User talk:Editorjo

Fair use rationale for Image:Uptown_Case_Art.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Uptown_Case_Art.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Uptown: Portrait of a Palace


The article Uptown: Portrait of a Palace has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet the inclusion criteria set out at Notability (films)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeremy (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:Reliable sources do indeed seem to be unavailable. So I have removed the deletion notice and merged the article on the film to the main article on the theatre, per WP:PRESERVE. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)