User talk:EditDude

File:StarWarsEpisodeIXNumeral.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StarWarsEpisodeIXNumeral.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:F5F7:1064:7E4C:4D20 (talk) 19:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

File:StarWarsEpisodeIXNumeral.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StarWarsEpisodeIXNumeral.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thanks for the cookie, HC7! - EditDude (talk) 18:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

American politics discretionary sanctions notice
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

why should I stop improving the articles?
the articles should be inclusive. The Republican primary one, for example, is all about the minor candidates and how they do. Getting on the ballot the party mucky-mucks don't want you to is quite an achievement, don't you think? At least five of them are going to get tens of thousands of votes and the major candidates are going to get only slightly more. This has been the case with every single second term incumbent since 1936. Not counting the third term incumbents in 1952 ane '68, only two, Ford and Carter, even lost a primary. So let's not kid ourselves and deliberately make a false impression. Arglebargle79 (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I should've been more clear. I've got no problem with you making improvements to any article, but I do have a problem with you adding Ardini to the minor candidates section without consensus. By all means, continue contributing to Wikipedia and make improvements, but sometimes it's best to drop the stick and let it go when things aren't going your way. - EditDude (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

The Republican primary is about to end.
You ask where I get my figures? The same place everyone else does. FIVETHIRTYEIGHT and RealClearPolitics. There are also local papers/sites showing Trump's popularity rating. While one might object to saying something dead certain to happen six months from now, now. It's another thing entirely to say that something certain to happen will happen 73 hours before the event. Most decent polls have a margin of error of around 3%. Some of the lesser ones have 6%. For close races, the latter are useless if it's a close race. However, when it comes to 30 or 40% in a stable situation, it's dead certain. There's a 70% chance Biden's going to win the SC primary today. It would be wrong to say that he WILL win it because there's a decent chance he won't. However, with all the polling done on the Republicans side showing Trump getting from 85 to 95% of the vote, there's no chance he's gonna lose and the rules say that under those rules he gets everything. Everyone actually agrees with that.

So what I'm trying to do, and for some reason, nobody can actually imagine it, is get everything ready for super tuesday. Trump will get all the delegates and millions of popular votes. Weld might actually get two or three from Massachusetts and a total of a quarter-million (as to Weld, we can't say, but for Trump, we can). With 47% of the delegates available banked, it's a mathematical impossibility that he's gonna lose the nomination unless a genuine miracle on the level of Moses parting the Red sea takes place.

Look at the 2016 primary pages. Both of them. That's what the 2020 page should look like. I know there's a consensus not to talk about it, but with 75 hours to go, I think it's necessary. With all the minor guys finished by the 10th, the only thing left to do will be to plug numbers in the results page. Will Rocky, as the not-Trump, get more than ten percent of the vote in Illinois? Will Weld break 20% in Florida? We can't say as yet. But We can say that Trump's gonna win everything with dead-shot certainsy.

So if you think my stuff isn't encyclopedic enough, improve it. Don't delete it. Arglebargle79 (talk) 20:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * I agree with you that Trump will win every contest on Super Tuesday and will ultimately win the nomination. But it's not our job here to be pundits for this election cycle. Predicting primary results - and until they happen, that's all they are, predictions - is inherently unencylopedic, and should be left to the realm of punditry. We can discuss if pundits think Trump will win every state, or will clinch every delegate, but to make those predictions ourselves is against Wikipedia's neutral nature. Perhaps I'll fix your paragraphs up with this in mind later, or maybe not. Deleting them was admittedly harsh, but they definitely need cleaning up. - EditDude (talk) 20:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Liberal Party of Newfoundland and Labrador leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerry Byrne ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2020_Liberal_Party_of_Newfoundland_and_Labrador_leadership_election check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2020_Liberal_Party_of_Newfoundland_and_Labrador_leadership_election?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States presidential election in Iowa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angela Walker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Next Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brazil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)