User talk:Edit obsession

Seeker of the truth and making sure the facts are the facts. Edit obsession.

August 2023
Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I noticed that you recently removed content from Frank D'Angelo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 13:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. There's a fake editor continuously trying to sabotage the Frank D'Angelo page SxgrI2k1 if you read the edits they are targeted insults rather than biographical information. I've reported this account to Wikipedia CEO. This behavior should not be tolerated. Cheers Edit obsession (talk) 14:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as a "fake editor". The content on the page is cited. You appear to be attempting to whitewash the article to produce one that reflects your point of view rather than that of the sources. This is also behaviour that is not tolerated. MarcGarver (talk) 14:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Cited by credible sources? Please let me understand what the guidelines are for credible edits on the biographical accuracy of a person's Wikipedia page. I thank you for your much appreciated help. Edit obsession (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks to me like you have a conflict of interest regarding Mr. D'Angelo, in which case you should propose edits at Talk: Frank D'Angelo rather than editing the article directly.  –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)