User talk:Edit of edit

November 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 16:27, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022 failed unblock appeals
My disruptive edits were:(all in 2022) changing the Talk:Robert Marley(cricketer) to a redirect to Talk:Bob Marley, adding unsourced material to Storm Barra(2021) and removing the Short description: None from architechture of hong kong in november. Also, I introduced incorrect information into hurricane Irma in June. What I will do differently is make more destructive edits. The constructive contributions I intend to make are adding the dissipated date when a storm dissipates, copypasting the maximum wind gust of a storm which dissipated recently from the season to the storm article and introduce incorrect information into articles. (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You must make another unblock request. I have fixed your comment for proper display. 331dot (talk) 12:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I am NOT confusing "constructive" with "destructive" i mean disruptive Edit of edit (talk) 14:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you want to be disruptive, we will need to leave this account blocked. 331dot (talk) 14:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS appeals
is closed. Promised to vandalize. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

As an outcome of, I have restored talk page access, to allow you to post an unblock request here. However, if you do so then the administrator who reviews that request needs to be aware of the fact that, while that UTRS appeal was expressed in positive terms, in your previous appeal, mentioned above by, you unambiguously stated that you intended to vandalise if you were unblocked. To have any chance of being unblocked you will need to persuade an administrator that you have had a genuine change of heart, not just a change of tactics to get back to vandalism. JBW (talk) 20:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Might be a language barrier, but man that one ticket. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)


 * At first I too thought that it might be a language barrier, but later posts to UTRS convinced me that it wasn't: it was plain and simple trolling. JBW (talk) 20:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

By the way, if it turns out that you are just trolling again, expect to have both talk page access and UTRS access removed, with precious little chance that they will ever be restored. JBW (talk) 20:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I will keep my billy goats at a distance. (I will also have ready my Ban Hammer of Love and Cleansing]] --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

After talk page access added

 * , you blocked this editor. Do you have any opinion as to whether to give them another chance or not? (Unfortunately HJ Mitchell has recently been editing infrequently, so it may be some time before he replies, but I think we should wait at least a while to give him a chance to express an opinion if he wishes to. In the meanwhile, of course, other administrators may like to comment too.) JBW (talk) 10:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Not forums
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edit to Talk:Two Knights Defense, please remember that talk pages are for discussion related to improving the corresponding article, not general discussion about its topic. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 18:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, Talk:Two Knights Defense is not a place for discussing the Two Knights Defense. It is solely for discussing improvements to the article itself. Please stop abusing Wikipedia's article talk pages as general forum pages. --Yamla (talk) 12:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)