User talk:Editor at Large/Archives/September 2006

Tengwar Annatar
Here: Tengwar Annatar font. ;) --Djordje D. Bozovic 15:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk page archival :)
Thanks! It's such a tedious job, so I'm exceeding grateful you did it for me. Warmest regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 22:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Minor Barnstar
Your welcome and tahnks again for your help! Æon Insanity Now! EA!  19:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:Television
Thanks for your message. I know of at least one campaign that always needs more people, though my current job certainly gives me somewhat less time for Wikipedia than I used to have. - SimonP 23:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Sources on List of photographic composition techniques?
Does List of photographic composition techniques need sources? someone keeps adding a sources tag, but there's hardly any information there; the only info is "Photographic composition techniques are used to set up the elements of a picture." This is just common sense. I think references on this list would be a little redundant. Sorry for using helpme, I don't have much time and I'm probably going to be gone for a week... — E ditor at L arge ( talk ) 15:29, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


 * While it would be a little overzealous to insist that every particular minutiae should have sources, this article as a whole does need them. One of the main reasons in this case is most readers or editors passing by can't even confirm that what is there exists. They can assume that you are an honest, established editor—though don't whether you are indeed knowledgeable in the subject—but if someone else comes along and adds another item to the list, there is no way to determine whether it might be a hoax. Also, I recommend this list be moved/merged into an article on Photographic composition in general, with a more complete description of it and other encyclopedic elements. —Centrx→talk &bull; 15:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Ballet
Would you like to try and raise this article to featured status? I'll help you if you do. (It's already featured on the Croatian wiki). &mdash;  $PЯINGεrαgђ 20:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Welcome! Now, if I could find the pages for getting started… &mdash; $PЯINGεrαgђ  23:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Alright. I finally found some links. In user namespace we have: User:AndyZ/Suggestions and User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a; in project namespace: Featured article advice (no shortcut), WP:FA?, WP:FA, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR. Hope this helps. &mdash; $PЯINGεrαgђ  02:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)