User talk:EdithRose1900

May 2014
Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Danny Racchi, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 21:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Racchi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Danny Racchi was changed by EdithRose1900 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96804 on 2014-05-14T21:50:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Nottingham Academy, you may be blocked from editing. Jacona (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at The Nottingham Academy. —S MALL JIM   22:17, 14 May 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 22:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)