User talk:EditorMelanie

April 2024
Hello, I'm That Tired Tarantula. I noticed that you recently removed content from Minouche Shafik without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. That Tired Tarantula  Burrow  21:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello That Tired Tarantula. I removed some content as it was propaganda and not factual and i like to keep Wikipedia factual. Thank you EditorMelanie (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You removed content from the New York Times and Reuters, which are both considered to be reliable. Could you start a discussion on the article's talk page before deciding to remove the content again? It makes it easier for other editors to understand why content was removed and makes it easer to discuss if other editors disagree with any content removals. That Tired Tarantula   Burrow  19:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Spideog (talk) 22:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)