who write, edit and publishes their own websites. There was nothing to indicate that Moore is important or significant in this regard
 * 3) "He did not originate, but coined, and helped define, the term "Judeofascism"
 * 4) * Leaving aside that "coining a phrase" is generally regarded as meaning the same thing as "originating a phrase" - there is no indication that this shows his importance or significance. Many people originate/coin phrases, which may even be used on a lot of websites, but this in and of itself does not show that they are significant or important
 * 5) * Incidentally, in our discussions, we focussed mainly on this concept. As mentioned there, unless there is evidence at reliable and independent sources which verify (a) that he is connected strongly with the phrase, whether as originator or significant definer of the phrase; and (b) that the phrase is in common use at reliable independent sources - then it is hard to verify this. There was no indication in the article that it is in widespread use.
 * 6) "In addition to LibertarianToday.com and Judeofascism.com, his writing has appeared on the popular Internet publications ..."
 * 7) * Many people write for those publications - although some may be notable as Wikipedia defines notability, it will be for their "day jobs" rather than for. Writing for them would not make him notable in and of itself

The other problem is that you say that reliable independent sources could not be found - in fact all the hits on Google web search that I found about Moore and Judeofascism were all written by Chris Moore, with nothing linking the name and the phrase together in Google News, Google News Archives, Google Scholar or Google Books - which would indicate that from Wikipedia's criteria, the subject is not suitable for inclusion.

Now, it may be that the consensus of editors at Deletion review is that I was wrong to delete the article - that is one of the strengths of Wikipedia - but arguments need to be based on policies and guidelines (see List of policies and guidelines for a list of relevant ones). Asking off-wiki for people to come and comment is frowned upon (and the closing admin can choose to ignore comments from editors who have never edited Wikipedia before, as the implication is that they were asked to come to save the article) - see Canvassing.

When you start the review, mention that I have temporarily undeleted the article for review purposes, and it can be found at User:Phantomsteve/Chris Moore (blogger).

If you do not start a deletion review within about 48 hours, I will re-delete it - if you start the review after that time, let me know and I can restore it.

Regards,  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 09:40, 11 June 2011 (UTC)