User talk:EditQwerty/Archive 3

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 11:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Thanks for accepting!
Glad we reached an agreement on the Maharaj/Lara issue. I seriously wish other editors were like you. 81.98.82.229 (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm glad we agreed; feel free to ask on my talk page if you need any help. Stay safe, EditQwerty  (talk) 20:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes
Hello. I don't think you should have accepted this edit because the IP is involved in a dispute about the content of the article and his motives are open to question. Furthermore, the citation is a bare URL which is always deprecated. I've reverted the change. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for telling me.

Question
Hi, I was just wondering if you could let me know how the edits I made did not conform to the policies? I'm a bit unclear. I just changed the phrasing because generally Wikipedia is very formal and 'quack cure' is quite colloquial. I'm not arguing by the way. I'm just curious, because I haven't really edited pages much before. Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience. Also sorry if this was not the correct way to seek clarification. 27.252.108.24 (talk) 11:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

The sentence was a rumor; autism can't be cured, I have rephrased it. Stay safe, EditQwerty  (talk) 11:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Totally agree. I didn't think my edit had made it sound as if it could be cured - I believed I was just rephrasing 'quack cure'. Thank you for rephrasing it so that the message is crystal clear. All the best. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.108.24 (talk) 11:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)