User talk:EditQwerty

A barnstar for you!
Thanks, you too :) EditQwerty (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

My EliveLinux article
Hello all, My article is moved, according your comment due to: "it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources" but I am at a loss what you mean by that. The majority of references I've added are acknowledged sources for coverage on Linux in general. I don't see other Linux Distribution articles with any different reference sources and wouldn't know what other kind to add.

I'm not surprised by comments on lay-out and/or style and won't mind correcting them but this notability issue strikes me as very hard to see to. Quite interested on how you see this....maybe I'm just looking in a wrong direction. Thanks in advance. Triantares (talk) 17:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, The article does not cite properly, you have added a list of references but not cited it. This to information needs to be verified; otherwise, Wikipedia will just be full of spam.

If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing tutorial and Citing sources. EditQwerty (talk) 18:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, that does make sense. Albeit it's not easy to find points in the text with which to reference considering it's shortness. My only goal was to make sure EliveLinux continues it's presence among all the other Linux distributions out there. Thanks very much for taking the trouble to clarify. Triantares (talk) 09:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

The article looks much better now; feel free to ask on my talk page if you need any other help. EditQwerty (talk) 17:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the changes, although I thought at first I'd accidentally deleted stuff. It did cripple some sentences horribly and had me searching for solutions though :) In some parts I wasn't even aware it was promotional or opinionated but merely showcasing differentations. The DVD/USB port was a nice one .... they're definitely required hardware. :D Thanks again for the trouble. Triantares (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Have a good day. EditQwerty (talk) 08:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for all the trouble you're taking on my submission but your (and maybe others) suspicion of multiple accounts or joint collaboration strike me as a bit "over the top". Expecting a submitter to keep an eye on his/her article is one thing but accountability of changes done by others is quite another IMO. Wouldn't that even be contrary to the fundamental ideas with which Wikipedia was created?

I'm aware (and grateful) that your remarks are well meant advice and don't necessarily mean they're your personal opinion but do get the impression that some general policing guidelines on new submissions are unproductive i.e throwing out the child with the bathwater. :D

Personally I'm surprised at how much stamina it requires to even get an article accepted, especially when comparing to other already published articles on similar subjects.

Maybe this is an issue that has already been chewed to the bone elsewhere on Wikipedia and this isn't the place to bring it up. If so I'd be quite interested to read up on what has been discussed on the matter. My apologies for taking up so much of your time.

Triantares (talk) 07:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Some topics don't meet the notability guideline. They must have some press coverage. EditQwerty (talk) 10:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Solhanspor
Solhanspor is a volleyball team. I added resources. No need to delete. Volleyball team is playing at the highest level in Turkey.Maradurio (talk) 09:18, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

The article has been moved to draftspace: the draft won't be deleted, however, the cross redirect will be. EditQwerty (talk) 09:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

There is no such orientation in other sports clubs. The Solhanspor page must be in its old state. Maradurio (talk) 09:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

it was moved because it doesn't have enough citations when you have finished working on it, please hit the submit button. EditQwerty (talk) 09:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Can you please take a look! You cannot delete a club page -- EditQwerty  46.155.92.59 (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Lampard sacking
have a look at this. REDMAN 2019 ( talk ) 11:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

I know, that's an official source from the website. Don't add gossip unless it has been confirmed by the club. EditQwerty (talk) 11:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It has been confirmed by the club as shown above. REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 11:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

It does not say anything about Thomas. EditQwerty (talk) 11:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Then why are you reverting on Lampard's page? REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 11:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm reverting on the Chelsea FC page, please check.EditQwerty (talk) 11:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oops. I just saw your edit confirming Lampard's sacking. Sorry. REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 11:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

We know Tuchel set to take over at Chelsea. But let the club make it official. Kichu🐘 Discuss 11:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Sorry for the late reply! Glad you found it useful, great to see you are doing well :) EditQwerty (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Editing
Hi, not to sound rude, but why did you remove my edit on Tom Holland's page? He literrally posted on his official Instagram page and confirmed his relationship with Zendaya. What more prove do you want? I put an official source and its unfair to remove my edit when he put it himself.

User: FriendsFan8 Talk: September 1st 2021 (Talk)

Hi, Instagram is not an official source. I see that you have been trying to add this for months now, while it is probably true it has not been confirmed by reliable sources. I suggest you read the information on user generated content for more info. Have a good day. EditQwerty (talk) 18:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi EditQwety, please tell me what is a reliable source. Surely Daily Mail and the Mirror are reliable sources or similar.

12:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Daily Mail and Daily Mirror are tabloid sources, which are considered to be questionable. You can see a list on good and bad sources here. EditQwerty (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)