User talk:Editor6666

February 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page U. Srinivas has been reverted. Your edit here to U. Srinivas was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/mandolinshrinivas/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nani Krish


A tag has been placed on Nani Krish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/hyderabad/Prodigy-by-birth.Creative-by-choice/2016/06/21/article3491862.ece. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 19:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Nani Krish, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:05, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Nani Krish. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Nani Krish. NgYShung huh? 09:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 11:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The-Oppera


The article The-Oppera has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * no significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources failed WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk) 04:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)