User talk:Editorialalex

Welcome!
Hi Editorialalex! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Jamiebuba (talk) 08:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation (June 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Arnold_and_Mabel_Beckman_Foundation Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SafariScribe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Arnold_and_Mabel_Beckman_Foundation reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
I noticed the chapter Philanthropy and Foundation in the book Arnold O. Beckman : one hundred years of excellence, which is a reliable secondary source, covers a lot of what your Wikipedia Draft discusses. Better to use it rather than (or in addition to) the foundation website, which is a primary source. Also, you do not use Wikipedia citation templates for your references. I fixed a number of them - hopefully that will give you a guide to fix the others. I'm just an interested Wikipedian happy to help out to improve the Draft so it can pass review. Let me know if you have any questions. Nnev66 (talk) 16:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your help, Nnev66! I finished converting the citations to templates and converted a couple of the foundation website citations to cite the Thackray book. Do you think this is sufficient to resubmit, or are more changes needed? Editorialalex (talk) 01:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I think that chapter is a significant reliable secondary source. The NY Times obituary also covers the foundation as well as some of the C&E News articles. I think there's enough there for a re-submit. My concern is there are a lot of references that aren't from reliable secondary sources - it's OK to include these but they may swamp out the signal from the reliable secondary sources.
 * I don't like the Leadership section as it's mostly just a list of officials. People could just go to the foundation website to see these and they will be changing over time. If some foundation leaders did something notable you could include it in paragraph format. Otherwise I'd remove it as it's not really content for an encyclopedia article.
 * Note if you have any questions you can click on the "ask us a question" link in the submission box to get more specific advice from actual reviewers. Again, I think the foundation is definitely notable - I suspect reviewers want the page in better shape before approving. I'd say right now there's a 50/50 chance of approval. Nnev66 (talk) 19:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC)