User talk:Editor4820

January 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Joseph Ellis, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Display name 99 (talk) 14:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove sourced material without using WP:Edit summaries and without discussing the issue on the talk page. If you do it again, I will report it, and you will likely receive a block. Display name 99 (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

June 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Ellis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

See WP:BRD. Do not continue to revert and remove sourced content without providing a suitable explanation. Display name 99 (talk) 06:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

You are continually removing relevant and verifiable information from the article without a suitable explanation. That is unacceptable and you need to stop. I don't care how many times I have to revert; you will not get away with your disruptive editing to this article as long as I am here. Display name 99 (talk) 06:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)