User talk:EditorInCheifWiki

Welcome!
Hello, EditorInCheifWiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Larry Wall did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. S0091 (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Swapnil Deshmukh. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Swapnil Deshmukh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swapnil Deshmukh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Swapnil Deshmukh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello, EditorInCheifWiki. There are a couple of serious issues with this article, as you will see in the discussion linked above, that make it doubtful whether Wikipedia should currently have an article on this gentleman.


 * To begin with, most of the content was unsourced. I have removed everything that did NOT have a source, because policies on Wikipedia say strictly that all content must be supported by reliable, secondary sources - and especially content about living people. We can't talk about where somebody is born or who their parents are or where they went to school unless reliable sources talk about these things first. I'd suggest you read our verifiability policy and the guidelines on identifying reliable sources to help you understand what articles of this sort need.


 * Beyond this, content must be neutral. Wikipedia doesn't take a position on its article subjects, but only reflect what reliable sources say. You can read more about this at our policy on neutral point of view. Content like " one of the most acute and impeccable Dynamic Programmer" is not appropriate for Wikipedia, unless we're quoting a respected industry expert and the view is properly attributed. (Even then, it must be presented in balance with all perspectives.)


 * Finally, there are standards for inclusion of biographies based on how much discussion reliable sources have about an individual. We call this the "notability" threshold. You can read what makes a person notable for inclusion in Wikipedia at Notability (people).


 * I realize it is unsettling to have your first article undergo this process, and I am sorry if this is your first experience. Many people don't realize that Wikipedia does have such rules governing content. Unlike many social media sites, we are aspiring here to produce a neutral and well-sourced encyclopedia about subjects of enduring, encyclopedic interest for our readers. Content that might be perfectly appropriate for an individual's blog or at another site is not always going to fit in here.


 * If you have a connection to the individual about whom you've written - which seems possible based on your insight into his work philosophies - you should also read our guidance on conflict of interest.


 * If you need assistance working with any of these policies or guidelines, you may be able to reach out to the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Swapnil Deshmukh. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 05:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Praxidicae (talk) 14:19, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Swapnil Deshmukh


A tag has been placed on Swapnil Deshmukh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CataracticPlanets (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)