User talk:Editor10293813/Archive 3

Let's talk unconstructive edits
Hi there. Last month, I made a number of spelling edits to this Wikipedia page. They related to the consistent spelling of one word within the same article. Prior to my edits, that word was spelt in two different ways which is not only inconsistent but unprofessional. While I admit that it can be spelt one of two ways, depending on whether you prefer American English or otherwise, considering that the subject of this article is not American, it would therefore be appropriate to spell it the way that I have edited. I would strongly argue that makes it constructive rather than not. If you believe that rough enough is good enough, which seems to be the attitude these days, then you shouldn't be editing. 203.196.41.161 (talk) 03:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello and thank you for your message regarding my revert of your recent edit. I have reviewed the edit in question and see that indeed I was confused regarding the reason you had changed the spelling. Please know that my revert was simply a misunderstanding, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I certainly do not believe that "rough enough is good enough," so thank you for correcting my mistake. In the future, it may help to briefly explain why you make an edit like that in the edit summary area to help avoid any misunderstanding. Sorry for the confusion and thanks for your work on Wikipedia! Editor10293813 (talk) 03:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Notability of American school districts
Hi! I saw this edit to a California school district article. It has been the practice that, since a school district is a form of local government like a city, on the English Wikipedia school district articles are presumed notable. See Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes.

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)